https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #67 from raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de ---
(In reply to comment #65)
@raveit and comment #67, I personally do not think we should care in Fedora
about user of non official repo, yes. For example, Fedora do not care about
breaking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #68 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
LOL
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315
--- Comment #27 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
Ok! Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812559
--- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Just a reminder
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #69 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #66)
Leigh,
Fixed
SPEC:
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/mate-doc-utils.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839744
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760696
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #70 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Leigh,
Fixed
SPEC:
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/mate-doc-utils.spec
SRPM:
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/mate-doc-utils-1.4.0-12.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #72 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Leigh!
Now I owe you one!
Dan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #73 from Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com ---
Forgive me for a dumb question... But why do you have a dependency on
'scrollkeeper' and then disable it in configure ('--disable-scrollkeeper'); do
you really require that dependency
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #74 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: mate-doc-utils
Short Description: MATE Desktop doc utils
Owners: vicodan
Branches: f16 f17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
Bug ID: 842570
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
--- Comment #1 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com ---
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4325140
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Bug ID: 842633
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832677
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||840358
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840878
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
--- Comment #9 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
I have updated the package to relocate the udev rules.
SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/rtirq-20120505-3.fc17.src.rpm
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/rtirq.spec
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836850
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836850
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315
--- Comment #28 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #26)
I have some concerns.
First, there's a mix of various versions of LPGL and GPL, among others.
These are not all necessarily compatible. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842328
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784145
Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
--- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
- rpmlint is NOT silent
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint
/home/petro/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rtirq-20120505-3.fc18.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836850
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #75 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842328
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #76 from Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com ---
Obsoletes: mate-doc-utils-stylesheets %{version}
Provides: mate-doc-utils-stylesheets = %{version}
This could still be improved to:
Obsoletes: mate-doc-utils-stylesheets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #77 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #76)
Obsoletes: mate-doc-utils-stylesheets %{version}
Provides: mate-doc-utils-stylesheets = %{version}
This could still be improved to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842337
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842667
Bug ID: 842667
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842667
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||809950
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||842667
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842667
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832677
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
--- Comment #4 from Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com ---
[ltinkl@goblin 842296]$ rpmlint
kde-plasma-akonadi-calendars-0.1.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
kde-plasma-akonadi-calendars.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) plasmoid -
plasma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818943
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
--- Comment #5 from Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com ---
- the correct URL seems to be:
http://kde-look.org/CONTENT/content-files/150034-150034-akonadi-calendars.tar.bz2
- no newline at the end of specfile
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
--- Comment #11 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Peter.
OK - changed to %_prefix/lib .
Default on is intended,
The service is not run as a daemon so no need for the subsys lock.
New SPEC and SRPM:
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842679
Bug ID: 842679
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842679
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
--- Comment #6 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com ---
New:
Spec URL:
http://phoenix.inf.upol.cz/~grulichj/rpmbuild/SPECS/kde-plasma-akonadi-calendars.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842337
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
--- Comment #7 from Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com ---
License tag from .spec file (GPLv2+) doesn't match the actual source code
license (GPLv3+)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842337
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842328
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
--- Comment #8 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com ---
New:
Spec URL:
http://phoenix.inf.upol.cz/~grulichj/rpmbuild/SPECS/kde-plasma-akonadi-calendars.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842328
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
--- Comment #9 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com ---
New:
Spec URL:
http://phoenix.inf.upol.cz/~grulichj/rpmbuild/SPECS/kde-plasma-akonadi-calendars.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842679
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842337
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842679
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839744
--- Comment #3 from Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu ---
perl-Rose-Object (and it's requirements) are not yet in Fedora 16 and 17
because they've not yet aged long enough in testing. It's going to make the
rest of the packages a low process as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839744
Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842066
Richard Marko rma...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842679
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Bohuslav, please take ownership of review BZs, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
--- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
- Probably just a typo: Your VR is 1.0.1-1, but you obsolete django-authopenid
1.0.1-4. That should be 1.0.1-1, right?
- You should remove the egg-info directory in the %prep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842679
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842337
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842328
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832677
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839744
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842066
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822049
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823873
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Ok, better. If the Source and Patch files are generated by you, you can leave
off the URL, so it should be:
Source0: ThePowderToy-81.2.tar.xz
Source1: Powder.desktop
Source2: powder.png
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784145
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(kwiz...@gmail.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836940
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #78 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
That's also something that should have been check as part oas follow the
policy part of the review :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #79 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Michael,
We're not replacing existing packages. We're doing this people using an
unofficial unsupported Fedora repo so that they avoid conflicts with yum
update.
Yes, it's not clean, it's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|0x |Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sd...@redhat.com
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
Bug ID: 842778
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
Koji scratch build against F17:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4325855
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
rpmlint says:
avgtime.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %Y
avgtime.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %m
avgtime.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %d
avgtime.src: W: invalid-url Source0: avgtime-20120724
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836940
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
--- Comment #13 from Jeff Peeler jpee...@redhat.com ---
Removed pycrypto
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/heat-api/heat-rpms/master/heat.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jpeeler/heat-4-4.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836850
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836850
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
truezip-7.5.5-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/truezip-7.5.5-4.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
--- Comment #14 from Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com ---
Package review:
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
--- Comment #15 from Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com ---
Jeff,
There are several blocking issues:
[!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: defattr() present in %files section. This is OK if packaging
for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
--- Comment #16 from Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com ---
Regarding this rpmlint error:
[root@bigiron results]# rpmlint heat*noarch.rpm
heat.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830581
Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #80 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
The policy exist for a reason, in this case, adding version on Obsoletes permit
to avoid potential problem in the future. For example, if there need to have a
rpm named
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #81 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mate-doc-utils-1.4.0-13.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-doc-utils-1.4.0-13.fc17
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #82 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mate-doc-utils-1.4.0-13.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-doc-utils-1.4.0-13.fc16
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
--- Comment #17 from Jeff Peeler jpee...@redhat.com ---
Requested changes made.
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/heat-api/heat-rpms/master/heat.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jpeeler/heat-4-5.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #83 from raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de ---
[rave@mother Mate]$ sudo yum localinstall
mate-doc-utils-1.4.0-13.fc16.noarch.rpm
Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, changelog, downloadonly, fastestmirror,
presto, remove-with-leaves,
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
