On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Stephan-Frank Henry
frank.he...@gmx.net wrote:
On: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:52:57 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Stephan-Frank Henry
Hello again,
on quick question.
In many examples I see rsc_colocation variants with keys
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Stephan-Frank Henry
frank.he...@gmx.net wrote:
Hello again,
on quick question.
In many examples I see rsc_colocation variants with keys 'rsc', 'with-rsc'
and 'with-rsc-role'.
Yet when I use them it get smacked by crm_verify:
cib.xml:102: element
On: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:52:57 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Stephan-Frank Henry
Hello again,
on quick question.
In many examples I see rsc_colocation variants with keys 'rsc',
'with-rsc' and 'with-rsc-role'.
Yet when I use them it get smacked by
Hello again,
on quick question.
In many examples I see rsc_colocation variants with keys 'rsc', 'with-rsc' and
'with-rsc-role'.
Yet when I use them it get smacked by crm_verify:
cib.xml:102: element rsc_colocation: validity error : Element rsc_colocation
does not carry attribute to
