https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830053
Peng Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Peng Wu ---
N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819955
--- Comment #2 from Gregor Tätzner ---
pre review:
- licence: in addition to GPLv3+:
kcm/configwidgets/selectimagebutton.cpp: LGPL (v2.1 or later)
kcm/configwidgets/selectimagebutton.h: LGPL (v2.1 or later)
- can't access source0, better us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806040
--- Comment #11 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Your SRPM and spec file don't match.
Please bump the release number on every version you publish. This makes life
easier for reviewers.
Also, please use the name and version macro in Source0.
Why did yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819953
--- Comment #10 from Gregor Tätzner ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I appreciate the feedback, but please focus on review-blockers only first.
Just record the fixes in changelog, so I can track your modifications.
> - macros: please use consisten
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830053
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830398
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Juss
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830396
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823054
--- Comment #8 from Remi Collet ---
Small note:
Extension dependencies should be described in the package.xml
You can report this to upstream with the result of your analysis.
ex :
spl
tokenizer
pear m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823056
--- Comment #8 from Remi Collet ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Since these fixes upstream will require a new release (probably 2.0.16), may
> I just fix the package.xml in the spec file?
Yes, it will allow us to proceed to the review
> I will w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823046
--- Comment #10 from Remi Collet ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> If role="data" will take some time to implement, is it
> fine to revert to role="php" for now and plan on role="data" for a future
> enhancement?
Yes.
> Since these fixes upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823054
--- Comment #7 from Shawn Iwinski ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > You, you need to add "php-do" in dependency list
>
> Thanks Remi. I will add the "php-pdo" require after the approved import.
Never mind! This package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827745
--- Comment #4 from Prathamesh Sonpatki ---
rpmlint output
➜ rpmbuild rpmlint SPECS/junicode-fonts.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
➜ rpmbuild rpmlint SRPMS/junicode-fonts-1.01-5.fc17.src.rpm
junicode-fonts.sr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823054
--- Comment #6 from Shawn Iwinski ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> You, you need to add "php-do" in dependency list
Thanks Remi. I will add the "php-pdo" require after the approved import.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829865
--- Comment #2 from Dan Scott ---
Thanks again, Iain! The updated spec and SRPM live at:
Spec URL: http://bzr.coffeecode.net/scratch/perl-MARC-XML/perl-MARC-XML.spec
SRPM URL:
http://bzr.coffeecode.net/scratch/perl-MARC-XML/perl-MARC-XML-0.93-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830221
--- Comment #3 from Dan Scott ---
Thanks again, Iain! I've reposted the updated spec file and srpm to:
Spec URL:
http://bzr.coffeecode.net/scratch/perl-Library-CallNumber-LC/perl-Library-CallNumber-LC.spec
SRPM URL:
http://bzr.coffeecode.net/scr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829860
--- Comment #5 from Dan Scott ---
Iain: thanks so much for your detailed review comments! I do hope that
Evergreen (http://evergreen-ils.org) will be useful to the community of
Evergreen; you can always pass my contact info on for help if that co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823043
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
php-symfony2-Console-2.0.15-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Console-2.0.15-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823043
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
php-symfony2-Console-2.0.15-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Console-2.0.15-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823043
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
php-symfony2-Console-2.0.15-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Console-2.0.15-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823043
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822182
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822182
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-websockify-0.1.0-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-websockify-0.1.0-4.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822182
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-websockify-0.1.0-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-websockify-0.1.0-4.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822182
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823063
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Shawn Iw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824539
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823041
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823066
--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Issue: XSD file installed as doc, but referenced by code.
-- XSD file --
Symfony/Component/Validator/Mapping/Loader/schema/dic/constraint-mapping/constraint-mapping-1.0.xsd
-- Code (from Symfony/Component/V
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823042
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823065
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Issue: XSD files installed as doc, but referenced by code.
-- XSD files --
*
Symfony/Component/Translation/Loader/schema/dic/xliff-core/xliff-core-1.2-strict.xsd
* Symfony/Component/Translation/Loader/schema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817302
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823060
--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> -- Code --
from Routing/Loader/XmlFileLoader.php
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823060
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Issue: XSD file installed as doc, but referenced by code.
-- XSD file --
Symfony/Component/Routing/Loader/schema/routing/routing-1.0.xsd
-- Code --
protected function validate(\DOMDocument $dom)
{
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488
--- Comment #17 from Stephen Gallagher ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I understood that creating a subpackage for libxradius was not correct
> because it was not connected to any "upstream" project, hence the need to
> package libradius which wa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823056
--- Comment #7 from Shawn Iwinski ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This package seems broken.
>
> Until version 2.0.14 all ".res" file were installed as "php"
> Since version 2.0.15 they are installed as "doc"
>
> In code (Symfony/Component/Local
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823046
--- Comment #9 from Shawn Iwinski ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> So for late error detection
>
> DependencyInjection/Loader/schema/dic/services/services-1.0.xsd should be
> installed as role="php", not as role="doc" as this path is referred in t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827167
--- Comment #11 from Gary Gatling ---
Hello. This is attempt #2.
