https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832471
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Ji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830664
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Pete
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840050
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Steve Tr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833395
Laurence Field changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Laurenc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837213
Radek Novacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830664
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829971
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Pete
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831749
--- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to comment #5)
* You can use %{gem_spec}, %{gem_cache} and %{gem_docdir} macros instead of
paths such as %{gem_dir}/cache/%{gem_name}-%{version}.gem,
%{gem_dir}/specifications/%{gem_name}-%{version}.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741529
Simone Caronni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Simo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829971
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823171
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840050
Ricardo Rocha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Ricar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831929
--- Comment #3 from vasc...@gmail.com ---
1. Added desktop file validate.
2. Scriptlet added.
3. BR gcc-c++ removed.
4. All changed to %{buildroot}
5. Changelog corrected.
6. Added patch correcting FSF address in sources
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821404
--- Comment #7 from vasc...@gmail.com ---
"Плагин" is the russian translate of "plugin".
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BD - in russian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plug-in_(computing) - in english
It is correct tra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
python-beautifulsoup4-4.1.1-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-beautifulsoup4-4.1.1-2.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-beautifulsoup4-4.1.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-beautifulsoup4-4.1.1-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741529
--- Comment #5 from Terje Røsten ---
Thanks!
Updated package:
spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-futures/python-futures.spec
srpm:
http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-futures/python-futures-2.1.2-2.fc16.src.rpm
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840374
Bug ID: 840374
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedo
201 - 219 of 219 matches
Mail list logo