On 15 Aug 2014, at 5:49 am, Steve Feehan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:38:00PM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 14 Aug 2014, at 12:33 am, Steve Feehan wrote:
>>
>
>> Is it a problem that several seconds could go by between the node going
>> offline and the notification arriving?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:38:00PM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 14 Aug 2014, at 12:33 am, Steve Feehan wrote:
>
> Is it a problem that several seconds could go by between the node going
> offline and the notification arriving?
> I would usually expect the answer to be yes.
When a node
On 14 Aug 2014, at 12:33 am, Steve Feehan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 04:56:06PM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> What is ganeti doing with the information though?
>> Like GFS2, OCFS2 and the dlm, it might be more appropriate for it to get
>> membership information directly from corosyn
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 04:56:06PM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> What is ganeti doing with the information though?
> Like GFS2, OCFS2 and the dlm, it might be more appropriate for it to get
> membership information directly from corosync.
ganeti wants the ganeti-node-role resource to run on a
On 9 Aug 2014, at 1:58 am, Steve Feehan wrote:
> I have an issue very similar to the one disucssed here:
>
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2014-May/021817.html
>
> Its related to the ganeti vm clustering which provides an ocf script to
> handle vm failover when a node is down.
I have an issue very similar to the one disucssed here:
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2014-May/021817.html
Its related to the ganeti vm clustering which provides an ocf script to
handle vm failover when a node is down. It assumes that a cloned resource
will receive notifications
