https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845107
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #7 from Ví
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839064
--- Comment #35 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> Apologies for the confusion. It was certainly my intention to bump the spec.
>
> SRPM:
> http://brenton.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/rubygem-openshift-origin-
> common/2012081
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848314
Stef Walter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Stef Walte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845934
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845934
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|robinlee.s...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821146
--- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Ah, that makes sense why to use the github and tarball as as source. Didn't
think about it.
But still, the question stays the same. From that sources, you could build gem,
which is bui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #17 from Orion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #16 from Jan Synacek ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I need this in EPEL5/6. Jan - do you want to maintain there or shall I?
Feel free to maintain it there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785371
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #66 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785371
--- Comment #65 from Alec Leamas ---
Well. Hate to be formal, but still: this is not the place to ask for help. And
reopening the bug is a certainly Bad Idea. The bug request is for a review, and
eventually to get an approval. See
http://fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847571
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830277
Pierre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|high|medium
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825494
--- Comment #6 from pcpa ---
Thanks again. I added the suggested patch to the new package.
Yesterday I thought it could have been some glitch the issue
with permissions, as rpmlint was not saying anything about it,
but I usually test builds with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841243
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822929
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847690
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755
--- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple ---
Forgot to add a link to a scratch build for this:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4394360
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755
Brian Pepple changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||GNOME Desktop 681952
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755
Brian Pepple changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID|GNOME Desktop 681962|
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755
Brian Pepple changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||GNOME Desktop 681962
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845107
--- Comment #6 from David Nalley ---
I am more confused.
You moved from heredoc to source1 - but you don't do anything with it. (e.g.
there is no 'copy'.
Then you use %ghost in files to tell RPM 'I am not installing this but you
still need to k
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844164
--- Comment #23 from Wolfgang Ulbrich ---
new koji scratch
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4394346
%changelog
* Thu Aug 16 2012 Wolfgang Ulbrich - 1.4.0-10
- add comment to files section
* Tue Aug 07 2012 Wolfgang Ulbrich
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment #15 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208
--- Comment #12 from Joseph Marrero ---
I got to install the doc packages in their respective directories with their
version and all, I made this new package:
Spec URL: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/csync/csync.spec
SRPM URL:
http://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841199
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833395
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
ginfo-0.2.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839170
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833395
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
ginfo-0.2.1-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824478
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840437
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
--- Comment #5 from Mich
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785371
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847501
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Volker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847501
--- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847501
Jørn Lomax changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Jørn Lom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845743
Mohamed El Morabity changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844013
--- Comment #10 from Michael Scherer ---
* I still think the permission on all file except logs should not be such as
apache could write them. If there is a security issue in apache ( like a php
application gone crazy and letting anyone upload in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Marrero ---
Gregor thank you for the help,
this is the new versions fixing all the above and updating to mirall-1.0.5
Spec URL: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/mirall/mirall.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jmarrero.fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848551
Kai Engert (:kaie) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848551
Bug ID: 848551
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 9
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785371
--- Comment #63 from Fedora Update System ---
speed-dreams-2.1.0-6.trunk_r4810.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/speed-dreams-2.1.0-6.trunk_r4810.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||844960
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208
--- Comment #11 from Joseph Marrero ---
Spec URL: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/csync/csync.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/csync/csync-0.50.8-3.fc17.src.rpm
Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844013
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||839395
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839395
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||844013
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844013
--- Comment #9 from Troy Dawson ---
Spec URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/openshift-origin-broker.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/openshift-origin-broker-0.6.7-7.fc19.src.rpm
- Removed "/sbin/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844013
--- Comment #8 from Troy Dawson ---
Spec URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/openshift-origin-broker.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/openshift-origin-broker-0.6.7-6.fc19.src.rpm
- Removed dependa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785371
--- Comment #62 from Fedora Update System ---
speed-dreams-2.1.0-6.trunk_r4810.fc16 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/speed-dreams-2.1.0-6.trunk_r4810.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844013
--- Comment #7 from Troy Dawson ---
Spec URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/openshift-origin-broker.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/openshift-origin-broker-0.6.7-5.fc19.src.rpm
And this time wit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847817
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847811
