https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
--- Comment #12 from Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com ---
This review is against the latest .spec file in hawkey git:
1. Remove python2 from BuildRequires
python2-devel pulls it in anyway.
-BuildRequires: python2 python2-devel
+BuildRequires:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
--- Comment #13 from Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com ---
Ales,
while I have your attention I'll raise a few issue non-packaging related issues
that I see in hawkey:
1. You don't tag your releases in git.
Instead you seem to commit a change to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
--- Comment #6 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Yepp, taking this one.
John,
I guess (I'm nearly 100% sure), Slavek is targeting towards F18;
python-fuzzywuzzy and python-sure are built and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #22 from John Morris j...@zultron.com ---
Woo hoo, I'm a packager! Thank you Matthias.
(In reply to comment #20)
Or course one of the big differences with packaging for a distro vs.
packaging for yourself is you have to be more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832007
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
--- Comment #7 from John Morris j...@zultron.com ---
Hi Bohuslav,
I was shooting around to do an informal review, since I'm learning the ropes
around here, and thought this package looked cool. Don't do anything special
for me, but I'll be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835064
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832178
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
forgot to add: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5231
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
--- Comment #14 from Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #12)
This review is against the latest .spec file in hawkey git:
I've uploaded a copy of hawkey.spec with my recommended changes above here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
--- Comment #15 from Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Ales,
while I have your attention I'll raise a few issue non-packaging related
issues that I see in hawkey:
1. You don't tag your releases in git.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
--- Comment #8 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Hi Bohuslav,
I was shooting around to do an informal review, since I'm learning the ropes
around here, and thought this package looked cool. Don't do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
--- Comment #17 from Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com ---
APPROVED.
Thank you for the review and the patches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825825
Bug 825825 depends on bug 829804, which changed state.
Bug 829804 Summary: Add Maven POMs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829804
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
--- Comment #19 from Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Best of luck on improving package management in Fedora.
BTW, where is a good place to discuss hawkey and dnf development?
I'd like to know more about the problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825825
Bug 825825 depends on bug 829804, which changed state.
Bug 829804 Summary: Add Maven POMs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829804
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825825
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825825
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
struts-1.3.10-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/struts-1.3.10-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
--- Comment #20 from Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #17)
Best of luck on improving package management in Fedora.
BTW, where is a good place to discuss hawkey and dnf development?
I'd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827809
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827809
--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
First of all it FTBFS in Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4207113
Michel, could you please take a look on this. It fails during unit-testing -
maybe there are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831878
Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpope...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836521
Bug ID: 836521
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
No need to request f18, devel is automatic.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835823
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836521
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828746
Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpope...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828746
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825414
Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpope...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827809
--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@sylvestre.me ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Michel, could you please take a look on this. It fails during unit-testing -
maybe there are some missing BuildRequires?
Hi Peter - thanks for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Your build failure here is due to lack of a default build environment, try
yum groupinstall buildsys-build
first
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
--- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Spec URL:
http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kde-base-artwork/kde-base-artwork.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kde-base-artwork/kde-base-artwork-4.8.95-1.fc17.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827809
--- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is silent (except false positives about spelling):
work ~/Desktop: rpmlint genbackupdata-1.6-2.fc17.*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827809
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
--- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Another try
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4207494
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828746
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836521
Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836521
--- Comment #3 from Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-setuptools_git
Short Description: Setuptools revision control system plugin for Git
Owners: apevec
Branches: f16 f17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
--- Comment #10 from Simon A. Erat erat.si...@gmail.com ---
Review Update:
--
- Source0
+ Source0 fixed
- Build fails (See below)
+ Build succeeds
Review passed, no more blockers.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
--- Comment #11 from Simon A. Erat erat.si...@gmail.com ---
ACCEPT
But cant set fedora-review flag to: +
Since i'm no proven packager.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836521
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824052
--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
any update here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821247
--- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
any update here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824061
--- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
any update here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824057
--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
any update here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827745
--- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
any update here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827709
--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
any update here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773492
Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpope...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834070
Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|j...@di.uminho.pt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834070
--- Comment #1 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt ---
Daryl,
This is quick first review:
Blocker:
* The tarball isn't published by the upstream project [1].
A note in the specfile explaining how it is generated should be imperative
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836587
Bug ID: 836587
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836587
--- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Note to reviewer : target is fedora = 16 and EPEL = 5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834070
--- Comment #2 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt ---
This is annoying:
* You are not authorized to access bug #450912.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805304
Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpope...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834070
--- Comment #3 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Daryl,
This is quick first review:
Blocker:
* The tarball isn't published by the upstream project [1].
A note in the specfile explaining how it is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817246
Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpope...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807867
Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpope...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812121
Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpope...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808258
Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836014
--- Comment #7 from Julian Leyh jul...@vgai.de ---
updated the package.
Spec file: http://vgai.de/fedora/2012-06-28/templates_parser.spec
SRPM: http://vgai.de/fedora/2012-06-28/templates_parser-11.6.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
koji build f17:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #24 from John Morris j...@zultron.com ---
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review!
(In reply to comment #23)
One note, there seems to be a typo in the Source0: tag...
Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #25 from John Morris j...@zultron.com ---
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review!
(In reply to comment #23)
One note, there seems to be a typo in the Source0: tag...
Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #26 from John Morris j...@zultron.com ---
(Whoops, diregard comment 24, incorrect link; comment 25 is correct)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #27 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #24)
(Funny, the 'prdownloads' link actually works for me (no timeout), but
looking at SF's CXX pages, the 'downloads' link is the one I see.)
It's probably just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
John Morris j...@zultron.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808258
Andy Grover agro...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #29 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-pycxx
Short Description: Write Python extensions in C++
Owners: zultron mrunge
Branches: f16 f17
InitialCC: hobbes1069
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724883
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724883
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: biomaj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #30 from John Morris j...@zultron.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-pycxx
Short Description: Write Python extensions in C++
Owners: zultron mrunge
Branches: f16 f17
InitialCC: hobbes1069
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808258
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for letting me know.
That has been fixed now.
New SPEC: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/packages/Clean/clean-5.spec
New SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #15 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Ok, now that the whole freecad, pycxx, zipios issues on my end are done, time
to get back to this. Working on the full review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830277
--- Comment #11 from pierrejourda...@gmail.com ---
At this point I have finised the packaging of this software and it can be
submited for review process .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686
Andreas Bierfert andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
--- Comment #13 from Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com ---
Patrick: until the new sponsor method takes effect, I can't help you get a
sponsor. You can try asking on #fedora-devel or on the mailing list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800930
--- Comment #55 from Martin Erik Werner martinerikwer...@gmail.com ---
This now having passed testing-verification, so I figured I'd say a somewhat
overdue thank you to everyone who helped me along in packaging RE, especially
for reviewing and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808258
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808258
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-sh-0.107-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sh-0.107-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808258
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-sh-0.107-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sh-0.107-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808258
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-sh-0.107-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sh-0.107-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
--- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
To which new sponsor method do you refer? We already made a bunch of changes
to the process a few weeks ago and to my knowledge there are no further changes
proposed.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
--- Comment #15 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com ---
I will ask on #fedora-devel for someone who would want to sponsor me.
I have found out that there was an issue in the previous build which would make
it impossible to import StdEnv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #16 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Ok, a couple of nit-picks:
1. The source tag could use the %name and %version tags a little more:
Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
John Morris j...@zultron.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #33 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Usually I would leave it at the default which means it has to sit in the
testing repos for a week, however, as freecad is the only package that will use
this currently, setting it to 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753577
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ti...@math.uh.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #17 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Ok, a couple of nit-picks:
1. The source tag could use the %name and %version tags a little more:
Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753452
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ti...@math.uh.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #18 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #16)
Ok, a couple of nit-picks:
1. The source tag could use the %name and %version tags a little more:
Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734248
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ti...@math.uh.edu
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836521
Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755065
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BuildFails |
--
You are
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo