https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838780
Bug ID: 838780
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838780
Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838780
Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||827975
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832353
--- Comment #4 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Net-Dropbox-API
Short Description: A dropbox API interface
Owners: cheeselee
Branches: f16 f17
InitialCC: perl-sig
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822046
--- Comment #10 from vasc...@gmail.com ---
Thanks to all.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767649
--- Comment #25 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
(In reply to comment #22)
Oops, I didn't realise Nelson needed a sponsor. I think in that case the
review is supposed to be done by the sponsor. But since this one is done
now, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
--- Comment #6 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
I will review this package
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
--- Comment #7 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[!]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
--- Comment #8 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint python-beautifulsoup4-4.1.1-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
python-beautifulsoup4.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-html5lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
--- Comment #9 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
%package -n python3-beautifulsoup4
Obsoletes: python3-BeautifulSoup 1:4.1.0-1
I can't find python3-BeautifulSoup 1:4.1.0-1 in the Fedora packages, the
last version in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #43 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
Created attachment 597228
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=597228action=edit
Patch against *-10
This patch is the diff of my local version against Martin's *-10.
It
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838780
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838780
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||Ready
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838801
Bug ID: 838801
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838801
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838801
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|Ready
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #83 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #82)
(In reply to comment #80)
export ACLOCAL_FLAGS=-I /usr/local/share/aclocal/
export
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #84 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #81)
Leigh,
I sent you an email. I'm finding MATE and Cinnamon to be quite similar in
the way they were written and the way they are built.
I have just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #44 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Thanks. It's a pleasure to work with you... Noting the Name: is still 'Free
Solid'
Another finding: the library name is libFreeSOLID-2.1.1.so.0*, not the expected
libFreeSOLID.so.0*.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838801
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #45 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
The build is the build of speed-dreams, the upcoming client...
Maybe you could attach qhull.pc in this bug, just to shortcut testing until the
update hit the repos?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838722
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767649
--- Comment #26 from Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: lcm
Short Description: Lightweight communications and marshaling
Owners: nmarques mrunge dcallagh
Branches: el5 el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838722
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[!]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #46 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 597255
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=597255action=edit
Don't encode version in library name
Set library name to FreeSOLID instead of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749291
Ricardo Rocha rocha.po...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838540
David Cameron d.g.came...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838870
Bug ID: 838870
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838801
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||838870
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838870
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||838801
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838870
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838720
Vinzenz Vietzke viet...@b1-systems.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: ttfautohint |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838720
Vinzenz Vietzke viet...@b1-systems.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825750
Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825750
Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
--- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com ---
Even though the hackage page doesn't mention it, the Agda stdlib are required
for Agda-executable:
http://wiki.portal.chalmers.se/agda/agda.php?n=Libraries.StandardLibrary
These
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785371
--- Comment #38 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 597314
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=597314action=edit
pkgconfig.patch update
Updated with parts of Ralf's patch
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785371
--- Comment #39 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 597315
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=597315action=edit
freesolid.config.patch update
Updated w parts of Ralf's patch
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #597182|0 |1
is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #49 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #45)
The build is the build of speed-dreams, the upcoming client...
Maybe you could attach qhull.pc in this bug, just to shortcut testing until
the update hit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #48 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 597317
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=597317action=edit
freesolid.config.patch update
Updated with parts of Ralf's patch.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785371
--- Comment #40 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
PLease ignore comment #38 and #39 and their attachments. They were aimed for
FreeSOLID (!)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #50 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 597318
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=597318action=edit
Remaining parts of Rallf's patch + my patch in comment #39 - Makefile.am
This is a new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #597317|0 |1
is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838870
--- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
* Rename %{fedorarel} to %{release}
- Not a show stopper, but the %{release} macro is supported by
rpmdev-bumpspec,
so the updated release is not appended at the end of Release string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838901
Bug ID: 838901
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #597318|0 |1
is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838901
Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jla...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #597320|0 |1
is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #597316|0 |1
is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823835
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836362
--- Comment #10 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: rubygem-cinch
Short Description: An IRC Bot Building Framework
Owners: mcpierce
Branches: f17 f18
InitialCC: mcpierce
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823170
Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838621
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838621
--- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk ---
* Correctly named
* Packing latest version
* License is correctly specified and a free license
* SPEC file clean and legible
- Distribution link broken!
CPAN one does not exist:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823862
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823847
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823847
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838621
--- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut mma...@redhat.com ---
Thank you for your comments. New SRPM
http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-ServiceNow-API/perl-ServiceNow-API-1.01-2.el6.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838621
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823847
--- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Fails to build in mock because some tests fail.
[junit] Running org.osjava.sj.memory.SharedMemoryTest
[junit] Testsuite: org.osjava.sj.memory.SharedMemoryTest
[junit] Tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838621
Marek Mahut mma...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823170
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com ---
[jonathan@jdlaptop SPECS]$ rpmlint leveldb.spec
leveldb.spec: W: patch-not-applied Patch3:
leveldb-0003-Woarkaround-for-PowerPC-bloom-test-FIXME.patch
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819264
--- Comment #27 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
rdieter, maybe the fedora-cvs request was not yet processed because you did not
do a full fedora-review :-) The package is mine, so, not changing the generated
review:
$
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831705
--- Comment #6 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Looks good, Petr!
This package is APPROVED.
Thanks, Dan!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831705
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823170
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package does not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819264
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823847
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
strange here don't happen
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4230442
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #85 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
I've been in contact with Wolfgang.
It's not formally packaged.
I guess you didn't find my comments helpful.
Ok.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838971
Bug ID: 838971
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819264
--- Comment #29 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
Ops, you are right, when slitting file by file and dir by dir in subpackages I
forgot a %dir %{singulardir} in the main package, I think not required to
upload a new srpm, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #571351|0 |1
is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739088
--- Comment #14 from Maros Zatko mza...@redhat.com ---
so let's continue this saga:
SRPM: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/arandr-0.1.6-1.fc17.src.rpm
SPEC: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/arandr.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=83
--- Comment #3 from Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
http://dreamertan.fedorapeople.org/srpm/cxf/2.4.8-1.fc17/cxf.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dreamertan.fedorapeople.org/srpm/cxf/2.4.8-1.fc17/cxf-2.4.8-1.fc17.src.rpm
Issues:
1, 2: bloody
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739088
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739088
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #52 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Note that when adding patch in comment #50, the changes introduces in comment
#40 should be reverted (since make install now install all required headers)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838901
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823234
--- Comment #4 from Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Dan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823234
Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=83
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=83
Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823236
--- Comment #4 from Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.com ---
Dan, here are the new files after fixing the issues,
Spec URL: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/sugar-recall/sugar-recall.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739088
Maros Zatko mza...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825496
Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #86 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #85)
I've been in contact with Wolfgang.
It's not formally packaged.
I suggested this as it saves duplication of work.
I guess you didn't find my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #87 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Again,
My intention was not talk about Mate here. My intention was to help you with
Cinnamon.
I looked at your spec file and tried to build.
Considering it's taken you 7 months and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823835
--- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
SPECS/serp.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826645
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820548
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #88 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #87)
Again,
My intention was not talk about Mate here. My intention was to help you with
Cinnamon.
I looked at your spec file and tried to build.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #89 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Apology accepted.
I will look for you on IRC.
Thanks,
Dan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724864
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836521
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo