Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730047
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-23
02:58:19 EDT ---
perl-Hash-FieldHash-0.10-2.fc15 has been submitted as an u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730047
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-23
02:58:35 EDT ---
perl-Hash-FieldHash-0.10-2.fc16 has been submitted as an u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730047
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730047
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-23
02:58:27 EDT ---
perl-Hash-FieldHash-0.10-2.fc14 has been submitted as an u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730069
--- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2011-08-23 02:44:01 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730069
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732430
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675557
--- Comment #24 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-08-23 01:38:59 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #23)
> So far I've found two blocking proble
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #18 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-23 01:28:04
EDT ---
Oh, also - I got rid of the additional external source and opted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #17 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-23 01:18:49
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Excellent. Much progress.
Thx - I'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728837
Yuguang Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728826
--- Comment #5 from Yuguang Wang 2011-08-23 00:57:59 EDT ---
Uploaded in fedorapeople, rpm built in fedora 13:
http://yuwang.fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728286
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-23 00:34:25 EDT ---
perl-Module-Extract-VERSION-1.01-3.fc15 has been pushed t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-23 00:34:11 EDT ---
freewrl-1.22.12-0.3.pre2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729813
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-23 00:30:46 EDT ---
perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.10-2.fc14 has been pushed to t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-23 00:33:17 EDT ---
freewrl-1.22.12-0.3.pre2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722914
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728286
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-23 00:26:02 EDT ---
perl-Module-Extract-VERSION-1.01-3.fc14 has been pushed t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729813
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-23 00:25:39 EDT ---
perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.10-2.fc15 has been pushed to t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722914
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-23 00:24:55 EDT ---
volumeicon-0.4.1-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #16 from Matt Domsch 2011-08-22 23:35:27 EDT
---
Excellent. Much progress.
You asked about the proper place for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732597
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732598
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693950
--- Comment #20 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2011-08-22 23:27:58
EDT ---
F16 branch already? Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-minimatch - JavaScript glob matcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732598
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-minimatch - JavaSc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732597
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710917
Orcan Ogetbil changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728837
--- Comment #5 from Yuguang Wang 2011-08-22 23:18:25 EDT ---
Thanks for figuring out this. Package renamed and spec file and sou
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-lru-cache - A cache object that deletes the
least recently used items
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732597
Summary: Review
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732216
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732590
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: c-icap - An icap server implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732591
Summary: Review Request: c-icap - An icap server imple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-uuid - RFC4122v4 UUID generator for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732590
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-uuid - RFC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635359
Bug 635359 depends on bug 634911, which changed state.
Bug 634911 Summary: Review Request: nodejs - Evented I/O for v8 JavaScrip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732216
Bug 732216 depends on bug 634911, which changed state.
Bug 634911 Summary: Review Request: nodejs - Evented I/O for v8 JavaScrip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457343
Bug 457343 depends on bug 634911, which changed state.
Bug 634911 Summary: Review Request: nodejs - Evented I/O for v8 JavaScrip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732585
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732583
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-nopt - Node.js option parsing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732585
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-nopt - Node.js option pa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732583
--- Comment #1 from T.C. Hollingsworth 2011-08-22
21:44:20 EDT ---
Links would probably be helpful. :-/
Spec: http://www.u.a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-abbrev - Abbreviation calculator for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732583
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-abbrev -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732583
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732579
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-semver - The semantic versioner for npm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732579
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-semver - The s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: c-icap - An icap server implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732577
Summary: Review Request: c-icap - An icap server imple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731519
--- Comment #8 from Richard Shaw 2011-08-22 21:16:47 EDT
---
Thanks! It's funny. I just finished trying out a systemd based ver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #15 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 21:08:15
EDT ---
Most recent Koji results:
Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.or
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710917
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731519
--- Comment #7 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2011-08-22 20:50:50
EDT ---
Created attachment 519375
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728826
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2011-08-22 20:26:00 EDT
---
Thanks and where is the srpm?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #14 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 20:46:46
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> c) explicitly patch the initfile fro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552
--- Comment #1 from T.C. Hollingsworth 2011-08-22
20:20:57 EDT ---
$ rpmlint SPECS/nodejs.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles chec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537640
--- Comment #24 from Ismael Olea 2011-08-22 19:39:00 EDT ---
So, are you or Sebastian interested in maintaning both?
--
Config
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537640
--- Comment #23 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz
2011-08-22 19:28:45 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> I assume pdfmod can n
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730815
--- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2011-08-22
19:01:47 EDT ---
Yes, I know this. Nevertheless it's still a helpful tool for PAM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911
--- Comment #36 from T.C. Hollingsworth 2011-08-22
18:02:22 EDT ---
Sorry about that.
At any rate, I've filed a new request at
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911
--- Comment #35 from T.C. Hollingsworth 2011-08-22
18:01:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> He is not missing, just terribl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: nodejs - Evented I/O for V8 JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552
Summary: Review Request: nodejs - Evented I/O for V8 J
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730069
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693608
--- Comment #16 from Michael Friedrich
2011-08-22 17:33:42 EDT ---
you could get the 1.5.0-beta where most of the things for we
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675495
--- Comment #11 from Golo Fuchert 2011-08-22 17:10:06 EDT
---
Update:
- Updated to newest version 20110722
SPEC URL: http://go
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180
Ankur Sinha changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180
--- Comment #26 from Ankur Sinha 2011-08-22 17:01:36
EDT ---
llvm is stable for F16 now:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732205
--- Comment #7 from Denis Arnaud 2011-08-22
16:58:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> - Why are you using a %{mydocs} macro a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730069
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678728
Andreas Bierfert changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732200
--- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-08-22 16:42:58 EDT
---
It was x86_64 I tried.
I mean, that you should preserve timest
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732200
--- Comment #5 from Martin Stransky 2011-08-22 16:35:39
EDT ---
An updated spec/source is available at:
Spec URL: http://anakr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678728
Markus Mayer changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732200
--- Comment #4 from Martin Stransky 2011-08-22 16:17:05
EDT ---
Thanks for the comments, Will try to address them soon.
(In re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911
--- Comment #34 from Matěj Cepl 2011-08-22 16:12:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> (In reply to comment #32)
> > T.C. Holli
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678728
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Bierfert
2011-08-22 16:12:09 EDT ---
Thanks for reviewing!
Here is a spec with the first two issu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678728
Markus Mayer changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722713
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723752
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #13 from Matt Domsch 2011-08-22 15:35:32 EDT
---
c) explicitly patch the initfile from the upstream tarball using P
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732484
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726989
--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Imrich 2011-08-22 15:34:32 EDT ---
Thanks for the comments and for the suggestion with macros in UR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #12 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 15:00:17
EDT ---
I've taken the key generation out of the spec file, what's the p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604971
--- Comment #23 from Germán Racca 2011-08-22 15:02:05 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> [...]
> >
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530910
Ismael Olea changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537640
Ismael Olea changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #11 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 14:47:31
EDT ---
I guess not... the mkdir -p should be sufficient.
How's this lo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #10 from Matt Domsch 2011-08-22 14:40:56 EDT
---
Do you need all the test -d's ? mkdir -p will create (or not) if
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo