https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858380
--- Comment #10 from Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com ---
Hi Gil,
Spec URL: http://davidcl.fedorapeople.org/gluegen2.spec
SRPM URL: http://davidcl.fedorapeople.org/gluegen2-2.0-0.4.rc10.fc17.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: davidcl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847513
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838901
Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860518
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Thanks for the heads no on libnm-gtk-devel. Is there an alias for this in 17?
That would probably be a reasonable request.
You could try to work around it with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860146
--- Comment #12 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com ---
You also need to set fedora-cvs flag to '?' or noone will know you requested
the SCM :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845689
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|python-django-setuptest |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747031
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||861782
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861893
Bug ID: 861893
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826520
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826520
--- Comment #15 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
And you should also follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Ruby_ABI
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830587
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861783
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lemen...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820659
José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838901
--- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847513
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854691
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854691
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861922
Bug ID: 861922
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861923
Bug ID: 861923
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861923
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861922
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||861923
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861922
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||bibutils
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747031
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861923
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@d5k.net
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854691
--- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Are you sure no libraries or fonts are bundled?
Which libraries?
I can see DejaVuSans.ttf bundled, thanks for the catch, will de-bundle ASAP -
we started
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854691
--- Comment #12 from Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com ---
I can't see any libraries bundled, but I must have missed the fonts..
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853124
Andrew Elwell andrew.elw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800284
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Spec file changes:
--- AtomicParsley.spec.old 2012-05-09 07:36:25.372000202 +
+++ AtomicParsley.spec 2012-09-26 18:50:26.0 +
@@ -1,31 +1,37 @@
-Summary: Command-Line
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861783
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Hi Peter,
for now I am not interested to enable them.
(for go library is'nt available go from http://golang.org/,and gomake from
http://code.google.com/p/gomake/)
python and perl bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853124
Andrew Elwell andrew.elw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826520
--- Comment #16 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch ---
Hi Vit,
I do not want to rename this package from hiera, its an application
where you can import that application into some other application.
If this was renamed then so should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847817
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847817
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826520
--- Comment #17 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Hi Vit,
I do not want to rename this package from hiera, its an application
where you can import that application into some other application.
If this was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858380
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858025
Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859149
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Indeed. Bug in my script for publishing review. Try this:
Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Encode/perl-Encode.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858025
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859671
Jean-Eudes ONFRAY j...@onfray.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@onfray.fr
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858025
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858025
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-helpdesk-0.1.7b-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-helpdesk-0.1.7b-3.el6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847811
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859099
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826520
--- Comment #18 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Well, I agree that the application vs library might be a bit fuzzy. But if
you take a look on Puppet, non of its files are installed into Ruby's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859099
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847811
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847817
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tm...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852914
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pass-1.4.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pass-1.4.1-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820659
--- Comment #2 from José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt ---
Created attachment 619821
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=619821action=edit
Patch to spec file with changes to comply with guidelines
Proposed changes to the spec file.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820659
--- Comment #3 from José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt ---
Created attachment 619823
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=619823action=edit
Patch cmake file to install the pkg-config file in %{_libdir}
With this patch the pkg-config file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854691
--- Comment #13 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
*** Bug 648973 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861783
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
added C (GLib) Library support
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854691
--- Comment #14 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
It's probably issue in the prerequisite review of python-dslib. I will follow
there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854690
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854690
--- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Original review bug #648898 python-dslib has been stuck because of bundling
suds and pyasn1. You can find more details there. Please check the libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820659
José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826520
--- Comment #19 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #17)
Well, I agree that the application vs library might be a bit fuzzy. But if
you take a look on Puppet, non of its files are installed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859099
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635
Truong Anh Tuan tua...@iwayvietnam.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768894
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841483
Aleksandra Bookwar al...@bookwar.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858025
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-helpdesk-0.1.7b-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-helpdesk-0.1.7b-3.fc17
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pencil-2.0.1-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pencil-2.0.1-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pencil-2.0.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pencil-2.0.1-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pencil-2.0.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pencil-2.0.1-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635
Truong Anh Tuan tua...@iwayvietnam.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847811
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
I think the license tag is wrong
In comment 4 I explicitly acknowledge that License: LGPLv2+ was correct. No
idea why it has been changed in the newer spec file.
The %changelog
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847513
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847513
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
librasterlite-1.1c-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/librasterlite-1.1c-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
And the %description of the utils subpackage contains error
'its' is mistaken for 'it is'.
See comment 4. it is or it's would not form a valid sentence, because an
article such as a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861893
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-puppet-lint-0.2.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845934
--- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wt-3.2.2-6.p1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858025
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858025
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-helpdesk-0.1.7b-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861694
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675
--- Comment #14 from Erwin Waterlander water...@xs4all.nl ---
Hi Matthias,
Thank you very much!
best regards,
Erwin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807383
Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847513
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
librasterlite-1.1c-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847513
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381
--- Comment #3 from Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://davidcl.fedorapeople.org/jogl2.spec
SRPM URL: http://davidcl.fedorapeople.org/jogl2-2.0-0.2.rc10.fc17.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: davidcl
Hi, I updated to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800284
--- Comment #6 from Avi Alkalay avibra...@gmail.com ---
Here are the updates based on last comments:
http://avi.alkalay.net/software/atomicparsley/AtomicParsley.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
hi Clément,
can use this pom instead ?
in jogl-v2.0-rc10/make/pom.xml
but in this one you should fix - change
versionthis pom is a stub, just to resolve dependencies/version
with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859731
--- Comment #4 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL:
http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/owncloud-deps/php-channel-sabredav/php-channel-sabredav.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857801
bph...@jhu.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819687
--- Comment #20 from Tomas Dabašinskas tdaba...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~tdabasin/python-rtkit/python-rtkit.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~tdabasin/python-rtkit/python-rtkit-0.2.5-1.el6.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861694
--- Comment #3 from Matt Spaulding mspauldin...@gmail.com ---
Updated to fix the above mentioned issues.
Spec: http://madsa.fedorapeople.org/thinkfan.spec
SRPM: http://madsa.fedorapeople.org/thinkfan-0.8.1-2.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861922
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Fixed missing BR for tcsh:
Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/bibutils/bibutils.spec
SRPM:
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/bibutils/bibutils-4.15-2.fc17.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861922
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861922
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com ---
Hello,
[+] OK
[-] NA
[?] Issue
[+] Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
[+] Spec file matches base package name.
[+] Spec has consistant macro usage.
[+] Meets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859731
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
99 matches
Mail list logo
