https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852892
Jan Vcelak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Jan Vcel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854176
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849545
--- Comment #4 from Mathieu Bridon ---
Thanks for the comments, this should address both issues.
Spec URL:
http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Algorithm-NaiveBayes.spec
SRPM URL:
http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Algorith
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854176
--- Comment #24 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Created attachment 611658
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=611658&action=edit
Fix runtime requirements for rawhide
With Patch 0001-change-setup.py-requires-to-fix.patch
#
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854176
--- Comment #23 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
With pep8 1.3 in f18
Spec URL:
http://www.saef.com.ve/fedorarpm/python-django-admin-honeypot/python-django-admin-honeypot.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.saef.com.ve/fedorarpm/python-django-admin-honeypot/pyt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854837
--- Comment #17 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/inkscape-sozi/7/inkscape-sozi-12.05-7.fc17.src.rpm
http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/inkscape-sozi/7/inkscape-sozi.spec
$ rpmlint -i inkscape-sozi-12.05-7.fc17.n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853463
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(fedora@famillecol |
|let.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854837
--- Comment #16 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Changes Ready Itamar:
http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/inkscape-sozi/inkscape-sozi-12.05-6.fc17.src.rpm
http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/inkscape-sozi/inkscape-sozi.spec
$ rpmlint -i inkscape
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849618
Mathieu Bridon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
--- Comment #30 from Jason A. Donenfeld ---
In response to some requests from some Fedora devs, version 1.2 has been
released, before QA on 1.1.4 has even completed. There are no build changes or
any other changes that will change the nature of t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856026
Matt Spaulding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||856027
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856025
Matt Spaulding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||856027
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856024
Matt Spaulding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||856027
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856027
Matt Spaulding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856027
Bug ID: 856027
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856024
Matt Spaulding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||856026
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856026
Matt Spaulding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856026
Bug ID: 856026
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856024
Matt Spaulding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856024
Matt Spaulding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||856025
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856025
Matt Spaulding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856025
Bug ID: 856025
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856024
Bug ID: 856024
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854837
--- Comment #15 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ---
Eduardo, please look at koji build logs.
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/inkscape/extensions/sozi.css
...
...
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/inkscape/extensions/sozi_upgrade.pyo
adding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855588
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> For F18 and greater, we need to add configure flags to cabal. Link to spec
> file for f18
> http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-concrete-typerep-f18.spec
Then plea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855561
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854062
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854176
--- Comment #22 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Eduardo, it looks like, it still requires pep-1.3.3 to build. I haven't
> looked into your patch, yet. I guess, that can be fixed really fast.
Matthias the package does not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853463
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835170
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851583
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
Bug ID: 856002
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855561
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854062
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855561
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
mediawiki119-RSS-2.16-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki119-RSS-2.16-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855561
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854764
--- Comment #5 from Adam Miller ---
I was referencing a --nobase install via kickstart, a previous employer of mine
did all their installations like that to keep OS installs in the virtualization
farm as minimal as possible. Don't know how realis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854764
Rob Millner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rmill...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Ro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854176
--- Comment #21 from Matthias Runge ---
Eduardo, it looks like, it still requires pep-1.3.3 to build. I haven't looked
into your patch, yet. I guess, that can be fixed really fast.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850679
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852898
--- Comment #7 from Thibault North ---
Ralf, were you about to review this package ?
If so, I'll step back from the review and the following can be considered
informal.
MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854176
--- Comment #20 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Great. I'll do a full review later today.
>
> Please note, I also lifted FE-NEEDSPONSOR.
>
> Eduardo, please feel free, to contact me as well, if there are problems,
> ques
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841753
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #29 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772989
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772988
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772986
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850646
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851583
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
gnome-abrt-0.2-9.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-abrt-0.2-9.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851583
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849618
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843775
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mza...@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from Vít
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839654
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855561
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855561
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Patr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855561
Paul Wouters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Paul W
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855561
--- Comment #5 from Paul Wouters ---
So who owns %{_datadir}/mediawiki119/extensions/RSS ?
I thought this package needed to own that?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851721
--- Comment #2 from Olivier Bilodeau ---
Updates:
- whitespace cleanup
- global instead of define
- removed useless Provides:...
- Source URL now uses real_name global
I plan to propose this to EPEL5 also.
Successful koji build:
http://koji.fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852503
--- Comment #2 from Olivier Bilodeau ---
Changes to package based on comments:
- whitespace cleanup
- global instead of define
- removed duplicated Provides:...
- Source URL now uses real_name global
Notes:
I do plan to propose this in EPEL5 s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854609
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854608
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855829
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553
--- Comment #7 from MartinKG ---
Spec URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/guayadeque/guayadeque-0.3.6-5.svn1830/guayadeque.spec?a=416FXyjkgDc
SRPM URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/guayadeque/guayadeque-0.3.6-5.sv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772989
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.fc17,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.fc17,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.fc17
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772988
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.fc17,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.fc17,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.fc17
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772986
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.fc17,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.fc17,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.fc17
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772989
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.el5,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.el5,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.el5
has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772988
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.el5,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.el5,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.el5
has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772986
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.el5,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.el5,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.el5
has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772989
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.fc16,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.fc16,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.fc16
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772988
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.fc16,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.fc16,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.fc16
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772986
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.fc16,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.fc16,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.fc16
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772989
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.el6,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.el6,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.el6
has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772988
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.el6,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.el6,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.el6
has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772986
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.el6,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.el6,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.el6
has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772989
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.fc18,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.fc18,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.fc18
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772988
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.fc18,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.fc18,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.fc18
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855561
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
I have removed the EL5 parts and added the license.
The %dir is only required for root directories which the package should own,
but should not own all the files inside.
For example %{_libdir}/clean for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772986
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-gram-job-manager-sge-1.5-1.fc18,globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-1.5-1.fc18,globus-gram-job-manager-fork-1.5-1.fc18
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772989
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772988
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772986
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855829
Nikola Dipanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855829
--- Comment #5 from Nikola Dipanov ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-autopep8
Short Description: formats Python code based on the output of pep8
Owners: ndipanov mrunge
Branches: f18
InitialCC:
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855829
--- Comment #4 from Nikola Dipanov ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-autopep8
Short Description: python-autopep8 - formats Python code based on the output of
pep8
Owners: ndipanov mrunge
Branches: f18
Initia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855829
--- Comment #3 from Nikola Dipanov ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-autopep8
Short Description: autopep8 formats Python code based on the output of the pep8
utility.
Owners: ndipanov mrunge
Branches: f18
In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855843
Bug ID: 855843
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855829
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855829
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855829
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855829
Bug ID: 855829
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772989
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772988
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772986
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
f19==devel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849618
--- Comment #3 from Mathieu Bridon ---
Thanks for the comments, they should all be fixed with this new package.
Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-AI-DecisionTree.spec
SRPM URL:
http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Bug ID: 855780
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
pass-1.1.4-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pass-1.1.4-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772989
Mattias Ellert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Mattias
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772986
Mattias Ellert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Mattias
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo