https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841022
--- Comment #3 from Tomasz Torcz zdzi...@irc.pl ---
Hi Matthieu,
You need now to request git repo -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests
Take care.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
--- Comment #4 from Jan Safranek jsafr...@redhat.com ---
I have indeed no intention to run this package on RHEL5, so I removed
python_sitelib and python_sitearch and CFLAGS as suggested.
Regarding Anaconda stability, I'm working with Anaconda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832130
Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tho...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831749
--- Comment #31 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
Hi,
I have step in :)
(In reply to comment #26)
rubygem-sshkey-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/share/gems/doc/sshkey-1.3.1/ri/SSHKey/valid_ssh_public_key%3f-c.ri %3f
Using ? in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831749
--- Comment #32 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #28)
blocking issues - please correct at your earliest opportunity:
[!]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is
installed.
the doc package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820115
--- Comment #11 from Ding-Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com ---
SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/leptonica.spec
SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/leptonica-1.69-2.fc17.src.rpm
Legal team as include Leptonica, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845197
Bug ID: 845197
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845115
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844721
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812121
Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844721
--- Comment #3 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
- There is no need for defining the %python_sitelib, if you only target F18
(which is the target for all the django to python-django renames).
- The upstream archive contains some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840253
--- Comment #12 from Lukas Zapletal l...@redhat.com ---
Sorry for the delay, I want to implement one latest feature before sending this
in the wild. I hope this week before my PTO :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845197
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832130
--- Comment #5 from Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com ---
Added one BuildRequire to be able to build against poppler-0.20 (rawhide).
Spec URL: http://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/cups-filters.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752169
--- Comment #56 from Mattia M. mattia.meneguzzo+fed...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #52)
I've been told that, when multiple subpackages share common
directories/files, it's better to define a *-common subpackage which owns
them.
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315
--- Comment #34 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
Woah.
I haven't seen an updated spec file with one of the 2 suggested license
clarifications but I'm sure you will add them in git.
(In reply to comment #26)
Technical guidelines are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844674
Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837726
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845221
Bug ID: 845221
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845221
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
Koji scratchbuild for EL5:
* http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4350138
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845221
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||814230
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||845221
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845221
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||728302
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302
--- Comment #49 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
Folks, heads up!
Sorry for being late. I didn't submit full WebRTC suite for the review yet (it
requires a lot of work, really) but I've just submitted ilbc - stripped down
from WebRTC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845197
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845197
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511
--- Comment #22 from Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com ---
hmm, shouldn't this bug move to modified now when the package is in F18?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Agda-2.3.0.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511
--- Comment #23 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no ---
No, you should close it by hand.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837726
--- Comment #7 from Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: eclipse-jbosstools
Short Description: A set of Eclipse plugins that supports JBoss and related
technology
Owners: galileo
Branches:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843404
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844043
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844674
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844748
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Yes, sorry, you need to file a ticket in rel-eng's trac to unblock openbios
since it was retired.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845136
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
master/devel is automatic. Follow:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
to keep the devel branch from being branched
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845197
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785493
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785493
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511
Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837726
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837726
--- Comment #8 from Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt ---
(In reply to comment #6)
There is only one thing you forgot, please add the Apache license to the
packages too. You can do this at the import time.
Otherwise looks good now, APPROVED.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838540
--- Comment #4 from David Cameron d.g.came...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the feedback!
In response to the first issue, the library in this package is a plugin and so
does not need to be in a devel package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845245
Bug ID: 845245
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845197
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845197
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-pry-0.9.10-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-pry-0.9.10-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837726
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844748
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785479
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||785480 (horde-log)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785480
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||785479
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844748
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Already done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845221
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843404
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785606
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844043
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785606
--- Comment #6 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Could: remove localized php.ini (no more useful)
Could: requires php(language) = 5.2.0 per new PHP Guildelines,
but this is fedora specific (for now), so php-common seems acceptable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785606
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844748
--- Comment #20 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
Something in Firefox keeps changing that fedora-cvs flag ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831749
--- Comment #33 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-sshkey/rubygem-sshkey.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-sshkey/rubygem-sshkey-1.3.1-2.fc18.src.rpm
- License is in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845221
--- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
FWIW, I had to make webrtc packages for Chromium, they should be okay for
someone to maintain in Fedora, I'm just not incredibly motivated to do it by
myself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844792
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845262
Bug ID: 845262
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845221
--- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com ---
It's Google code, I'm not sure what you were expecting. ;)
Anyways, I don't think any of the above items necessary preclude webrtc from
going into Fedora, as long as there is a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843404
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844043
--- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
I forgot to explain why this package still needs work:
The changelog entry for version 4.0-1 is incorrect. It should be either
0:4.0-1.fc18 or 0:4.0-1. Please change this and then i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845012
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843404
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845221
Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845264
Bug ID: 845264
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845221
--- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br ---
** removed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845264
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mizde...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845221
--- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
is this useable with asterisk ?
I think for some reason jcollie remove ilbc from asterisk package.
Should be compatible. This package contains a compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844674
Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845264
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839142
--- Comment #6 from Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package
You should ask for the git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844043
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/objectweb-asm4/1/objectweb-asm4.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/objectweb-asm4/1/objectweb-asm4-4.0-2.fc16.src.rpm
-Fixed incoherent version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844043
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315
--- Comment #35 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #34)
Woah.
I haven't seen an updated spec file with one of the 2 suggested license
clarifications but I'm sure you will add them in git.
Yes, my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315
pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844792
--- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
SPECS/classycle.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315
--- Comment #37 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844674
Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844792
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/classycle/1/classycle.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/classycle/1/classycle-1.4-2.fc16.src.rpm
- Remove the Maven build method
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510
--- Comment #33 from nicolas.vievi...@univ-valenciennes.fr ---
(In reply to comment #29)
Steven,
I'll sponsor you.
Thank you for the interst you show on this Review Request, and your proposal to
sponsor me.
To join the packager group you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831749
--- Comment #34 from Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com ---
Vit,
Thanks for notes about rubygem docs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831749
Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831749
--- Comment #36 from Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com ---
Troy,
Congratulations - welcome to the packager group! The next step is to create an
SCM request. See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests
Regards
-steve
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844033
Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510
--- Comment #34 from Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com ---
No problem on delays. Yes 177841 is the right bug to find atleast two bugs to
provide reviews of.
Regards
-steve
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845012
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834070
ppecka ppe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||808577
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844792
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845245
Jan Safranek jsafr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845012
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/spock/1/spock.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/spock/1/spock-0.6-0.2.groovy.1.8.fc16.src.rpm
- Removed nonexisting requires
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844792
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844043
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844164
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
new start point.
SPEC: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate-Desktop/fc17/SPECS/mate-vfs.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832130
--- Comment #6 from Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com ---
Review of cups-filters-1.0.20-2.fc17:
Legend: + means OK, - means not OK.
- MUST(1): rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces.
+ MUST: The package must be
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
