https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
--- Comment #1 from Ivan Romanov ---
$ rpmlint gsm-ussd-0.4.0-0.1.25.fc17.noarch.rpm
gsm-ussd-0.4.0-0.1.25.fc17.src.rpm
gsm-ussd.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/libexec/gsm-ussd/lib/GSMUSSD/DCS.pm
gsm-ussd.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
Bug ID: 859586
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858081
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824703
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838568
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855701
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833623
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830784
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(m...@zarb.org)
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
Andy Grimm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827810
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(maths...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858106
--- Comment #3 from Rich Mattes ---
I've made the two updates to the package, you can find it at:
Spec URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/rospackages/rospkg/python-rospkg.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/rospackages/rospkg/python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835015
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853689
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848142
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Drake ---
rpmlint:
maliit-plugins.i686: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/maliit/plugins/org/nemomobile/KeyboardUiConstants.js
maliit-plugins.i686: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/maliit/plugins/org/nemomobile/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852330
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate/4.1.7.Final/hibernate.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate/4.1.7.Final/hibernate-4.1.7-1.fc16.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852330
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate/4.1.7.Final
/hibernate.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate/4.1.7.Final
/hibernate-4.1.7-1.fc16.src.rpm
- update to 4.1.7.Final
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848142
Daniel Drake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@laptop.org
Assignee|nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744066
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
--- Comment #44 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/gradle/release/1.0-7/gradle.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/gradle/release/1.0-7/gradle-1.0-7.fc16.src.rpm
- Revert symlinks in %%_javadir, exception f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848139
Daniel Drake changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845763
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842410
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Yes, the nautilus plugin is removed in upstream git.
Thanks for that info. I will provide new spec and srpm soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851891
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
--- Comment #43 from Andy Grimm ---
It looks like /usr/share/gradle/lib/gradle-launcher-1.0.jar is special and
cannot be moved, because the launcher inspects its own _dereferenced_ file path
to determine where to find other jars. The others can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857524
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825599
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
samdump2-3.0.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853686
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-bear-0.1.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
--- Comment #42 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/gradle/release/1.0-6/gradle.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/gradle/release/1.0-6/gradle-1.0-6.fc16.src.rpm
- Revert symlinks from %%_datadir/gradle to %%_java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848139
Daniel Drake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@laptop.org
Assignee|nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848144
--- Comment #5 from MERCIER Jonathan ---
$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/SDL2-2.0.0-3.fc17.src.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/SDL2-2.0.0-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/SDL2-devel-2.0.0-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm
/home/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847268
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
--- Comment #41 from gil cattaneo ---
hi
gradle dont work with symlinks in %%_datadir/gradle
+ mkdir -p gradlehome
+ gradle --debug -g /home/gil/rpmbuild/BUILD/groovy-2.0.2/gradlehome -b
/home/gil/rpmbuild/BUILD/groovy-2.0.2/buildSrc/build.grad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
--- Comment #40 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/gradle/release/1.0-5/gradle.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/gradle/release/1.0-5/gradle-1.0-5.fc16.src.rpm
- Removed bundled jars
- Fixed unowned directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794
--- Comment #4 from MERCIER Jonathan ---
SPEC: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/gl3n.spec
SRPM: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/gl3n-0.20120813-3.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794
--- Comment #3 from MERCIER Jonathan ---
I do not know the reason exactly but stripping process do not works with D
shared library.
For this reason is used: %global debug_package %{nil}
That is same for haskell by example
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813842
--- Comment #20 from MERCIER Jonathan ---
Spec: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/glfw.spec
SRPMS : http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/glfw-3.0-6.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807810
Jon Stanley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018
--- Comment #36 from Matthias Runge ---
OK; latest version is 0.8.9
For reference, here's my
SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/nodejs.spec
SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/nodejs-0.8.9-1.fc17.src.rpm
Currently, there are a few
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807810
--- Comment #12 from Josh Boyer ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
>
> > I have no interest in doing anything with EPEL5 at all. Ever. If someone
> > wishes to co-maintain this package on that branch then they can fix th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794
--- Comment #2 from Paul Wouters ---
/usr/lib64/libgl3n-ldc.so.1.0.0: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version
1 (SYSV), dynamically linked,
BuildID[sha1]=0x0340c3c46d36d359c53b19d2d0caf9f03ebfa885, not stripped
this also needs fixing, some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807810
--- Comment #11 from Jon Stanley ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I have no interest in doing anything with EPEL5 at all. Ever. If someone
> wishes to co-maintain this package on that branch then they can fix that up
> on the branch.
