On 22/05/2013, at 9:00 PM, John McCabe wrote:
> No joy with ipport sadly
>
>
> value="10"/>
>
> Can you share the changes you made to fence_rhevm for the API change? I've
> got what *should* be the latest packages from the HA channel on both systems.
>
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:34
FYI - I've opened a ticket on the RH bugzilla (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966150) against the
fence_agents component.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:00 PM, John McCabe wrote:
> No joy with ipport sadly
>
> value="443"/>
> name="shell_timeout" value="10"/>
>
> Can you share the
No joy with ipport sadly
Can you share the changes you made to fence_rhevm for the API change? I've
got what *should* be the latest packages from the HA channel on both
systems.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 22/05/2013, at 7:31 PM, John McCabe wrote:
>
> >
On 22/05/2013, at 7:31 PM, John McCabe wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been trying to get fence_rhevm (fence-agents-3.1.5-25.el6_4.2.x86_64)
> working within pacemaker (pacemaker-1.1.8-7.el6.x86_64) but am unable to get
> it to work as intended, using fence_rhevm on the command line works as
> expected,
Hi,
I've been trying to get fence_rhevm (fence-agents-3.1.5-25.el6_4.2.x86_64)
working within pacemaker (pacemaker-1.1.8-7.el6.x86_64) but am unable to
get it to work as intended, using fence_rhevm on the command line works as
expected, as does stonith_admin but from within pacemaker (triggered by