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822929
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
activemq-protobuf-1.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/activemq-protobuf-1.1-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822929
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
activemq-protobuf-1.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/activemq-protobuf-1.1-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822929
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821146
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
for the newer version require jruby >(?)= 1.6.7.2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847690
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
php-pear-XML-RPC-1.5.5-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-XML-RPC-1.5.5-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847690
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821146
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Hi Vit
http://rubygems.org/downloads/jruby-rack-1.1.7.gem
contains prebuild java libraries, no source code
jruby-rack 1.0.10 requires, for build, the actual jruby...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211
--- Comment #1 from Gregor Tätzner ---
lets have a look:
- owncloud-client.desktop: error: value "Utility" for string list key
"Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" does not have a semicolon (';') as
trailing character
- BuildRequires: oxygen-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847517
--- Comment #1 from Remi Collet ---
Minor changes (use php-pear(PEAR) instead of php-pear), so
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pear-Net-DNS2-1.2.2-2.remi.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847690
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842410
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ulrik.sverd...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833395
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
ginfo-0.2.1-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847406
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833395
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848087
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847690
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Remi Colle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841243
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
gstreamer1-0.11.93-1.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-base-0.11.93-1.fc18 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11899/gstreamer1-plugins-base-0.11.9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841243
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841243
--- Comment #7 from Brian Pepple ---
Package built for rawhide, and submitted to bodhi for F18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847690
Sébastien Willmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847690
--- Comment #4 from Sébastien Willmann ---
Ok, package approved
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838901
--- Comment #20 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> I have no more objections. Ralf ?
Sorry, I haven't yet had any opportunity to look into the package again
(vacation and other commitments) ;)
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847690
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet ---
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/043bb758be56c2705716643a4a40a3a2b69a7a85#php/pear
New SRPM
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pear-XML-RPC-1.5.5-2.remi.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838901
--- Comment #19 from Jiri Popelka ---
I have no more objections. Ralf ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847690
--- Comment #2 from Sébastien Willmann ---
I can build and install the package (with php-pear-1.9.4-10) and XML_RPC still
appears in pear list.
I just noticed the following points:
- The spec file in the description is different from the spec fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848466
Jiri Popelka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||twa...@redhat.com
Whiteboard|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848466
Bug ID: 848466
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825494
--- Comment #5 from Jerry James ---
Everything is fixed except the nonstandard executable permissions. Also, there
are some explicit uses of the version number. I suggest fixing both like this:
--- cliquer.spec.orig2012-08-15 09:12:35.4028
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828879
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #23 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841199
--- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Git done (by process-git-requests).
>
Thanks Jon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828879
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
system-storage-manager-0.2-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/system-storage-manager-0.2-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828879
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846562
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #16 from Mar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841243
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841243
Brian Pepple changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841243
--- Comment #5 from Brian Pepple ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Invalid fas account names.
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: gstreamer1-plugins-base
Short Description: GStreamer streaming media framework base plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841243
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Invalid fas account names.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846562
--- Comment #15 from Marcela Mašláňová ---
It would be nice if upstream have the part License in pir files like Perl 5
modules have. But the LICENSE file with Artistic 2.0 should be enough for files
in src, t, and others.
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846562
--- Comment #14 from Marcela Mašláňová ---
License:
Being in the public domain is not a license; rather, it means the material is
not copyrighted and no license is needed.
So, I would tag it as: Artistic 2.0 and ISC and WTFPL
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828879
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847436
Martin Sourada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847690
Sébastien Willmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastien.willm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848423
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||823458, 652648
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823458
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||848423
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754023
--- Comment #11 from Jerry James ---
If you think you'll have a candidate package by, say, the end of the year, then
I'm willing to keep waiting. If you think it will be 2013 or beyond, though,
we should probably close it for now.
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845221
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||848423
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848423
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||845221
Whiteboard|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848423
Bug ID: 848423
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754023
--- Comment #10 from Volker Fröhlich ---
I haven't looked into it since. We can close the ticket for now, if you like.
Sorry for the long delay.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847406
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
clean-extra-utils-0.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clean-extra-utils-0.1-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo