https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812659
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838362
Mario Santagiuliana fed...@marionline.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838362
robyd...@fedoraonline.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829809
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791233
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511
--- Comment #14 from Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com ---
I removed some of the useless files in 3544ca1d9c1a18825ba3034cd153bd3571d5dae8
and now I am down to these:
yum/sqlutils.py : GPLv2
yum/misc.py : unknown
yum/parser.py : unknown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511
Roman Rakus rra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rra...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836362
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718430
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830155
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827809
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827808
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511
Zdeněk Pavlas zpav...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511
Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837268
--- Comment #1 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com ---
SPECS/CardManager.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
RPMS/noarch/CardManager-1-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
CardManager.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816927
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816927
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
fest-reflect-1.3-7.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fest-reflect-1.3-7.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812384
Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maths...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810010
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=83
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838540
Bug ID: 838540
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820548
--- Comment #4 from Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com ---
Hmm, after your changes license tag is: LGPLv3+ and GPL+ and MIT
but if you repackaged source as I suggested and removed lib directory from
tarball, it would be only LGPLv3+, which would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825750
Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pob...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825750
--- Comment #2 from Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
rpmlint tiles.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188
--- Comment #4 from Sebastien Caps sebastien.c...@guardis.com ---
$ rpmlint ./reprepro.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
New SPEC:
http://virer.net/repo/raw/reprepro.spec
New SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=83
--- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
SPECS/cxf.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820548
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jasperreports/2/jasperreports.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jasperreports/2/jasperreports-4.0.2-2.fc16.src.rpm
- fix license tag
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825750
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
=== Issues ===
1. Package doesn't own all directories it creates;
replace line 160 with %{_javadir}/%{name} to fix that
- done
2. Why version 2.2.2 is packaged instead of 3.0.0?
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838568
Bug ID: 838568
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838568
Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmosk...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820548
Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820548
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825750
--- Comment #4 from Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com ---
*** APPROVED ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825750
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724864
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-flask-openid-1.0.1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-flask-openid-1.0.1-3.fc17
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724864
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819134
Jay Dobies jason.dob...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ti...@math.uh.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724864
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-flask-openid-1.0.1-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-flask-openid-1.0.1-3.fc16
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838608
Bug ID: 838608
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836362
Matt Spaulding mspauldin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826647
--- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Issues:
1) web/WEB-INF/web-app_2_3.dtd file is non-free and it cannot be
distributed with Fedora. This file needs to be removed from the source
tarball.
2) spelling errors in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819264
--- Comment #21 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
I just made a post to Macaulay2 google groups asking for some feedback about
updating/using factory and libfac 3.1.3, and posted a link to the bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838621
Bug ID: 838621
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #35 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
thanks Alec for the patches.
%changelog
* Mon Jul 9 2012 Martin Gansser linux4mar...@gmx.de 2.1.1-9.fc17
- added multilib wrapper script free-solid-config to use pkg-config
- updated FreeSOLID
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826647
--- Comment #4 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
felix-osgi-foundation was listed above by mistake. Obviously it's not needed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826647
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/sslext/1/sslext.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/sslext/1/sslext-1.2-2.fc16.src.rpm
- removed non-free file
- fixed spelling errors in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819134
--- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Why did you reset the owner of this ticket to nobody?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819134
Jay Dobies jason.dob...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826647
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826647
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #36 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Package Review (informal, see next comment)
===
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830398
Kushal Das k...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(kushaldas@gmail.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #37 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
I see no more than in the review. However, I have obviously not the sharpest
eyes here, so I wait with assign/approve to give e. g. Ralf and Volker an
opportunity to be heard and/or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812659
--- Comment #13 from David Levine par.packa...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~levine/par/par-1.52-7.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~levine/par/par-1.52-7.fc17.src.rpm
I had already gone back and forth on the -s.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511
--- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
(In reply to comment #15)
From my POV the licensing is OK now.
Correctly listed all licenses and used Public Domain license for not
licensed files.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819264
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||Singular
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812659
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511
--- Comment #19 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no ---
Indeed, I would say files without license should have license according to
COPYING (GPLv2).
I guess that is the reason for the COPYING file in the first place?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830812
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830812
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
paulstretch-2.2.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/paulstretch-2.2.2-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830812
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
paulstretch-2.2.2-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/paulstretch-2.2.2-2.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819264
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819264
--- Comment #24 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
oh, in case you aren't psychic:
FAS username: rdieter
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812659
--- Comment #15 from David Levine par.packa...@gmail.com ---
Thank you.
I verified that I don't have any ~/.rpm* files. I'm running vanilla Fedora 17
on an older Pentium. uname -a reports it as an i686:
Linux sna 3.3.4-5.fc17.i686 #1 SMP Mon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812659
--- Comment #16 from David Levine par.packa...@gmail.com ---
Disregard Comment 15. I installed redhat-rpm-config and now rpmbuild --showrc
reports the build arch as an i686.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812659
--- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
I do hope you know that you should be doing test builds in mock or in our
buildsystem. Doing local builds does not properly test buildability.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838423
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837694
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-tahrir-0.1.5-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tahrir-0.1.5-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835015
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
Bug ID: 838675
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738744
Bug 738744 depends on bug 832886, which changed state.
Bug 832886 Summary: Update to latest v8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832886
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||836032
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||837744
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #38 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
%changelog
* Mon Jul 9 2012 Martin Gansser linux4mar...@gmx.de 2.1.1-10.fc17
- updated fsf-fix patch
Spec URL:
http://dev.speed-dreams.org/Martin/FreeSOLID.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com ---
No, this must be python3-beautifulsoup as the relevant ABI in the python3 one
here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
--- Comment #2 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no ---
Sorry, I don't understand, the package provide bs4 for python and python3.
bs3 is left untounced as python2 only package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
--- Comment #3 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no ---
That was of course: the package provide bs4 for python2 and python3.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819099
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837694
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-tahrir-0.1.6-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tahrir-0.1.6-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
--- Comment #5 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no ---
There are some info here:
http://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/bs4/doc/#porting-code-to-bs4
Don't seems like a drop in replacement to me.
Debian also have two packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #39 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
No, thats not the way. See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address.
Revert the changes in the patch, license files can't be edited for legal
reasons.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807479
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834098
Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837689
--- Comment #8 from Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com ---
After upgrading tablib, I'm no longer getting those 'NoneType object has no
attribute 'debug', but I'm still getting those PrettyTable instance has no
attribute 'align' errors when trying to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837689
Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||837087
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819264
pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819264
--- Comment #26 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #22)
Dan replied upstream, and I'm satisfied with the reply, we can continue with
this review (and sort out the M2 issues afterward).
For example,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831878
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831878
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org ---
(In reply to comment #2)
%doc %{_mandir}/man8/engine-log-collector.8.gz
Ah and while we are at it:
It would be best to include this as engine-log-collector.8.* so the format of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831878
--- Comment #4 from Keith Robertson krobe...@redhat.com ---
Pong, been on PTO. I'll review the suggestions tomorrow and respond. Cheers
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812659
--- Comment #18 from David Levine par.packa...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: par
Short Description: Paragraph reformatter, vaguely like fmt, but more elaborate
Owners: levined
Branches:
InitialCC:
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812659
David Levine par.packa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/Zukiwi/2012.07.10/zukiwi.spec
SRPM URL:
http://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/Zukiwi/2012.07.10/zukiwi-20120709-1.fc17.src.rpm
Rpmlint returns:
$ rpmlint $NAME.spec ../RPMS/*/*$NAME*.rpm ../SRPMS/$NAME*.rpm
gnome-shell-theme-zukiwi.noarch: E: explicit-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838720
Bug ID: 838720
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838722
Bug ID: 838722
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838722
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgold...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767649
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
--- Comment #8 from Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org ---
One obvious issue with the build that I see at
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5865/4225865/build.log
is that Racket uses its own copy of libffi -- my guess is that there's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #40 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
The public header files under include are not installed by 'make install'
Inline patch to fix:
diff -U2 FreeSOLID.spec.ORG FreeSOLID.spec
--- FreeSOLID.spec.ORG2012-07-09
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo