Re: [Pacemaker] stonith and avoiding split brain in two nodes cluster

2013-03-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-03-25 03:50 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > > The first node to notice that the other is unreachable will fence (kill) > the other, making sure it is the only one operating on the shared data. Right. But with typical two-node clusters ignoring no-quorum, because quorum is being ignored, as so

Re: [Pacemaker] stonith and avoiding split brain in two nodes cluster

2013-03-26 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote: > El 25/03/13 20:50, Jacek Konieczny escribió: > >> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:01:28 +0100 >> "Angel L. Mateo" wrote: quorum { provider: corosync_votequorum expected_votes: 2 two_node: 1 } >>>

Re: [Pacemaker] stonith and avoiding split brain in two nodes cluster

2013-03-26 Thread Angel L. Mateo
El 25/03/13 20:50, Jacek Konieczny escribió: On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:01:28 +0100 "Angel L. Mateo" wrote: quorum { provider: corosync_votequorum expected_votes: 2 two_node: 1 } Corosync will then manage quorum for the two-node cluster and Pacemaker I'm using corosync

Re: [Pacemaker] stonith and avoiding split brain in two nodes cluster

2013-03-25 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:01:28 +0100 "Angel L. Mateo" wrote: > >quorum { > > provider: corosync_votequorum > > expected_votes: 2 > > two_node: 1 > >} > > > >Corosync will then manage quorum for the two-node cluster and > >Pacemaker > > I'm using corosync 1.1 which is the one provided

Re: [Pacemaker] stonith and avoiding split brain in two nodes cluster

2013-03-25 Thread Angel L. Mateo
Jacek Konieczny escribió: >On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:54:22 +0100 >> My problem is how to avoid split brain situation with this >> configuration, without configuring a 3rd node. I have read about >> quorum disks, external/sbd stonith plugin and other references, but >> I'm too confused with a

Re: [Pacemaker] stonith and avoiding split brain in two nodes cluster

2013-03-25 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:54:22 +0100 > My problem is how to avoid split brain situation with this > configuration, without configuring a 3rd node. I have read about > quorum disks, external/sbd stonith plugin and other references, but > I'm too confused with all this. > > For example, [

Re: [Pacemaker] stonith and avoiding split brain in two nodes cluster

2013-03-25 Thread emmanuel segura
I have a production cluster, using two vm on esx cluster, for stonith i'm using sbd, everything work find 2013/3/25 Angel L. Mateo > Hello, > > I am newbie with pacemaker (and, generally, with ha clusters). I > have configured a two nodes cluster. Both nodes are virtual machines > (vmwar

Re: [Pacemaker] stonith and avoiding split brain in two nodes cluster

2013-03-25 Thread emmanuel segura
I have a production cluster, using two vm on esx cluster, for stonith i'm using sbd, everything work fine 2013/3/25 emmanuel segura > I have a production cluster, using two vm on esx cluster, for stonith i'm > using sbd, everything work find > > 2013/3/25 Angel L. Mateo > >> Hello, >> >>

[Pacemaker] stonith and avoiding split brain in two nodes cluster

2013-03-25 Thread Angel L. Mateo
Hello, I am newbie with pacemaker (and, generally, with ha clusters). I have configured a two nodes cluster. Both nodes are virtual machines (vmware esx) and use a shared storage (provided by a SAN, although access to the SAN is from esx infrastructure and VM consider it as scsi disk). I have