https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819687
Tomas Dabašinskas tdaba...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828732
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830750
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jbosgi-resolver1-1.0.13-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbosgi-resolver1-1.0.13-3.fc17
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829745
Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829329
Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830711
Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834991
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835028
Bug 835028 depends on bug 834991, which changed state.
Bug 834991 Summary: Review Request: perl-Paper-Specs - Size and layout
information for paper stock, forms, and labels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834991
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #15 from John Morris j...@zultron.com ---
There's a new specfile and RPM uploaded to the same links.
Updates:
- Install a pkg-config PyCXX.pc file
- Own /usr/share/python2.7/
- All rpmlint + fedora-review errors/warnings now silent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835804
Bug ID: 835804
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Depends On: 835062, 835544
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835062
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||835804
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835544
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||835804
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763
--- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4199373
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824334
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libkolabxml-0.6.0-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libkolabxml-0.6.0-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
Bug ID: 835823
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833853
--- Comment #4 from Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Naming: ok
1. MUST sources: Not ok, not verifiable. no upstream 0.3 tarball (yet?)
6d9a81c318193c2d3ec580b73ffa8886 libkolab-0.3.tar.gz
looks like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832999
Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835544
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||830677
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830677
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||830763
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #16 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
some drive by comments:
- imho, there's no need for obsoletes, there's no version to obsolete.
- buildrequires: python-devel should be python2-devel, or something like:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835544
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510
--- Comment #26 from nicolas.vievi...@univ-valenciennes.fr ---
Hello Community,
New upstream release (improvement in localization, but some strings need to
translated, and nfs shares added to drive section), and as usual new SPEC,
SRPMS files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835596
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835596
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835028
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
--- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
Thanks.
I was working on the package quite some time so I didn't notice the newest
version; I fixed the license (I guess I'm relying on pyp2rpm too much...), and
also URL.
Here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763
--- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835544
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com ---
perl(Pod::Parser) is already listed in requires and BRs contain it.
rpm -qp --requires perl-Pod-Markdown-1.320-1.fc18.src.rpm | grep Parser
perl(Pod::Parser)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835544
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835028
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835051
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763
--- Comment #6 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Removed bundles files.
Spec URL:
http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jbosgi-framework/1.1.8-3/jbosgi-framework.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835028
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818964
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: StaxMate - |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832803
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
*** Bug 823120 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823120
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832810
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822443
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822443
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
The latest upstream release is 2.6.4, but the packaged version is 2.6.3.
Please explain why simple-xml 2.6.3 was packaged instead of 2.6.4.
can you add maven pom and depmap?
pom file is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835596
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Data-Flow
Short Description: Perl extension for simple-minded recipe-controlled build of
data
Owners: ppisar jplesnik mmaslano
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822443
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[ ]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835544
--- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
perl(Pod::Parser) is already listed in requires and BRs contain it.
Ah, indeed it's fine on fc18; it didn't get detected on fc16, though.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822443
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
please remove all prebuilt jars with
find . -name *.jar -delete
and classes
find . -name *.class -delete
and javadoc
rm -rf javadoc/*
remove empty javadoc subpackage or build java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834239
--- Comment #7 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com ---
I always run rpmlint and mock before submiting an updated package. I'll admit i
only use the default mock configuration though. I'll make sure to run it on
both rawhide and stable from now
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834239
Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #594478|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
--- Comment #11 from Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
Ales, with your latest patch, the Requires generated seems fine.
Looking at the files included in the hawkey RPMS, one thing that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830278
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830278
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
clojure-maven-plugin-1.3.10-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clojure-maven-plugin-1.3.10-1.fc17
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834582
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828732
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832810
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835028
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835544
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835596
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833853
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835596
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835062
Bug 835062 depends on bug 835028, which changed state.
Bug 835028 Summary: Review Request: perl-pod2pdf - Converts Pod to PDF format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835028
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835028
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835596
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833853
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||835904
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835064
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835804
Bug 835804 depends on bug 835544, which changed state.
Bug 835544 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Markdown - Convert POD to Markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835544
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835544
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828429
Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||whe...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835910
Bug ID: 835910
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835064
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com ---
I tried to build the rpm on koji with perl 5.16, but it failed.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4200689
DProf.c:852:13: error: static declaration of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828879
Eric Sandeen esand...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835716
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Bierfert andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de ---
Yes this is intentional. I'd prefer a setup like wine-gecko but this is what
wine currently supports.
Here is the quote from: http://wiki.winehq.org/Mono
Unlike gecko,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833204
--- Comment #7 from Ross Delinger rossdy...@csh.rit.edu ---
python-pyramid is now at version 1.2.7 which unblocks this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835064
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for testing. Updated package is on the same address.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830677
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830677
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jbosgi-deployment-1.0.12-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbosgi-deployment-1.0.12-2.fc17
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jbosgi-framework-1.1.8-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbosgi-framework-1.1.8-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830677
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830750
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832420
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827917
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827917
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
eclipse-wtp-webservices-3.4.0-0.6.20120617cvs.fc17 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 17.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Bierfert andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de ---
http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw-wine-mono.spec
http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw-wine-mono-0.0.4-5.fc17.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828370
--- Comment #5 from Anderson Silva ansi...@redhat.com ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-comment_bonus_api.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-comment_bonus_api-1.0-4.fc16.src.rpm
Thanks,
AS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #17 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #16)
some drive by comments:
- imho, there's no need for obsoletes, there's no version to obsolete.
I did some searching and it doesn't exist in Fedora but it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294
Michael Shigorin shigo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shigo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828993
Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #18 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
(In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #16)
some drive by comments:
- imho, there's no need for obsoletes, there's no version to obsolete.
I did some searching
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836014
Bug ID: 836014
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836014
Julian Leyh jul...@vgai.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||712332
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836014
Julian Leyh jul...@vgai.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||834747, 810676
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834747
Julian Leyh jul...@vgai.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||836014
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810676
Julian Leyh jul...@vgai.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||836014
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833395
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Elwell andrew.elw...@gmail.com ---
Hi Laurence,
Working on the package review for this - The description is far too terse. It
doesn't provide me with enough info to work out *what* I can use this package
for -- for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833395
Andrew Elwell andrew.elw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
