https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862160
Bug ID: 862160
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861893
--- Comment #2 from Milan Bartos mbar...@redhat.com ---
New spec file and src.rpm are at
http://mbartos.fedorapeople.org/libmongo_client-0.1.5-2/
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/libmongo-client-*0.1.5-2*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840171
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
What's the status here? That package hasn't been submitted to stable, please do
so!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860146
Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826520
--- Comment #20 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch ---
So what would ever be a pure application? Under what circumstances
would there ever be files in '/usr/share/ruby/vendor_ruby' ?
Steve.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860146
Vinzenz Feenstra vfeen...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862216
Bug ID: 862216
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862216
--- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4549916
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857801
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Have you spoken to the other tigervnc branch owners about this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861922
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Hi Ankur, thanks for reviewing the package.
(In reply to comment #3)
[?] License field in spec matches
^^
The copying file is GPLv2, and I see no mention of the GPL+ license anywhere
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860146
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381
--- Comment #5 from Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://davidcl.fedorapeople.org/jogl2.spec
SRPM URL: http://davidcl.fedorapeople.org/jogl2-2.0-0.3.rc10.fc17.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: davidcl
Updated, the pom is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381
Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||JOGL2
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
--- Comment #5 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de ---
Spec URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/owncloud.spec
SRPM URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/owncloud-4.0.7-4.fc17.src.rpm
small update
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859731
--- Comment #6 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de ---
Please request the branch 'el6', too. If you don't cant/want support epel, I
will offer you my co-maintainership there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811661
Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||858381 (JOGL2)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381
Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||811661
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799702
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862255
Bug ID: 862255
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862255
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||861859
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859713
--- Comment #2 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de ---
Do I have to add this dep regardless of the fact that php-mbstring already
requires php-common?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860697
--- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de ---
OK, thanks for the hint. I've added the explicit version number of the latest
manaworld package available in the Fedora repos in order to make rpmlint happy.
Unfortunately, there
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836840
--- Comment #7 from bebo_sudo bebo.s...@gmail.com ---
Ok, I followed your tip and I made some changes. Now the rpm didn't need
anymore so much dependencies. I transferred all on sourceforge, you can find
all here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862255
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860703
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: tmw-music - |Rename
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862255
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859731
Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859731
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800284
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862293
Bug ID: 862293
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862293
Praveen K Paladugu praveen_palad...@dell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862293
Praveen K Paladugu praveen_palad...@dell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852898
Thibault North thibault.no...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852898
Thibault North thibault.no...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860352
Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840171
Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852898
--- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #8)
It looks like we can go forwards and finalize this review.
According to the previous review, the package is good and therefore APPROVED.
Would you please be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800284
--- Comment #8 from Avi Alkalay avibra...@gmail.com ---
Fixed all, I think.
http://avi.alkalay.net/software/atomicparsley/AtomicParsley.spec
http://avi.alkalay.net/software/atomicparsley/AtomicParsley-0.9.0-12.fc17.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862255
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862255
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856554
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-pottymouth-2.2.1-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856554
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-pottymouth-2.2.1-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861893
--- Comment #3 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
Hi Milan
- Spec files placed in sight, fedora-review seek the rpm release number for to
check always the last
- You have a warning :
libmongo-client-devel.x86_64: W:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862255
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852898
--- Comment #10 from Thibault North thibault.no...@gmail.com ---
Would you please be so kind and not rush it overly hasty. Sending a private
mail
off-list asking me to look back into this package and then to approve the
package 1/2 hour later
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859713
--- Comment #3 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
[!]: MUST Package requires php-common instead of php.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP
Requires: php-common = $VERSION.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859713
--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
@eduardo Package requires php-common instead of php this means that the
package must not requires php
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP
PHP library must not have an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750902
--- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Are there other issues left?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860352
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header files in -devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860352
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com ---
Created attachment 620411
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=620411action=edit
Licensecheck output
So basically I see three issues here:
1. There are unversioned .so files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861694
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750902
--- Comment #10 from Jaromír Cápík jca...@redhat.com ---
If not, then please, upload the final version of spec and srpm ...
