On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Lars
Ellenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:47:55PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> Can we back up a moment though and restate the problem?
>
> It was also sort of a philosophical question. But anyways ;)
As a philosophical question, I'd have to admit that t
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:47:55PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Can we back up a moment though and restate the problem?
It was also sort of a philosophical question. But anyways ;)
> Is there a specific version barrier you're looking for?
DRBD is one of the few Multi State (or Master Slave or
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Lars
Ellenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:59:56PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> > so, to summarize, I hacked up a compare_version.
>> > and I think I even avoided bashisms! that is once in a life time :)
>>
>> Exemplary ;-)
>
> It may depend on some GN
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 03:16:28PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:59:56PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > so, to summarize, I hacked up a compare_version.
> > > and I think I even avoided bashisms! that is once in a life time :)
> >
> > Exemplary ;-)
>
> It may de
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:59:56PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > so, to summarize, I hacked up a compare_version.
> > and I think I even avoided bashisms! that is once in a life time :)
>
> Exemplary ;-)
It may depend on some GNU stuff in sed and sort, though.
> > comments?
> > overkill?
>
attaching revised generic shell level version compare scriptlet
plus cib/crm detection logic.
hopefully it is more less instransparent what is going on now,
and clear why the eval for the cibadmin -Ql | sed thingy is ok.
the shell version compare may be useful for inclusion into the
"ocf" shell f
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 08:44:20PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:42:32PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:26:31PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Lars
> > > Ellenberg wrote:
> > > > taking this to the pace
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:42:32PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:26:31PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Lars
> > Ellenberg wrote:
> > > taking this to the pacemaker list...
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:53:24PM +0200, Andrew
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:26:31PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Lars
> Ellenberg wrote:
> > taking this to the pacemaker list...
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:53:24PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> since 1.0.4, giving --version to almost any of the crm too
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Lars
Ellenberg wrote:
> taking this to the pacemaker list...
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:53:24PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> since 1.0.4, giving --version to almost any of the crm tools will give
>> you the current version number.
>> it also includes the supp
taking this to the pacemaker list...
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:53:24PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> since 1.0.4, giving --version to almost any of the crm tools will give
> you the current version number.
> it also includes the supported stacks and (if built correctly) the Hg
> changeset us
11 matches
Mail list logo
