Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696
--- Comment #83 from Hongli Lai 2011-01-20 03:12:03 EST
---
cpg, we now provide third party packages so I believe it's no longe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651613
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619355
--- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2011-01-20 03:29:17
EST ---
Hi Kevin,
if you have time to comment that would be great.
Steve.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646611
--- Comment #14 from Sven Lankes 2011-01-20 03:32:30 EST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> The original drupal package has a prov
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243
--- Comment #12 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2011-01-20
03:28:39 EST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670164
--- Comment #3 from Stanislav Ochotnicky 2011-01-20
04:00:12 EST ---
* Thu Jan 20 2011 Stanislav Ochotnicky - 6-1
- Update to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: sblim-smis-hba - SBLIM SMIS HBA HDR Providers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671079
Summary: Review Request: sblim-smis-hba - SBLIM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863
--- Comment #10 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-01-20
04:27:38 EST ---
dolphin-connector fails to build on koji:
http://koji.fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669010
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Elwell 2011-01-20 04:23:40
EST ---
Upstream released v1.0 on the 17th. Updated spec and srpm availab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651613
--- Comment #9 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-01-20
04:33:13 EST ---
Thanks for the review.
Yes, I will apply the patch.
--
Co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244
--- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking 2011-01-20
04:30:43 EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Thanks for your wondeful feedback!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863
Pierre-YvesChibon changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613
Mathieu Bridon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191494
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-20
05:07:16 EST ---
perl-Authen-DigestMD5-0.04-10.el6 has been submitted as an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-pr_geohash - GeoHash encode/decode library for
pure Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671095
Summary: Review Request: ru
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671030
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613
--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2011-01-20
05:14:08 EST ---
Hi Mathieu!
The problem probably remains unsolved in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959
Michal Fojtik changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646610
--- Comment #14 from Sven Lankes 2011-01-20 05:32:08 EST ---
The obsoletes is wrong:
Obsoletes: drupal-views >= 6.x.2.11
We do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667171
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646608
--- Comment #6 from Sven Lankes 2011-01-20 05:35:07 EST ---
As with -views - the obsoletes is the wrong way around:
Obsoletes:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612
--- Comment #5 from Sven Lankes 2011-01-20 05:36:51 EST ---
The obsoletes needs to be for <= instead of >=
--
Configure bugmai
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646611
--- Comment #15 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-20 05:49:26 EST
---
As Sven pointed out, since it is only for Rawhide, there is no
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671106
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-MboxParser - Read-only access to
UNIX-mailboxes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671106
Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642858
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System
2011-01-20 07:07:01 EST ---
drupal6-footnotes-2.5-1.fc14 has been submitted as an upd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642858
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642857
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-20
07:10:14 EST ---
drupal6-advanced-help-1.2-2.fc14 has been submitted as an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671079
Ondrej Vasik changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652414
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670365
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670755
Tim Lauridsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651613
--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2011-01-20 07:53:29
EST ---
(I note for the record that haddock-2.9(.1) is out, which is com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863
--- Comment #12 from William Lima 2011-01-20 07:59:22
EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> dolphin-connector fails to build on k
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658942
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670755
Tim Lauridsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670755
--- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen 2011-01-20 08:19:09 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670860
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665005
--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2011-01-20 08:24:36
EST ---
Anyway, thanks for the review.
New Package SCM Request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863
--- Comment #13 from William Lima 2011-01-20 08:34:54
EST ---
updated.
Spec URL: http://poetinha.fedorapeople.org/dolphin-conn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670755
--- Comment #3 from Dan Horák 2011-01-20 08:38:44 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: neso
Sho
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670755
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670755
--- Comment #4 from Dan Horák 2011-01-20 08:47:39 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Thanks for review, Tim.
--
Configure bugma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670860
--- Comment #2 from Dan Horák 2011-01-20 08:44:01 EST ---
Thanks, Fabian, the template and specs at
http://fedora.danny.cz/tryto
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664924
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2011-01-20 08:51:05
EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Warning: the following files are miss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671106
Matej Cepl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671106
--- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl 2011-01-20 09:02:44 EST ---
(explanation: I would like to have this package for EL-5, so an expli
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863
--- Comment #14 from William Lima 2011-01-20 09:02:30
EST ---
fixed build requires.
