Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666409
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 14:50:04 EDT ---
t4k_common-0.1.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737574
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728329
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 14:56:05 EDT ---
perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732150
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 14:59:50 EDT ---
btm-2.1.1-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742189
James Laska changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741706
Thomas Spura changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732150
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736069
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-30
15:08:36 EDT ---
apache-parent-10-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736069
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742389
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735705
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 15:12:06 EDT ---
xs-0.1-2.git9c19777.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735705
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 15:14:25 EDT ---
perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.003-1.fc16 has been pushed to th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742389
--- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-09-30
15:23:10 EDT ---
I'm planning to submit also the Light themes from Ubuntu, w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733179
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 15:26:28 EDT ---
filebench-1.4.9-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731455
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 15:27:20 EDT ---
django-authopenid-1.0.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733179
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731455
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714328
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 15:36:40 EDT ---
xmedcon-0.10.7-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 st
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733053
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 15:36:30 EDT ---
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc16 has been pushed to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714328
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731003
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731003
Bug 731003 depends on bug 731001, which changed state.
Bug 731001 Summary: Review Request: lua-inotify - Inotify bindings for Lu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971
--- Comment #42 from Ilyes Gouta 2011-09-30 17:39:21
EDT ---
Michael, Kevin,
Thanks for the explanations! Understood :)
I'll
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702103
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 15:39:58 EDT ---
gramps-3.3.0-1.fc16, python-osmgpsmap-0.7.3-5.fc16 has be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702103
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731000
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731000
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 15:46:40 EDT ---
lua-alt-getopt-0.7.0-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742388
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2011-09-30 15:47:12 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The __provides_exclude_from shouldn't be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731001
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 15:51:35 EDT ---
lua-inotify-1.0-0.2.20110529git6d0f7a0973cfb.fc16 has bee
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731001
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740160
--- Comment #8 from Veeti Paananen 2011-09-30
15:58:08 EDT ---
> I did this and rpmlint gave an error (E: explicit-lib-dependen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971
--- Comment #35 from Ilyes Gouta 2011-09-30 16:10:14
EDT ---
Hi Michael,
> For the versioned libraries that would be better. N
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971
--- Comment #36 from Kevin Kofler 2011-09-30 16:26:11
EDT ---
No, that's not a good idea. Your stuff will most likely not run a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683591
Bruno Postle changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683591
Bruno Postle changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971
--- Comment #37 from Kevin Kofler 2011-09-30 16:44:11
EDT ---
See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-February/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971
--- Comment #40 from Kevin Kofler 2011-09-30 16:47:52
EDT ---
> You can find documentation about filtering automatic Provides/R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971
--- Comment #38 from Michael Schwendt 2011-09-30 16:44:44
EDT ---
This has nothing to do with rpaths.
Imagine the following sc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971
--- Comment #39 from Kevin Kofler 2011-09-30 16:46:45
EDT ---
You might also need 1 backslash before the parentheses which aren
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971
--- Comment #41 from Kevin Kofler 2011-09-30 16:50:36
EDT ---
Hmmm, nevermind, looks like the macros in use there are new wrapp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740160
--- Comment #9 from Craig Barnes 2011-10-01 01:32:57 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > I did this and rpmlint gave an error (
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713313
--- Comment #10 from Ken Dreyer 2011-10-01 01:32:10 EDT
---
Hi Volker, I'm finishing up a large project at work... I'll get an
101 - 144 of 144 matches
Mail list logo