Then the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807810
--- Comment #10 from Josh Boyer ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Issues:
> [!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
> Note: defattr() present in %files section. This is OK if packaging
> for EPEL5. Otherwise not ne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859504
Bug ID: 859504
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807810
--- Comment #9 from Jon Stanley ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794
--- Comment #1 from Paul Wouters ---
Note: comments ver ysimilar to glfw.
The version seems better to be 0, as upstream has no versioning whatsoever. It
uses a soname of 1, but we don't know if that signifies a pre or post release
of version 1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856722
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
openstack-cinder-2012.2-0.5.rc1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openstack-cinder-2012.2-0.5.rc1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847268
--- Comment #10 from François Cami ---
My fault, thanks for the catch.
new srpm: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/girara-0.1.3-6.fc16.src.rpm
new spec: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/girara.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847268
--- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I removed el5 compatibility ...
In this case, the following parts of your latest spec are obsolete:
- the BuildRoot tag
- the initial cleaning of %buildroot in %install
- the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813842
--- Comment #19 from Paul Wouters ---
I missed it also needs a Require: (not just Buildrequire) geany because it is
installing files in /usr/share/geany
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847268
--- Comment #8 from François Cami ---
Thank you Mario.
I removed el5 compatibility and added the Requires: line for the -devel
package.
new srpm: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/girara-0.1.3-5.fc16.src.rpm
new spec: http://fcami.fedorapeopl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859469
Wolfgang Ulbrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chat-to...@raveit.de
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859068
Adam Tkac changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813842
Paul Wouters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859469
Bug ID: 859469
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
--- Comment #39 from Andy Grimm ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
gradle.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807810
--- Comment #8 from Josh Boyer ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> For example from one of my packages:
>
> # Upstream does not provide tarballs.
> # To generate:
> # git clone
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/trace-cmd.git
> #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859193
Miroslav Lichvar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833623
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858239
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833623
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844150
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||853692
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853692
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||844150 (mate-desktop)
--- Comment #7 from R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859032
Lakshmi Narasimhan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858060
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
WARNING: "eallen" is not in the packager group.
WARNING: "mpierce" is not a valid FAS account.
WARNING: Couldn't parse package name out of bug summary.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858060
--- Comment #6 from Ernie ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: qpid-snmpd
Short Description: SNMP agent for Amqp qpid broker
Owners: eallen mpierce
Branches: f16 f17 f18 el6
InitialCC: eallen
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856722
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
That can't be done AFAIK, just follow the retirement procedure for it. It
shouldn't harm anything.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858060
Darryl L. Pierce changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859068
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856153
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856099
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795679
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824703
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
gnome-shell-theme-selene-3.4.0-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-theme-selene-3.4.0-5.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859068
Adam Tkac changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Adam Tkac -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824703
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
gnome-shell-theme-selene-3.4.0-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-theme-selene-3.4.0-5.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824703
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018
--- Comment #35 from Adrian Alves ---
Working on that new release
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795679
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856153
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856099
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859193
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856111
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Added f18.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856111
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859193
Miroslav Lichvar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Miros
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856722
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859193
Tomas Hozza changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856722
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pbr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #9 from Pá
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859068
Tomas Hozza changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859193
--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Lichvar ---
Thanks for the review!
Updated srpm:
http://mlichvar.fedorapeople.org/tmp/linuxptp-0-0.2.20120920git6ce135.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832953
--- Comment #7 from Pavel Raiskup ---
* file /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/autoload/syntastic/c.vim should go to
syntastic-c subpackage probably
* some minor trailing white characters are still present
Otherwise it seems ok to me, thanks for your w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859068
--- Comment #3 from Adam Tkac ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> As for:
> [ ]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
> "Apache (v2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858239
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855701
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849579
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Unsetting flag.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824703
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859193
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Hozza ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858239
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858239
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824703
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859193
Tomas Hozza changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tho...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859068
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Hozza ---
As for:
[ ]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Apache (v2.0)", "GPL (v2 or later)".
The
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
