https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838540
Danishka Navin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danis...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842679
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843470
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842101
--- Comment #1 from Danishka Navin ---
fixed mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs warning
http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-yupana/sugar-yupana.spec
http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-yupana/sugar-yupana-5-2.fc17.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839730
--- Comment #5 from Danishka Navin ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[ ]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requireme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843695
Bug ID: 843695
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840374
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen ---
Strange there is no devel entry on:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/kalapi-fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840636
--- Comment #11 from Jeff Peeler ---
Removed 3 blocking issues above.
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/heat-api/heat-rpms/master/heat_jeos.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jpeeler/heat_jeos-1-4.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841418
--- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> and I wonder which OS dependant
> files you mean, as it is just a bunch of bash scripts?
The FHS defines datadir as "read-only architecture-independent data"
Note the "data" and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843678
Danishka Navin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843678
Bug ID: 843678
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788067
Peter Hutterer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mc...@redhat.com)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825865
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Please note: fedora-review was done on an SRPM where I removed the call to make
check, since my system does not has IPv6 connectivity.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825865
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
- When in a mock build, %check needs openssl, maybe that should be a
BuildRequire?
- On a system with no IPv6 network, the tests fail:
Cannot resolve address '::1' port '10443': Name or service not known
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767649
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System ---
lcm-0.9.0-6.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lcm-0.9.0-6.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825865
--- Comment #5 from Paul Wouters ---
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/sslsplit/sslsplit.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/sslsplit/sslsplit-0.4.4-2.fc17.src.rpm
* Fri Jul 27 2012 Paul Wouters - 0.4.4-2
- Fix missing buildrequire for check-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825865
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767649
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System ---
lcm-0.9.0-6.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lcm-0.9.0-6.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767649
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825865
--- Comment #3 from Paul Wouters ---
ecc is banned from Fedora/RHEL for legal (patent) reasons.
I'll dizup macro style and remove compression. Though i think install is a
little overkill :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
mate-corba-1.4.0-8.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-corba-1.4.0-8.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
mate-corba-1.4.0-8.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-corba-1.4.0-8.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841418
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Thanks for all the comments, I am sorry if my answers were harsh and
non-welcoming.
I have looked into the locations, and after re-reading the FHS, I have placed
the scripts in libexecdir/prey, and all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840239
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840636
Steven Dake changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sd...@redhat.com
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831228
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830812
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
paulstretch-2.2.2-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #88 from Fedora Update System ---
mate-doc-utils-1.4.0-13.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842066
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831209
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839701
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-SQL-ReservedWords-0.7-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817311
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
miniupnpc-1.6-6.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820548
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839706
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Time-Clock-1.02-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837268
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
CardManager-1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839706
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829971
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840239
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836404
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837268
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |ERRATA
--- Comment #19 from Fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831975
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
guacamole-common-js-0.6.0-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839701
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830664
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |ERRATA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840636
--- Comment #10 from Steven Dake ---
Jeff,
This package has 3 blocking issues:
[!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: defattr() present in %files section. This is OK if packaging
for EPEL5. Otherwise not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809540
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817311
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831975
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840636
--- Comment #9 from Steven Dake ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823234
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
sugar-nutrition-4-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838621
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-ServiceNow-API-1.01-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803558
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823236
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
sugar-recall-2-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823234
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823847
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823889
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823236
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830812
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838621
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-ServiceNow-API-1.01-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823105
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840636
--- Comment #8 from Jeff Peeler ---
Removed heat from requires.
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/heat-api/heat-rpms/master/heat_jeos.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jpeeler/heat_jeos-1-3.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840636
--- Comment #7 from Steven Dake ---
Can you remove heat as a depends for heat_jeos. The idea behind making a
separate tool was so that heat didn't need to be installed to generate jeos
images. Also, it would make the fedora review easier, since
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842107
--- Comment #1 from Danishka Navin ---
fixed UTF-8 character encoding issue in NEWS file
http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-america/sugar-america.spec
http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-america/sugar-america-5-2.fc17.src.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818729
Brenton Leanhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blean...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840239
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Kalev Lem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840239
--- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember ---
Will do, thanks for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843646
Danishka Navin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843646
Bug ID: 843646
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840239
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #14 from Michael Scherer ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST ldconfig called in %post and %postun i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #13 from Michael Scherer ---
And there is no license installed if I install just the -doc subpackage ( ie,
there is no deps on the main rpm, nor copy of the license in it ). And that's a
blocker.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #12 from Michael Scherer ---
yeah, i just wondered.
Anyway, while doing the full review, i found out that %dir %{_datadir}/vala/ is
likely unowned in the rpm, can you fix this ( I continue the review in the
meantime, that's not a blo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823105
--- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Also, using sed to build is very dangerous, it could break things if not
> kept up-to-date with the sources.
> I would advice you to use a patch file, as this will just fail to app
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
tntnet-2.1-13.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tntnet-2.1-13.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
tntnet-2.1-13.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tntnet-2.1-13.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
Bug 821233 depends on bug 821224, which changed state.
Bug 821224 Summary: tntnet - A web application server for web applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839142
Brenton Leanhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blean...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823105
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Also, using sed to build is very dangerous, it could break things if not kept
up-to-date with the sources.
I would advice you to use a patch file, as this will just fail to apply if the
upstream sources a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823105
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
MD5-sum check
-
798797f3ee9f413183d3a227f4051070 basho-riak_control-0.1.2-0-gc7fd3a9.tar.gz
798797f3ee9f413183d3a227f4051070 riak_control-0.1.2.0.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841766
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822283
Brenton Leanhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blean...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823105
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Patrick
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #49 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833395
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841418
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
>
> > I don't see any other issues so this package is
>
> But I do. This package is _far_, _far_ from being FHS compliant. It installs
> scripts, con
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822959
Brenton Leanhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blean...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
Bug 842778 depends on bug 843133, which changed state.
Bug 843133 Summary: Simple D program cannot link in Rawhide: "undefined
reference to `curl_easy_setopt'"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843133
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
--- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Built in Rawhide, and I added the flags too.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4331688
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
maven-indexer-4.1.2-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/maven-indexer-4.1.2-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #11 from Jef Spaleta ---
- Upstream has some interesting patterns for source url directory tree across
"series" I'd rather not assume anything about versioning and build the url by
hand.
- dbus-bench is shipped in the main package l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841418
Paul Wouters changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pwout...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842459
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842459
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org
--
You are receiving th
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
