https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #21 from Brendan Jones ---
Try this:
%build
export OPTFLAGS="%{optflags}"
make PREFIX=%{_prefix} LIBDIR=%{_libdir} %{?_smp_mflags} -C libs
make PREFIX=%{_prefix} LIBDIR=%{_libdir} %{?_smp_mflags} -C apps
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
--- Comment #6 from vasc...@gmail.com ---
"rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in %install section created by rpmdev-newspec.
Should I manually remove it from all new specs created by rpmdev-newspec?
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/grive/maste
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #20 from Jørn Lomax ---
Updated spec:http://jvlomax.fedorapeople.org/packeging/zita-alsa-pcmi.spec
updated SRPM:
http://jvlomax.fedorapeople.org/packeging/zita-alsa-pcmi-0.2.0-5.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge ---
Vasiliy,
the project homepage is gone (http 404)
you should update it to match the new url: https://github.com/Grive/grive
If you're listing both
SPEC:
SRPM:
it's easier for a reviewer to tak
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806040
--- Comment #15 from jdekloe ---
A small addition.
During testing I also noticed that "Requires: proj-nad" works fine for the
python package. It refuses to install the pyproj rpm in case proj-nad is
absent.
However, the python3 rpm installs with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806040
--- Comment #14 from jdekloe ---
New spec and srpm files are here:
Spec URL: http://jdekloe.nl/Fedora/pyproj.spec
SRPM URL: http://jdekloe.nl/Fedora/pyproj-1.9.2-4.r298.fc16.src.rpm
The dot has been added as suggested, and I changed the version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834239
Bug ID: 834239
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #19 from Jørn Lomax ---
I created the patches by running the sed lines on the Makefiles on the
commandline, and modifying it so that it would take OPTFLAGS as an arguemnt. It
doesn't build though, i get the following error
> g++: err
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #18 from Jørn Lomax ---
Created attachment 593403
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=593403&action=edit
patch for sed line, libs version
This is to remove the sed lines from the .spec file. This removes the sed lines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #17 from Jørn Lomax ---
Created attachment 593402
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=593402&action=edit
Patch for sed line, apps version
This is to remove the sed lines from the .spec. This only takes care of the
/ap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818805
Brendan Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
--- Comment #4 from vasc...@gmail.com ---
Updated to 0.2.0
SRPM URL:
http://koji.russianfedora.ru/packages/grive/0.2.0/1.fc17.R/src/grive-0.2.0-1.fc17.R.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827167
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|0x |Package Review
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||package-review@lists.fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
--- Comment #1 from Marek Goldmann ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
maven-processor-plu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827167
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de
Bl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834127
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||827167
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511
--- Comment #4 from Ales Kozumplik ---
Uploaded next version:
http://akozumpl.fedorapeople.org/review/dnf_3/dnf.spec
http://akozumpl.fedorapeople.org/review/dnf_3/dnf-0.2.6-9.gitb4aa5c1.fc17.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks, some more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833353
--- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann ---
Patryk, did you repackage the source zip?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828732
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Runge ---
No response from upstream regarding feedstail/utils.py. or even regarding that
'patch'. I added a comment, what it does.
I'd tend to see utils.py as fork from the corresponding file in web.py
That file has
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833395
Andrew Elwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.elw...@gmail.com
Fla
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
