https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #4 from Mattia Meneguzzo mattia.meneguzzo+fed...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/eGTK/2012.06.17/egtk.spec
SRPM URL:
http://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/eGTK/2012.06.17/egtk-3.1-2.fc17.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830159
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830777
Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
--- Comment #7 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
changelog
* Sun Jun 17 2012 Martin Gansser linux4mar...@gmx.de - 2.1-4
- fixed missing slash in path
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781766
--- Comment #3 from Aurimas Černius auri...@gmail.com ---
I've uploaded new spec and SRPM:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Stardict-dic-lt.spec
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Stardict-dic-lt-0.7-1.fc17.src.rpm
There's one more package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
--- Comment #8 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
changelog
* Sun Jun 17 2012 Martin Gansser linux4mar...@gmx.de - 2.1-5
- fixed more missing slash in path
- fixed missing system unit file
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827761
--- Comment #5 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi ---
URL is wrong, should probably be http://andreas.vdr-developer.org/enigmang/
License should probably be GPL+, I couldn't find anything in the tarball that'd
say GPLv2+ (I've sent a patch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832803
Bug ID: 832803
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832804
Bug ID: 832804
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832804
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||832803
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832803
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||832804
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832804
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832810
Bug ID: 832810
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832816
Bug ID: 832816
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832816
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832830
Bug ID: 832830
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832831
Bug ID: 832831
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832830
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||832831
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832831
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||832830
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827761
--- Comment #6 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
SRPM URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-skinenigmang/vdr-skinenigmang-0.1.2-5/vdr-skinenigmang-0.1.2-5.fc17.src.rpm?a=FrLMjrmUnt8
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Both updates for F17 and F16 are still pending, so they are not available and
won't be published ever. You need to request a push to testing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #16 from Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com ---
Sorry, I accidentally downloaded the SRPM from the original post. Now, as a
starter, I want to point a few things:
* Changelog format does not fit the requirements:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828993
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825415
--- Comment #16 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Libexecdir:
Packagers are highly encouraged to store libexecdir files in a package-specific
subdirectory of %{_libexecdir}, such
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827761
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828732
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Thank you for the review!
- The comments in feedstail/utils.py state that the Storage class
(the only one in this file) is from the web.py project and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823017
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808884
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823166
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823180
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822730
--- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
Currently I am on holidays with limited internet access, so my response time is
a bit longer :) I will be back in office 2012-06-25.
Other things that I have spotted so far:
* I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808884
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Data-Clone-0.003-2.fc17.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823166
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora
16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823017
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
erlang-gtknode-0.32-2.20110310git19ddfd5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823167
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829528
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823167
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Annotation-0.44-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752169
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822928
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826014
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822928
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
erlang-basho_metrics-1.0.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823180
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Plack-Middleware-ForceEnv-0.02-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830277
--- Comment #8 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com ---
The release tag is not good. The release number is missing but is mandatory: it
defines the number of times the package has been modified using the same
version of the packaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830277
--- Comment #9 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com ---
By the way, only links to spec files and source RPMs are required in a review.
Binary RPMs are useless, it's up to the reviewer to build and check binary
RPMs.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790667
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790667
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
msgpack-0.5.7-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/msgpack-0.5.7-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790667
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
msgpack-0.5.7-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/msgpack-0.5.7-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790667
Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Bug ID: 832853
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
49 matches
Mail list logo