Re: [Pacemaker] continue starting chain with failed group resources

2010-12-15 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 06:18:16PM -0700, Patrick H. wrote: > > > Sent: Tue Dec 14 2010 11:37:06 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) > From: Dejan Muhamedagic > To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] continue starting chain with failed group

Re: [Pacemaker] continue starting chain with failed group resources

2010-12-14 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Tue Dec 14 2010 11:37:06 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) From: Dejan Muhamedagic To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] continue starting chain with failed group resources Hi, On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:43:36PM -0700, Patrick H. wrote: After

Re: [Pacemaker] continue starting chain with failed group resources

2010-12-14 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
can point out any > pitfalls I'd appreciate it > > -Patrick > > Sent: Mon Dec 13 2010 21:12:04 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) > From: Patrick H. > To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager > Subject: [Pacemaker] continue starting chain with failed group resour

Re: [Pacemaker] continue starting chain with failed group resources

2010-12-13 Thread Patrick H.
colocation and order. This *appears* to function as intended, but if anyone can point out any pitfalls I'd appreciate it -Patrick Sent: Mon Dec 13 2010 21:12:04 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) From: Patrick H. To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: [Pacemaker] continue starting

[Pacemaker] continue starting chain with failed group resources

2010-12-13 Thread Patrick H.
Is there a way to continue down a chain of starting resources once a previous resource hast tried to start, no matter if the try was successful or not? I've got 3 iSCSI resources which are in a group, and then an md raid-5 array as another resource. I have the raid array resource set to start