Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655379
--- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2010-11-24 02:54:40 EST
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> All done.
>
> Thanks.
>
> http://sta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645
--- Comment #20 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-11-24
02:18:03 EST ---
Please note that you will have to open a new bugreport for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546
--- Comment #59 from Adam Williamson 2010-11-24 00:06:13
EST ---
I certainly never heard anything about most things defaulting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546
--- Comment #60 from Adam Williamson 2010-11-24 00:07:19
EST ---
chen: there's no great reason any more, there's not a lot of d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546
--- Comment #58 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 23:37:44 EST
---
(In reply to comment #56)
> I thought that was already done in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639661
--- Comment #3 from Eric Smith 2010-11-23 22:17:23 EST ---
This toolchain is for "bare-metal" cross-development, not for a Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546
--- Comment #57 from Chen Lei 2010-11-23 22:16:54 EST
---
Why not to use upstream libva instead of a forked version from splitt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191
--- Comment #25 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-11-23
21:56:06 EST ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> It is expected that you'll have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608852
--- Comment #12 from Ratnadeep Debnath 2010-11-23 21:49:15
EST ---
SPEC Url: http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SPECS/epri
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191
--- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 21:48:41 EST
---
It is expected that you'll have to manually install dependencie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164
--- Comment #30 from John Friar 2010-11-23 21:36:44 EST ---
Agreed - it seems to be a bit more work than it's worth... The src
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164
--- Comment #29 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior
2010-11-23 21:06:25 EST ---
Hi, John, I've downloaded the new 2.9 version t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
--- Comment #15 from Nerijus Baliunas
2010-11-23 20:25:42 EST ---
This patch does not help on F14, I still get error as in Comm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546
--- Comment #56 from Adam Williamson 2010-11-23 20:13:05
EST ---
" libva-devel.x86_64: E: useless-provides libva-devel
Package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164
--- Comment #28 from John Friar 2010-11-23 20:11:11 EST ---
Hi Henrique - I've updated my source rpm to fix the desktop file iss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639661
--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 20:01:31 EST
---
Can you comment on how this relates to the existing
armv5tel-unk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613725
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537687
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591331
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191
Ruediger Landmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656421
--- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl 2010-11-23 19:12:54 EST ---
Builds in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=262
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583105
Jean-Francois Saucier changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583105
--- Comment #2 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-11-23
19:09:27 EST ---
Thanks a lot for the review. I will try to talk with upst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566
Jean-Francois Saucier changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645
--- Comment #19 from Bruce Cowan 2010-11-23 19:02:51 EST ---
Sorry for the spam, but I've found (thanks to #osm on OFTC) the sou
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604331
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546
--- Comment #55 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 18:31:14 EST
---
OK, let's take a look. Seems to build OK; rpmlint says:
lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603267
Rafael Aquini changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645
--- Comment #18 from Bruce Cowan 2010-11-23 18:02:45 EST ---
Looking at the huge numbers of jars that osmosis bundles, I suspect
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624294
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628665
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 17:30:53 EST
---
Builds but fails to install; looks like there's a typo:
Error:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628665
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588433
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-23 16:57:09 EST ---
erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626004
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644335
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588433
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639615
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588433
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-23 16:55:28 EST ---
rubygem-echoe-4.3.1-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639615
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-23 16:56:02 EST ---
rubygem-rvm-1.0.19-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654007
Guillermo Gómez changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654443
Chris Aniszczyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646573
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646573
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-23 17:01:50 EST ---
rubygem-whiskey_disk-0.5.4-1.fc14 has been pushed to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646573
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-23 17:00:16 EST ---
rubygem-whiskey_disk-0.5.4-1.fc13 has been pushed to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646573
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588433
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-23 17:00:45 EST ---
rubygem-echoe-4.3.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649777
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608332
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644335
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-23 16:53:16 EST ---
rubygem-mustache-0.11.2-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639615
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-23 16:54:24 EST ---
python-visual-5.32-10.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604331
Miloš Komarčević changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644335
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639615
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-23 16:52:50 EST ---
rubygem-rvm-1.0.19-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644335
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-23 16:51:48 EST ---
rubygem-mustache-0.11.2-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-23 16:49:46 EST ---
python-visual-5.32-10.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-23 16:51:23 EST ---
erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652803
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645
--- Comment #17 from Bruce Cowan 2010-11-23 16:49:02 EST ---
According to http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2010q4/0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614656
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655527
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655527
--- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember 2010-11-23 16:18:08 EST
---
Thanks Steve, I'll take a look at your review request tomorrow.
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654443
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515
--- Comment #32 from Aidan Delaney 2010-11-23
16:10:40 EST ---
Yeah. Just a massive forward pointer to what's down the line.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515
--- Comment #31 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-11-23
16:04:33 EST ---
Aidan: AFAIK, JoGL 2.0 is not compatible with the version 1...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656082
--- Comment #4 from Philip Prindeville
2010-11-23 15:48:40 EST ---
$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/libcprops-0.1.8-0.1.fc13.src.rpm libcprop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645
--- Comment #16 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-11-23
15:51:04 EST ---
Bruce, your package really tries to use some jars from /opt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656483
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Steffan 2010-11-23
15:47:01 EST ---
As a note, this is only needed for branches with Apache 2.2.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: mod_remoteip - Apache Module mod_remoteip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656483
Summary: Review Request: mod_remoteip - Apache Modu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631964
--- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2010-11-23 15:45:51
EST ---
Update to 4.3.0:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/pbs_python/pbs_pyt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655527
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631964
--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2010-11-23 15:38:18
EST ---
Update to 4.3.0:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/pbs_python/pbs_pyt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513320
--- Comment #20 from Stewart Adam 2010-11-23 15:27:49 EST
---
(In reply to comment #19)
> I thought I saw on IRC that someone w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554103
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608852
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608574
--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 15:11:14 EST
---
To be honest, I don't understand why this has a dependency on th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608319
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606421
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606003
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 15:00:06 EST
---
Note that you can remove the %{?fedora} > 12 conditional; F13 is
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631964
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606127
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515
--- Comment #30 from Aidan Delaney 2010-11-23
15:00:52 EST ---
@Sylvestre #29
I'm happy to commit to maintaining it and improvi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554103
--- Comment #17 from Fabrice Bellet 2010-11-23 14:56:51
EST ---
Hi Hans!
Thanks a lot for the review. Here is the updated pack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655527
--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember 2010-11-23 14:44:35 EST
---
CMake upstream strongly suggests to use a separate build directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652665
Bug 652665 depends on bug 639263, which changed state.
Bug 639263 Summary: Review Request: erlang-rebar - Erlang Build Tools
htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652648
Bug 652648 depends on bug 639263, which changed state.
Bug 639263 Summary: Review Request: erlang-rebar - Erlang Build Tools
htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515
--- Comment #29 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-11-23
14:40:31 EST ---
Great. Does this mean it is ready for an upload in Fedora ?
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191
--- Comment #22 from Christof Damian 2010-11-23 14:38:05
EST ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #20)
>
> > I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638909
Bug 638909 depends on bug 639263, which changed state.
Bug 639263 Summary: Review Request: erlang-rebar - Erlang Build Tools
htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652585
Bug 652585 depends on bug 639263, which changed state.
Bug 639263 Summary: Review Request: erlang-rebar - Erlang Build Tools
htt
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo