On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fmwrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:17:17PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 20:11, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:57:47AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 11:48, Dejan
- Original Message -
From: Borislav Borisov borislav.v.bori...@gmail.com
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 7:52:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] crmsh resource update issue
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:22 PM
: [Pacemaker] crmsh resource update issue
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:17:17PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 20:11, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:57
03.10.2012 08:57, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 01:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
Do you mean get the LSB and/or systemd metadata from the new lrmd?
That should work already.
Is there an utility which implements new lrm API?
Answering to myself.
lrmd_test
It allows to do
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:21:41AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 08:57, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 01:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
Do you mean get the LSB and/or systemd metadata from the new lrmd?
That should work already.
Is there an utility which
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:57:47AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 11:48, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:21:41AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 08:57, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 01:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
Do you mean get
03.10.2012 20:11, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:57:47AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 11:48, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:21:41AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 08:57, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 01:53, Andrew
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
03.10.2012 08:57, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 01:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
Do you mean get the LSB and/or systemd metadata from the new lrmd?
That should work already.
Is there an utility which
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
03.10.2012 08:57, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.10.2012 01:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
Do you mean get the LSB and/or systemd metadata
Hi Dejan,
28.09.2012 14:07, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
...
OK. Silly me. Sorry for the non-vi users ;-) Thanks for the
patch!
Dejan
One more patch to fix lrmadmin disfunction with 1.1.8.
It is a little bit intrusive, but I'm definitely not a python coder :)
You can just take it as a
02.10.2012 15:41, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
...
for req_op in self.required_ops:
if req_op not in n_ops:
-n_ops[req_op] = {}
+if not (self.ra_class == stonith and op in (start,
stop)):
s/ op/ req_op/
+n_ops[req_op]
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:32PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi Dejan,
28.09.2012 14:07, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
...
OK. Silly me. Sorry for the non-vi users ;-) Thanks for the
patch!
Dejan
One more patch to fix lrmadmin disfunction with 1.1.8.
But this fixes
On 03/10/2012, at 6:26 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
02.10.2012 17:40, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
...
One more patch to fix lrmadmin disfunction with 1.1.8.
But this fixes support for RH fence-agents, if I'm not wrong.
Yes btw.
It is a little bit intrusive, but
27.09.2012 20:03, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:02:24PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:22:43AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi Dejan, list,
It looks like shell 1.2.0 (I use
b58a3398bf11621fe7811380f00245dac52d34c6 with
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:53:52PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
27.09.2012 20:03, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:02:24PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:22:43AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi Dejan, list,
It looks
Hi Dejan, list,
It looks like shell 1.2.0 (I use
b58a3398bf11621fe7811380f00245dac52d34c6 with patch you sent recently)
incorrectly replaces the whole cib with just resources section, so all
node state sections are dropped.
Logs and code analysis show that crm calls 'cibadmin -p -R'
Hi Vladimir,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:22:43AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi Dejan, list,
It looks like shell 1.2.0 (I use
b58a3398bf11621fe7811380f00245dac52d34c6 with patch you sent recently)
incorrectly replaces the whole cib with just resources section, so all
node state
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:02:24PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:22:43AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi Dejan, list,
It looks like shell 1.2.0 (I use
b58a3398bf11621fe7811380f00245dac52d34c6 with patch you sent recently)
incorrectly
18 matches
Mail list logo