SRPM:
http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/bumblebee/fedora17/SRPMS/bumblebee-3.0.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
Specfile:
http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/bumb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819953
--- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter ---
I appreciate the feedback, but please focus on review-blockers only first.
In particular, I need feedback on (stuff I'm not sure are worth worrying too
much about right now...):
- macros: please use consistent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819953
--- Comment #8 from Gregor Tätzner ---
pre review:
- licence
GPLv2 is not sufficient. Most of the files are GPLv3+ with exception off:
/liblightdm-gobject and /liblightdm-qt: LGPLv3+
/tests: not specified
- macros: please use consistently the n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819953
--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter ---
Yes, let's please focus on review blockers first, then work, fix, collaborate
on development in rawhide to fix bugs and make things work well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827664
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
zukini-20120607-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zukini-20120607-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830571
--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell ---
There's a review request for the optional test dependency perl-B-Generate at
bug 830593.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830593
Bug ID: 830593
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827664
Mattia Meneguzzo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829865
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826520
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||830587
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830587
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||826520
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830587
Bug ID: 830587
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830221
--- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell ---
I must be getting forgetful in my old age. The comment from bug 829860
regarding BuildRoot tag applies here too, of course.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829860
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||830221
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830221
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829860
--- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell ---
Nearly forgot - you should also use DESTDIR instead of PERL_INSTALL_ROOT in
%install section. Bug 562316 has some background.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829860
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826520
--- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen ---
Hi(In reply to comment #1)
> hiera.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) plugin -> plug in, plug-in,
> plugging
plugin is in very common usage I would say but I am happy to change
to plug-in. I will change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830581
Bug ID: 830581
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759712
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830575
Bug ID: 830575
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830571
Bug ID: 830571
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827805
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-ttystatus-0.18-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-ttystatus-0.18-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827805
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-ttystatus-0.18-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-ttystatus-0.18-2.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827805
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739015
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-riak_sysmon-1.1.2-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-riak_sysmon-1.1.2-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739015
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-riak_sysmon-1.1.2-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-riak_sysmon-1.1.2-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739015
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-riak_sysmon-1.1.2-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-riak_sysmon-1.1.2-3.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739015
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819953
Gregor Tätzner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|gre...@freenet.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819955
Gregor Tätzner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|gre...@freenet.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819954
Gregor Tätzner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|gre...@freenet.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830277
--- Comment #4 from pierrejourda...@gmail.com ---
The requires of my rpm package are :
Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <=
4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819953
--- Comment #6 from Gregor Tätzner ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> thanks, I'll consider it, but I'd rather we finish the reviews first, then
> find some solution.
You sure? Imho this should be fixed before shipping the package. It's kinda
broke
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510
--- Comment #24 from nicolas.vievi...@univ-valenciennes.fr ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Nicolas,
> Your continued efforts are much appreciated.
Thanks for your encouragement!
--
NVieville
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819953
--- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter ---
thanks, I'll consider it, but I'd rather we finish the reviews first, then find
some solution.
Personally, I feel alternatives should be a last-resort solution, after all
other avenues of simpler/safer ones h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820115
--- Comment #3 from Ding-Yi Chen ---
Concern in comment1 addressed:
SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/leptonica.spec
SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/leptonica-1.68-3.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819953
--- Comment #4 from Gregor Tätzner ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> b. an open problem, we're trying to find a better solution via scripting or
> alternatives, or http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/lightdm/lightdm.spec
Srpm: http://brummbq.fedorapeop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819954
Gregor Tätzner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gre...@freenet.de
--- Comment #1 from G
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819955
Gregor Tätzner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gre...@freenet.de
--- Comment #1 from G
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827809
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I tried to review your package.
> Nevertheless, as you can see, I decided not to officially assign the review
> to myself, since this is my first attempt and I don't want m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829809
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Thanks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827649
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Af
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827664
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823070
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823062
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823058
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823051
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823050
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823047
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799558
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759712
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739015
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827745
--- Comment #3 from Prathamesh Sonpatki ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Hi Parag
I have done one informal review here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683780.
I will do some more in this week.
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816565
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hdego...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823063
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Remi Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823063
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799558
Christoph Wickert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Chri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510
--- Comment #23 from Didier ---
Nicolas,
Your continued efforts are much appreciated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823046
--- Comment #8 from Remi Collet ---
So for late error detection
DependencyInjection/Loader/schema/dic/services/services-1.0.xsd should be
installed as role="php", not as role="doc" as this path is referred in the code
In DependencyInjection/Loa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823056
--- Comment #6 from Remi Collet ---
Notice : You could have detect this regression when updating your package to
2.0.15
A good practice when you update a package : run "rpmdiff" between the old and
the new version and analyze the changes
For PE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823056
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739015
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Peter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829726
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Bierfert ---
Some minor tweaks:
Please change the release to
0.1.beta2.mmddgit575778a6
and substitute the date you took the snapshot on for mmdd (see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
