On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 09:15 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2014, at 9:05 am, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>
> > On 2014-01-17T07:40:34, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >
> >>> Well, unless RHT states that installing crmsh on top of their
> >>> distribution invalidates support for the pacemaker
On 17 Jan 2014, at 9:05 am, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2014-01-17T07:40:34, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> Well, unless RHT states that installing crmsh on top of their
>>> distribution invalidates support for the pacemaker back-end, you could
>>> just ship crmsh as part of your product on th
On 2014-01-17T07:40:34, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > Well, unless RHT states that installing crmsh on top of their
> > distribution invalidates support for the pacemaker back-end, you could
> > just ship crmsh as part of your product on that platform.
> Thats not how RHT operates I'm afraid. If som
On 16 Jan 2014, at 10:59 pm, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2014-01-15T20:25:30, Bob Haxo wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, it configuration has taken me weeks to develop (what now
>> seems to be) a working configuration (including mods to the
>> VirtualDomain agent to avoid spurious restarts of the
On 2014-01-16T09:21:33, Bob Haxo wrote:
> > Curious if you can push these upstream too ;-) (Or already have.)
> I'll report the issue and I'll include my hack. But it is a hack. I
> know that I do not have a general solution.
Thanks!
> Yes, I install crmsh for development and will ship with t
Hi Lars,
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:59 +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2014-01-15T20:25:30, Bob Haxo wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, it configuration has taken me weeks to develop (what now
> > seems to be) a working configuration (including mods to the
> > VirtualDomain agent to avoid spurious
On 2014-01-15T20:25:30, Bob Haxo wrote:
> Unfortunately, it configuration has taken me weeks to develop (what now
> seems to be) a working configuration (including mods to the
> VirtualDomain agent to avoid spurious restarts of the VM).
Curious if you can push these upstream too ;-) (Or already
On 16 Jan 2014, at 3:25 pm, Bob Haxo wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:32 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On 16 Jan 2014, at 11:49 am, Bob Haxo wrote:
>>
On 01/15/2014 05:02 PM, Bob Haxo wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The command "crm configure show" dumps the cluster configurat
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:32 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2014, at 11:49 am, Bob Haxo wrote:
>
> >> On 01/15/2014 05:02 PM, Bob Haxo wrote:
> >> > Greetings,
> >> >
> >> > The command "crm configure show" dumps the cluster configuration in a
> >> > format
> >> > that is suitable for
On 16 Jan 2014, at 11:49 am, Bob Haxo wrote:
>> On 01/15/2014 05:02 PM, Bob Haxo wrote:
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > The command "crm configure show" dumps the cluster configuration in a
>> > format
>> > that is suitable for use in configuring a cluster.
>> >
>> > The command "pcs config" generat
> On 01/15/2014 05:02 PM, Bob Haxo wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > The command "crm configure show" dumps the cluster configuration in a
> > format
> > that is suitable for use in configuring a cluster.
> >
> > The command "pcs config" generates nice human readable information, but
> > this is
> >
On 01/15/2014 05:02 PM, Bob Haxo wrote:
Greetings,
The command "crm configure show" dumps the cluster configuration in a format
that is suitable for use in configuring a cluster.
The command "pcs config" generates nice human readable information, but this is
not directly suitable for use in co
Greetings,
The command "crm configure show" dumps the cluster configuration in a
format that is suitable for use in configuring a cluster.
The command "pcs config" generates nice human readable information, but
this is not directly suitable for use in configuring a cluster.
Is there a "pcs" com
13 matches
Mail list logo
