Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker and gnbd

2010-05-04 Thread Vadym Chepkov
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > Hmmm... I wonder if the RHEL5.5 kernel is new enough to run the dlm. > I suspect not. > > Why not try the RHEL6 beta? It comes with compatible versions of > everything (including pacemaker). > > http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/6/x8

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker and gnbd

2010-05-04 Thread Cristian Mammoli - Apra Sistemi
On 05/04/2010 09:41 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: Hmmm... I wonder if the RHEL5.5 kernel is new enough to run the dlm. I suspect not. It isn't, no chance to build it on 2.6.18: I lost 1 day trying. And if you run ./configure instead of rpmbuild it aborts saying you need at least 2.6.3x -- Cr

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker and gnbd

2010-05-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > > On May 3, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > >> >> On May 3, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >>> >>> perhaps try the srpm from F-12 >> >> Would be nice, but the last one was in F-9, it seems: >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker and gnbd

2010-05-03 Thread Vadym Chepkov
On May 3, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > > On May 3, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> >> perhaps try the srpm from F-12 > > Would be nice, but the last one was in F-9, it seems: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=182 Oh, I found out it's part

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker and gnbd

2010-05-03 Thread Vadym Chepkov
On May 3, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > perhaps try the srpm from F-12 Would be nice, but the last one was in F-9, it seems: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=182 Vadym ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker and gnbd

2010-05-03 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > > On May 3, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> It is the case, the conflict is slightly different than you think. >> Corosync doesn't conflict with all versions of openais, just the one >> cman wants to use. >> >> You need to rebuil

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker and gnbd

2010-05-03 Thread Vadym Chepkov
On May 3, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > It is the case, the conflict is slightly different than you think. > Corosync doesn't conflict with all versions of openais, just the one > cman wants to use. > > You need to rebuild cman to use the newer version of openais. Hmm, this is what

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker and gnbd

2010-05-03 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > > On May 3, 2010, at 2:23 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> >> I doubt openais conflicts with corosync, unless you have a very old >> version of cman. >> The repos include openais 1.0.x which is built against corosync. >> > > Unless I am doing s

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker and gnbd

2010-05-03 Thread Vadym Chepkov
On May 3, 2010, at 2:23 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > > I doubt openais conflicts with corosync, unless you have a very old > version of cman. > The repos include openais 1.0.x which is built against corosync. > Unless I am doing something terribly wrong, this is not the case. Redhat 5.5 (the

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker and gnbd

2010-05-02 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > Hi, > > I found out I can't use gnbd if I use pacemaker rpm from clusterlabs > repository, because gnbd depends on cman which requires openais which > conflicts with corosync pacemaker depends on . I doubt openais conflicts with corosync, u

[Pacemaker] pacemaker and gnbd

2010-05-01 Thread Vadym Chepkov
Hi, I found out I can't use gnbd if I use pacemaker rpm from clusterlabs repository, because gnbd depends on cman which requires openais which conflicts with corosync pacemaker depends on . Is it just a matter of recompiling cman rpm using corosync libraries instead of openais? Or something els