Spec URL: http://poetinha.fedorapeople.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670834
Tim Lauridsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670997
--- Comment #3 from Michal Ingeli 2011-01-20 09:09:01 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Requires: perl(Test::Pod) >= 1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664963
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671079
--- Comment #1 from Ondrej Vasik 2011-01-20 09:17:52 EST ---
First iteration of review:
please, use %global instead of %define m
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670834
Tim Lauridsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667155
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-01-20
09:27:47 EST ---
Jochen,
This package is geared toward EPEL and currently the only
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671079
Ondrej Vasik changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670755
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-20 09:40:20 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191
--- Comment #33 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-20 09:39:04 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669874
--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-20 09:39:45 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670354
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-20 09:39:59 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667171
--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-20 09:39:30 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670834
--- Comment #4 from Dan Horák 2011-01-20 09:42:28 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Thanks for review, Tim.
--
Configure bugma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670834
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863
Pierre-YvesChibon changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863
--- Comment #16 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-01-20
09:51:11 EST ---
btw http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646610
--- Comment #15 from Paul W. Frields 2011-01-20 09:54:41
EST ---
Wouldn't future versions of this package be "drupal6-views," n
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670860
Tim Lauridsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670860
--- Comment #4 from Tim Lauridsen 2011-01-20 09:56:59 EST ---
These MUSTS needs to be checked for each module:
[?] Package suc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646611
--- Comment #16 from Paul W. Frields 2011-01-20 09:58:22
EST ---
About the Obsoletes, I thought a little more about this:
1. A
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670860
--- Comment #5 from Tim Lauridsen 2011-01-20 10:01:10 EST ---
I am unsure who to handle it.
Do we need a full review for each m
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646610
--- Comment #16 from Sven Lankes 2011-01-20 10:09:49 EST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Wouldn't future versions of this packa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646611
--- Comment #17 from Sven Lankes 2011-01-20 10:16:37 EST ---
Here is an example:
I have
drupal-cck-6.x.2.7-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418671
--- Comment #9 from Chris Lalancette 2011-01-20 10:24:58
EST ---
You are right, of course. Sorry for the noise.
Chris Lalance
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863
--- Comment #17 from William Lima 2011-01-20 10:24:18
EST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> btw http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Pac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670860
--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák 2011-01-20 10:25:35 EST ---
I've opened the question how to deal with the modules on packaging lis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670997
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664924
--- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-01-20 10:34:04
EST ---
Yes, it is harmless. I've already accepted your review.
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863
--- Comment #18 from William Lima 2011-01-20 10:43:33
EST ---
I'll compile with '-fexceptions'.
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619355
--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-20 10:48:58 EST
---
Actually I wrote up most of a review that I just need to paste i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664982
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2011-01-20 10:57:12
EST ---
Update:
Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/per
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664924
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646610
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2011-01-20 10:53:59 EST ---
Corrected obsoletes direction.
SRPM:
http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646611
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla 2011-01-20 10:58:25 EST ---
We need to do them together because of the path change, an orthogona
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671106
--- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-01-20 11:02:48
EST ---
rm -rf it's also not needed with new rpm. I will create diffe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2011-01-20 11:03:43 EST ---
SRPMS:
http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-date/drupal6-date-2.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646608
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2011-01-20 11:07:41 EST ---
SRPM:
http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-service_links/drupal6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671106
Matej Cepl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671106
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671106
--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-20 11:22:09 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670834
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-20 11:21:35 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664812
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2011-01-20 11:25:34
EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> TODO: Add full stop on the end of De
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696
--- Comment #84 from Greg Swift 2011-01-20
11:31:40 EST ---
Hongli,
those of us that need this for clean RoR installations in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863
--- Comment #19 from Frank Ch. Eigler 2011-01-20 11:41:17 EST
---
Under http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines, "Le
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669902
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696
--- Comment #85 from Hongli Lai 2011-01-20 11:53:43 EST
---
Greg, if you look at our reputation we have a very strong follow th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669874
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244
--- Comment #10 from Shakthi Kannan 2011-01-20 12:15:47
EST ---
I haven't got a reply from upstream yet.
- Updated Source0 to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863
--- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-20 12:19:20 EST
---
Only if you try to twist the words into meaning that.
--
Conf
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo