https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738744
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658754
Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciup...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658754
Esen Sagynov esen.sagy...@nhn.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(esen.sagynov@nhn. |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830750
Satya Komaragiri skoma...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833395
Andrew Elwell andrew.elw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828732
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
No response from upstream regarding feedstail/utils.py. or even regarding that
'patch'. I added a comment, what it does.
I'd tend to see utils.py as fork from the corresponding file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833353
--- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Patryk, did you repackage the source zip?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511
--- Comment #4 from Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com ---
Uploaded next version:
http://akozumpl.fedorapeople.org/review/dnf_3/dnf.spec
http://akozumpl.fedorapeople.org/review/dnf_3/dnf-0.2.6-9.gitb4aa5c1.fc17.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #3)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834127
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||827167
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827167
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
--- Comment #1 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827167
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|0x |Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
--- Comment #4 from vasc...@gmail.com ---
Updated to 0.2.0
SRPM URL:
http://koji.russianfedora.ru/packages/grive/0.2.0/1.fc17.R/src/grive-0.2.0-1.fc17.R.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818805
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #17 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 593402
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=593402action=edit
Patch for sed line, apps version
This is to remove the sed lines from the .spec. This only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #18 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 593403
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=593403action=edit
patch for sed line, libs version
This is to remove the sed lines from the .spec file. This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #19 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com ---
I created the patches by running the sed lines on the Makefiles on the
commandline, and modifying it so that it would take OPTFLAGS as an arguemnt. It
doesn't build though, i get the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834239
Bug ID: 834239
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806040
--- Comment #14 from jdekloe kloe0...@planet.nl ---
New spec and srpm files are here:
Spec URL: http://jdekloe.nl/Fedora/pyproj.spec
SRPM URL: http://jdekloe.nl/Fedora/pyproj-1.9.2-4.r298.fc16.src.rpm
The dot has been added as suggested, and I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806040
--- Comment #15 from jdekloe kloe0...@planet.nl ---
A small addition.
During testing I also noticed that Requires: proj-nad works fine for the
python package. It refuses to install the pyproj rpm in case proj-nad is
absent.
However, the python3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
Vasiliy,
the project homepage is gone (http 404)
you should update it to match the new url: https://github.com/Grive/grive
If you're listing both
SPEC:
SRPM:
it's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #20 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com ---
Updated spec:http://jvlomax.fedorapeople.org/packeging/zita-alsa-pcmi.spec
updated SRPM:
http://jvlomax.fedorapeople.org/packeging/zita-alsa-pcmi-0.2.0-5.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
--- Comment #6 from vasc...@gmail.com ---
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install section created by rpmdev-newspec.
Should I manually remove it from all new specs created by rpmdev-newspec?
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #21 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
Try this:
%build
export OPTFLAGS=%{optflags}
make PREFIX=%{_prefix} LIBDIR=%{_libdir} %{?_smp_mflags} -C libs
make PREFIX=%{_prefix} LIBDIR=%{_libdir} %{?_smp_mflags} -C apps
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
rpmdev-newspec is ONE way to create specs.
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf is only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828879
--- Comment #13 from Lukáš Czerner lczer...@redhat.com ---
Hi Eric,
thank you very much for the review! I have updated description according your
comments in Comment 7.
Regarding the commands used in the system storage manager:
cryptsetup-luks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
Missing reference to no rm -rf in install:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/maven-processor-plugin/1/maven-processor-plugin.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834239
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
--- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Thanks, but we still don't know what's the actual license of this project. Once
we hear back from the developer - we can move forward with the review. Until
then, I'm holding this review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #22 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com ---
Here is (hopefully) the final update
spec: http://jvlomax.fedorapeople.org/packeging/zita-alsa-pcmi.spec
srpm:
http://jvlomax.fedorapeople.org/packeging/zita-alsa-pcmi-0.2.0-6.fc17.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
--- Comment #9 from vasc...@gmail.com ---
Can you show full build log? Because my build was succesfull
http://koji.russianfedora.ru/packages/grive/0.2.0/1.fc17.R/data/logs/i686/build.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717
--- Comment #6 from Dennis van Dok denni...@nikhef.nl ---
The lcmaps package has been extensively updated upstream; once more I would
like to request for a review for inclusion in Fedora.
The spec file is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830155
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832504
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
No need to request f18, devel is automatic.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Please include an SCM request.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834098
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834239
--- Comment #1 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com ---
Updated .spec:http://jvlomax.fedorapeople.org/packeging/monobristol.spec
updated SRPM:
http://jvlomax.fedorapeople.org/packeging/monobristol-0.60.3-3.fc17.src.rpm
rpmlint .spec:
0 packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/maven-processor-plugin/2/maven-processor-plugin.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
--- Comment #10 from vasc...@gmail.com ---
It not compile in rawhide. I created bugreport to upstream
https://github.com/Grive/grive/issues/72
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
--- Comment #5 from Chris Lockfort clock...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-pyudev
Short Description: Python bindings for libudev
Owners: clockfort
Branches: f17, el6
InitialCC:
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818805
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818805
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Brendan, please ser fedora-review to +.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833204
--- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
You might create a ticket for the update to python-pyramid and mark this ticket
as blocking on that one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
maven-processor-plugin-2.0.5-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/maven-processor-plugin-2.0.5-2.fc17
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818805
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818805
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808258
--- Comment #10 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Thanks, Michael. :)
Andy, let's wait just a little while for a response from amoffat on
https://github.com/amoffat/pbs/pull/64 ; I'd really like his feedback.
