https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675
Erwin Waterlander changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675
Bug ID: 859675
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856161
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856513
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852892
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852893
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756776
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837816
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754437
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855656
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856099
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856153
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859671
--- Comment #1 from Eric Christensen ---
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/opencpn-*
SPECS/opencpn.spec
opencpn.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary opencpn
opencpn-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859671
Bug ID: 859671
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851583
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #17 from Michael Scherer ---
Hi jef, since you seems to be back from your cold cold hideout, can you make
the request for inclusion ( I approved the package, but since you left for a
mission, I guess you may have forgot about this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806117
--- Comment #6 from Abdel Gadiel Martínez Lassonde
---
It is updated. Please check :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833623
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783073
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854345
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833623
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-nettle-2.4-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-nettle-2.4-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833623
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-nettle-2.4-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-nettle-2.4-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833623
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815982
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856554
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822718
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827814
--- Comment #12 from Siddharth Sharma ---
thanks :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856554
--- Comment #6 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-pottymouth
Short Description: Transform unstructured, untrusted text to safe, valid XHTML
Owners: echevemaster
Branches: f16 f17 f18
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806117
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856554
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
--- Comment #11 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> xussd uses zenity or kdialog. Is it imposible to have some 'or' operator in
> Requires?
As far as I know, there's no convenient way to choose the one or the other. It
also dep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856554
--- Comment #4 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Hi Mario, thanks for your comments, the corrected specs and SRPMS here:
Spec URL:
http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/python-pottymouth/3/python-pottymouth.spec
SRPM URL:
http://echevemaster.fedorapeop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852214
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
--- Comment #10 from Ivan Romanov ---
I wonder maybe should drop xussd from the package. And next work with upstream
to make a front-end only for a single dialog?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
--- Comment #9 from Ivan Romanov ---
xussd uses zenity or kdialog. Is it imposible to have some 'or' operator in
Requires?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851891
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Dyroff ---
Thanks, for the comments.
I've updated the spec, see:
http://git.dyroff.org/?p=sdyroff-rpms.git;a=blob_plain;f=SPECS/wiki2beamer.spec;hb=4921d5aee3fca96a94caa6fbcc902b3d6f8073c8
srpm: http://www.dyroff.o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834681
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
--- Comment #49 from gil cattaneo ---
I also asked to become co maintainer but I had no answer. until now
any ideas on how should I proceed?
thanks
regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
--- Comment #48 from gil cattaneo ---
hi Jon,
i know but can you see this
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2012-September/004521.html
the packagers haven't time to spend follow this new gradle release...
i opened this other bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848142
Daniel Drake changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847268
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Whiteboard|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
--- Comment #47 from Jon Ciesla ---
Already exists.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854596
--- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer ---
Steve, you have forgot to ask for the repository :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
--- Comment #8 from Mich
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844775
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847389
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
--- Comment #7 from Ivan Romanov ---
fixed
SRPM:
https://github.com/drizt/gsm-ussd-package/b6d2fbebc452ae4c912ff3e1015b858e3e22ab38/master/gsm-ussd-0.4.0-0.2.25.fc17.src.rpm
SPEC:
https://raw.github.com/drizt/gsm-ussd-package/b6d2fbebc452ae4c91
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847268
François Cami changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852254
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856554
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833623
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827814
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858025
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
--- Comment #5 from Ivan Romanov ---
hm ... it's weird for me.
gsm-ussd.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/libexec/gsm-ussd/lib/GSMUSSD/Lockfile.pm
I've looked at this file and it has bashing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
--- Comment #4 from Ivan Romanov ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> - use %global instead of %define
Why?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853252
--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Issues:
>
> 1. The license is only visible because of the LICENSE/gpl-3.0.txt files, no
> headers are visible in the files indicating their license.
>
There are a lot of pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
--- Comment #3 from MartinKG ---
four comments:
- PatchY should prefixed with %{name}
- use %global instead of %define
- %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: defattr() present in %files section. This is OK if packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgans...@alice.de
--- Comment #2 from MartinK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847268
François Cami changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785462
Guillermo Gómez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bazanlui...@gmail.com |guillermo.go...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857992
Felix Kaechele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fe...@fetzig.org
--- Comment #4 from Fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827814
Siddharth Sharma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Sidd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853252
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistent macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPLv3+)
NOT OK - Licens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
--- Comment #46 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: gradle
New Branches: f17 f18
Owners: gil
InitialCC: java-sig
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858998
Ivan Romanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dr...@land.ru
--- Comment #1 from Ivan Ro
69 matches
Mail list logo