Thanks,
Jaromir.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862368
Bug ID: 862368
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859713
--- Comment #5 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de ---
that's a nice one. But I think my next question is obvious: How can I create a
connection between the output of phpci and the package management system? I
have no idea in which packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858060
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859713
--- Comment #6 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
that's a nice one. But I think my next question is obvious: How can I create
a connection between the output of phpci and the package management system?
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860697
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858380
Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858380
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859713
--- Comment #7 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de ---
Spec URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-cloudfiles.spec
SRPM URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-cloudfiles-1.7.11-2.fc17.src.rpm
understood, thanks
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
Guillermo Gómez guillermo.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
--- Comment #4 from Guillermo Gómez guillermo.go...@gmail.com ---
First comment for readers, i had a long talk with Eduardo in order to review
the naming convention for this pkg since it fits the case of a post-release.
Eduardo has to workaround
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858060
--- Comment #10 from Ernie eal...@redhat.com ---
SPEC URL: http://eallen.fedorapeople.org/qpid-snmpd.spec
SRPM URL: http://eallen.fedorapeople.org/qpid-snmpd-1.0.0-5.fc17.src.rpm
1) ... use the newer macroized scriptlets for Fedora 18+...
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748450
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Just a reminder ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860146
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vsqlite++-0.3.9-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vsqlite++-0.3.9-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860146
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860146
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vsqlite++-0.3.9-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vsqlite++-0.3.9-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823682
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Just a reminder ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839650
Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmo...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839652
Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmo...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827101
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839649
Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmo...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249
--- Comment #21 from Tobias Florek m...@ibotty.net ---
new release:
SPEC http://www.math.hu-berlin.de/~florek/adobe-source-code-pro-fonts.spec
SRPM
http://www.math.hu-berlin.de/~florek/adobe-source-code-pro-fonts-1.010-1.fc17.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841483
--- Comment #16 from Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com ---
New successfull build:
Spec:
https://raw.github.com/F1ash/plasmaMailChecker/10b7be10db07900861717727cd3a3459bef0caed/kde-plasma-mail-checker.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846488
--- Comment #4 from Yannick Brosseau yannick.bross...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Shared lib calls exit. This should be reported upstream.
See bug: http://bugs.lttng.org/issues/322
Can you run the tests?
Right now, the make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846488
--- Comment #5 from Yannick Brosseau yannick.bross...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I'm not sure about the license. I wonder why include/babeltrace/list.h
claims LGPLv2. That one test is GPLv2, which I find a little strange. Should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Sorry for not responding sooner; I must have skipped right over your previous
two messages.
If there's any chance that gperf is needed, you should definitely add a build
dependency on it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846488
--- Comment #6 from Yannick Brosseau yannick.bross...@gmail.com ---
Updated package available at:
SPEC: http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/SPECS/babeltrace.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853694
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853694
--- Comment #10 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
you also have a spelling mistake in
%configure --disable-static --disable-schemas-instalp --disable-scrollkeeper
--libexecdir=/usr/libexec
--disable-schemas-instalp
should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861694
Matt Spaulding mspauldin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830113
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rootfs-resize-0.9-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rootfs-resize-0.9-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830113
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rootfs-resize-0.9-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rootfs-resize-0.9-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861694
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860515
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861922
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
However grepping more carefully now I see there is a manpage src file
in docbook (.dbk) which states the manpage is GPLv2+.
I am not sure if that is sufficient to make the whole package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860521
--- Comment #4 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Per our conversation, fixed some of the scriptlets, and the licensing. There is
a bug in mate-conf-1.4.0-19 works fine with mate-conf-1.4.0-14, we know what to
fix with that one.
This one
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860515
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859819
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860146
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860146
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vsqlite++-0.3.9-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850641
Bug 850641 depends on bug 849545, which changed state.
Bug 849545 Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-NaiveBayes - Bayesian
prediction of categories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849545
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849545
Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862501
Bug ID: 862501
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853694
--- Comment #11 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Leigh,
Yes, learned the hard way about looking at build logs.
The reason why libexec is there is to avoid the conflict with gnome... what
would you suggest? It does work, yes I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862502
Bug ID: 862502
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862502
Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||862501
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862501
Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||862502
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859731
Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||862502
--
You are
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
