https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832007
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #22 from John Morris ---
Woo hoo, I'm a packager! Thank you Matthias.
(In reply to comment #20)
> Or course one of the big differences with packaging for a distro vs.
> packaging for yourself is you have to be more rigorous and unam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
--- Comment #6 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Yepp, taking this one.
>
> John,
>
> I guess (I'm nearly 100% sure), Slavek is targeting towards F18;
> python-fuzzywuzzy and python-sure are built and pushed to rawhi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #21 from Matthias Runge -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
--- Comment #13 from Scott Tsai ---
Ales,
while I have your attention I'll raise a few issue non-packaging related issues
that I see in hawkey:
1. You don't tag your releases in git.
Instead you seem to commit a change to hawkey.spec in upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
--- Comment #12 from Scott Tsai ---
This review is against the latest .spec file in hawkey git:
1. Remove python2 from BuildRequires
python2-devel pulls it in anyway.
-BuildRequires: python2 python2-devel
+BuildRequires: python2-devel
2. Remov
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #11 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
Orcan Ogetbil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
--- Comment #4 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hi Bohuslav,
>
> There's no 'python-django' package in Fedora. Did you mean 'Django'?
>
Yes, it is. Django has been renamed to python-django beginning with F18 - see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
I have updated the package as per your suggestion, the doc/Examples/make.bat is
removed.
I also strip bin/clm, as a debuginfo package is not usefull, but disabling that
also disables the stripping.
New
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828993
--- Comment #4 from John Morris ---
Hi Benedikt, here are a few issues, the first detected by fedora-review, the
rest I found myself. Be sure to check the attached review. I checked most of
the items, but left a few blank.
[!]: MUST Package do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828993
--- Comment #3 from John Morris ---
Created attachment 595172
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=595172&action=edit
fedora-review for l3afpad
Output of fedora-review; Items marked with a capital "X" are items I checked
manually
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821771
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-edown-0.3.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-edown-0.3.0-1.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821802
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-erlando-2.8.2-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-erlando-2.8.2-2.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #20 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Hi fellas,
>
> New package:
> http://www.zultron.com/static/2012/06/freecad/python-pycxx.spec
> http://www.zultron.com/static/2012/06/freecad/python-pycxx-6.2.4-1.fc16.src.
> rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828993
--- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert ---
Yes, l3afpad is not leafpad but a fork of it that builds against GTK3 and
includes some bugfixes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833154
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|835338 |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835338
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Depends On|833
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833154
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|833641 |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833641
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|833154 |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833641
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||836404, 836400
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836404
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||836403
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836400
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||836403
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836400
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||836404
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836404
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||836400
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836404
Bug ID: 836404
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
Bug ID: 836403
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836400
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836400
Bug ID: 836400
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824083
--- Comment #5 from Ricky Elrod ---
[ok] - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
[ok] - Spec file matches base package name.
[ok] - Spec has consistant macro usage.
[ok] - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
[ok - NCSA] - License
[ok] - License f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
John Morris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@zultron.com
--- Comment #3 from John
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828993
John Morris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@zultron.com
--- Comment #1 from John
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824976
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
=== Issues ===
1. You're placing jars in glassfish directory, but this dir is not owned by
any package. There are only 2 jar files, so you don't need to put them
into subdir; simply put both files in %
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808258
--- Comment #13 from Andy Grover ---
Hi Ralph, thanks to you and amoffat, upstream released an updated tarball that
should be 100% "sh" with no "pbs". Updated .spec and srpms:
spec: http://fedorapeople.org/~grover/new/python-sh.spec
srpm: http:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824083
Ricky Elrod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836368
Bug ID: 836368
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #19 from John Morris ---
Hi fellas,
New package:
http://www.zultron.com/static/2012/06/freecad/python-pycxx.spec
http://www.zultron.com/static/2012/06/freecad/python-pycxx-6.2.4-1.fc16.src.rpm
Bunch of changes:
- Python 3 package,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836362
Bug ID: 836362
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835089
--- Comment #11 from Simon A. Erat ---
Reviewing foreign package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836014
--- Comment #6 from Björn Persson ---
Oh, and the recommended suffix for a documentation subpackage is "-doc",
without an S.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836014
--- Comment #5 from Björn Persson ---
Sorry Peter if I stole your review. Since I had been working on Templates
Parser I figured I should submit the notes I had.
