On 2013-07-02T10:46:09, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Our problem is that if i give crm resource stop vm1 and immediatly after
crm resource stop vm2
it happens that pacemaker begins to stop vm2 only after vm1 is stopped.
There's nothing in the config to suggest that this would
On 02/07/2013, at 7:32 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-07-02T10:46:09, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Our problem is that if i give crm resource stop vm1 and immediatly after
crm resource stop vm2
it happens that pacemaker begins to stop vm2 only after vm1 is
On 28/06/2013, at 10:48 PM, Sartoratti Lorenzo
lorenzo.sartora...@dei.unipd.it wrote:
Hi
Il 06/28/2013 12:30 PM, Andrew Beekhof ha scritto:
On 28/06/2013, at 5:19 AM, Lorenzo Sartoratti
lorenzo.sartora...@dei.unipd.it wrote:
Hi,
we are using pacemaker since two years and we are quite
Apparently CC'ing the list on my replies was too subtle... can you please sign
up to and reply to the mailing list?
I don't do private support.
On 28/06/2013, at 10:48 PM, Sartoratti Lorenzo
lorenzo.sartora...@dei.unipd.it wrote:
Our problem is that if i give crm resource stop vm1 and
On 28/06/2013, at 5:19 AM, Lorenzo Sartoratti lorenzo.sartora...@dei.unipd.it
wrote:
Hi,
we are using pacemaker since two years and we are quite satisfied: thanks!
We have 30 virtual machines running in the cluster and maintained by
pacemaker.
When we stop the machines with crm, they are