If he's unresponsive, you can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818805
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
--- Comment #3 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
2. I know hogweed is a library and on some other distros library packages
are always prefixed with lib, but as we don't have that convention in
Fedora, would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
--- Comment #4 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
2. I know hogweed is a library and on some other distros library packages
are always prefixed with lib, but as we don't have that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831491
--- Comment #9 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
I forgot to mark the bug number in bodhi, but this has been pushed to testing.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9583/php-zmq-0.6.0-4.20120613git516bd6f.fc17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
Chris Lockfort clock...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pwout...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Summary and SCM package names don't match, please correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
Chris Lockfort clock...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
Chris Lockfort clock...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
--- Comment #7 from Chris Lockfort clock...@redhat.com ---
Fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819953
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
lightdm-kde-0.1.1-6.fc17,lightdm-gtk-1.1.6-3.fc17,lightdm-1.2.2-15.fc17 has
been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819953
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
lightdm-gtk-1.1.6-3.fc16,lightdm-kde-0.1.1-6.fc16,lightdm-1.2.2-15.fc16 has
been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Email address clockf...@csh.rit.edu is not a valid bugzilla email address.
Either make a bugzilla account with that email address or change your email
address in the Fedora Account System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818805
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
--- Comment #9 from Chris Lockfort clock...@redhat.com ---
FAS email changed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
Chris Lockfort clock...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818805
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Duplicate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802549
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
axis2-1.6.1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/axis2-1.6.1-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816124
--- Comment #36 from Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com ---
Sorry for delay. I'm back from holidays. The spec src.rpm is now updated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816124
--- Comment #37 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Spec and SRPM spec don't match, please post new, matching URLs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808258
--- Comment #11 from Andy Grover agro...@redhat.com ---
Hi Ralph.
Even if upstream isn't receptive (it's been 6 days, how long were you thinking
we should wait?), I don't know if we'd need to fork, we could just run the
translation (and add the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
Chris Lockfort clock...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #7 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Ok, licenses is one of my weak points and I'm not sure you have all the bases
covered but I could definitely be wrong :)
Licenses detected in source:
$ licensecheck -r . | awk -F : '{
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #8 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Also, it's never OK to patch licenses. The bad FSF address is not considered a
blocker but it is recommended to at least tell upstream about it. You might as
well send them your patch.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #9 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Duh, I looked at your LICENSING file... never mind. But perhaps using the
guidelines version of the comment and file name would be good?
# For a breakdown of the licensing, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816124
--- Comment #38 from Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com ---
It should be in sync now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-pyudev-0.15-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pyudev-0.15-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785447
--- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org ---
Updated
Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Auth.spec
SRPM URL:
http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Auth-1.4.9-1.fc16.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785449
--- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org ---
Updated
Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Browser.spec
SRPM URL:
http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Browser-1.0.7-1.fc16.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #10 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Also, it's never OK to patch licenses. The bad FSF address is not considered
a blocker but it is recommended to at least tell upstream about it. You
might as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785450
--- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org ---
Updated
Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Cache.spec
SRPM URL:
http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Cache-1.0.5-1.fc16.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #11 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #8)
Also, it's never OK to patch licenses.[cut] You
might as well send them your patch.
Already done, see the comment attached to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785492
--- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org ---
Updated
Spec URL:
http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Controller.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #12 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #8)
Also, it's never OK to patch licenses.[cut] You
might as well send them your patch.
Already done,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785472
--- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org ---
Updated
Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Db.spec
SRPM URL:
http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Db-1.2.1-1.fc16.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826563
--- Comment #5 from kc8...@gmail.com ---
New Spec URL: http://kc8hfi.fedorapeople.org/fuelmanager.spec
New SRPM URL: http://kc8hfi.fedorapeople.org/fuelmanager-0.3.7-1.fc17.src.rpm
Scratch build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785463
--- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org ---
Updated
Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Form.spec
SRPM URL:
http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Form-1.1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #13 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
If you insist, I will certainly drop it. But I prefer to use it - it's a
question of keeping rpmlint output at a reasonable size. Without the patch, the
output is just insane.
And since
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #14 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Nah, good enough for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785466
--- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org ---
Updated
Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Http.spec
SRPM URL:
http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Http-1.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785468
--- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org ---
Updated
Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Image.spec
SRPM URL:
http://nb.fedorapeople.org/horde-reviews/php-horde-Horde-Image-1.0.10-1.fc16.src.rpm
--
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