(In reply to comment #3)
> Should the documentation go into a separate subpackage?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
--- Comment #6 from Simon A. Erat ---
rpm2cpio kde-base-artwork-4.8.90-1.fc17.src.rpm | cpio -idmv
Review Update & Additions:
--
? Could not check for forbidden .la libtool archives: Invalid Source0
+ No forbidden .la l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832007
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832007
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832007
Paweł Forysiuk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tuxa...@o2.pl
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832007
Paweł Forysiuk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tuxa...@o2.pl
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
--- Comment #5 from Simon A. Erat ---
Ok, please fix it and re-upload specfile and source package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
--- Comment #4 from Simon A. Erat ---
First time doing a review, experienced Reviewer: please review the rebiew.
rpmlint kde-base-artwork-4.8.90-1.fc17.src.rpm
kde-base-artwork.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
kde-base-artwork.src: W:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter ---
URL typo, *should* have "unstable" instead of "stable" in there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review maili
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
Simon A. Erat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Simon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833855
--- Comment #7 from Jef Spaleta ---
Hey, just a heads up it seems you might want to talk with the systemd-devels
about console-setup integration with systemd.
Relevant message from relevant thread:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
Simon A. Erat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||erat.si...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820548
Patryk Obara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pob...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686
--- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
I was just about to propose the exact same thing about the package naming :)
I'm +1 to use the package name wine-mono given the situation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824976
--- Comment #4 from Patryk Obara ---
[x] Rpmlint output
(I forgot to change it from review of release 1)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824976
--- Comment #3 from Patryk Obara ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint glassfish-toplink-essentials.spec
glassfish-toplink-essentials.spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830777
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830777
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824976
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/glassfish-toplink-essentials/2/glassfish-toplink-essentials.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/glassfish-toplink-essentials/2/glassfish-toplink-essentials-2.0.46-2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824976
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/glassfish-toplink-essentials/2/glassfish-toplink-essentials.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/glassfish-toplink-essentials/2/glassfish-toplink-essentials-2.0.46-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830287
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830287
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823056
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823044
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
php-symfony2-CssSelector-2.0.15-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823017
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-gtknode-0.32-2.20110310git19ddfd5.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL
6 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823042
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
php-symfony2-Config-2.0.15-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823073
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818297
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
fedmsg-0.2.0-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823065
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817303
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
php-symfony2-Yaml-2.0.15-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817302
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
php-twig-Twig-1.8.2-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824976
Patryk Obara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pob...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826645
Patryk Obara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pob...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Clean - The |Review Request: clean - The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832443
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
jbosgi-repository-1.0.5-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbosgi-repository-1.0.5-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833204
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pyramid-tm-0.4-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pyramid-tm-0.4-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833204
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Thank you!
Should I (according to the "How to get sponsored into the packager group" wiki
page) try to contact current sponsors (by IRC) or review, or do you have
contacts for that purpose?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835051
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835062
Bug 835062 depends on bug 835051, which changed state.
Bug 835051 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install-AutoLicense -
Module::Install extension to automatically generate LICENSE files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835051
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829726
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
--- Comment #8 from Paul Wouters ---
Package is APPROVED. Now let's get you a sponsor
All listed issues above addressed. Mock builds. Compiling and running a small
test program works. rpmlint warnings understood and ok:
clean.src: W: name-repe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829726
Alexey I. Froloff changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Alex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829726
Andreas Bierfert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from An
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833353
--- Comment #5 from Patryk Obara ---
Spec URL:
http://dreamertan.fedorapeople.org/srpm/ws-xmlschema/2.0.2-2.fc17/ws-xmlschema.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dreamertan.fedorapeople.org/srpm/ws-xmlschema/2.0.2-2.fc17/ws-xmlschema-2.0.2-2.fc17.src.rpm
Scr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835051
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833411
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Removed baz, not a valid FAS account.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832443
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Bierfert ---
I am fine with it either way. However, if we decide on wine-mono we should
rename the gecko stuff accordingly...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835051
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Jitka
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835051
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
perl(Module::Install::GithubMeta) is required for Makefile.PL, because it uses
the function githubmeta.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835089
--- Comment #10 from Simon A. Erat ---
Update:
---
Since the package is very small, I reconsidered to make the rpm not
relocatable.
Further, as i consider it alpha, changed the specfile accordingly.
Upstream:
-
Spec: http://sea.hosti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835051
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Petr Ša
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832446
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
arquillian-osgi-1.0.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/arquillian-osgi-1.0.2-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833411
Stef Walter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Stef Walt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835617
--- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Initial notes:
>
>
> See the following for proper git snapshot versioning.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
>
Corrected to i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832439
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
jbosgi-resolver-2.0.0-0.2.Beta2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbosgi-resolver-2.0.0-0.2.Beta2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
