[Pacemaker] how to get pacemaker:ping recheck before promoting drbd resources on a node

2011-04-18 Thread Jelle de Jong
Hello everybody, I need to be able to bring down my network interface (network failure test) and few seconds later bring it up again. Without my drbd cluster going nuts and creating split brains. I was advised to use ocf:pacemaker:ping, so I started to integrate this in my configuration: http://p

Re: [Pacemaker] how to get pacemaker:ping recheck before promoting drbd resources on a node

2011-04-19 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Jelle de Jong wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I need to be able to bring down my network interface (network failure > test) and few seconds later bring it up again. Without my drbd cluster > going nuts and creating split brains. > > I was advised to use ocf:pacemaker

Re: [Pacemaker] how to get pacemaker:ping recheck before promoting drbd resources on a node

2011-04-19 Thread Jelle de Jong
On 19-04-11 11:31, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > It the underlying messaging/membership layer goes into spasms - > there's not much ping can do to help you. What version of corosync > have you got? Some versions have been better than others. corosync 1.2.1-4 pacemaker 1.0.9.1+hg15626-1 /etc/debian_ver

Re: [Pacemaker] how to get pacemaker:ping recheck before promoting drbd resources on a node

2011-04-19 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Jelle de Jong wrote: > On 19-04-11 11:31, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> It the underlying messaging/membership layer goes into spasms - >> there's not much ping can do to help you. What version of corosync >> have you got?  Some versions have been better than others. >

Re: [Pacemaker] how to get pacemaker:ping recheck before promoting drbd resources on a node

2011-04-27 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:57:11PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I need to be able to bring down my network interface (network failure > test) and few seconds later bring it up again. Without my drbd cluster > going nuts and creating split brains. > > I was advised to use ocf