https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865997
Brendan Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||805236 (FedoraAudio)
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865997
Bug ID: 865997
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865915
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865915
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865915
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov ---
> psavelye
I wonder why Red Hat still restricts user names to 8 symbols? What year is in
Brno now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810676
--- Comment #30 from Björn Persson ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> > · The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
> > → ISSUES: Trying to compile the demos reveals several problems:
> > · aws.gpr tries to import "aws/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865915
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865995
Brendan Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||805236 (FedoraAudio)
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865995
Bug ID: 865995
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810676
Pavel Zhukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(pa...@zhukoff.net |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865937
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michel+...@sylvestre.me
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864187
Ryan K changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
--- Comment #3 from Ryan K ---
I see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865979
Alex G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||865977, 865976
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865977
Alex G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||865979
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865976
Alex G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||865979
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865979
Alex G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865979
Bug ID: 865979
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865977
Alex G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865977
Bug ID: 865977
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865976
Alex G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865976
Bug ID: 865976
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849026
--- Comment #15 from Ian Malone ---
Python dependencies: I ran into some issues over this. The rpm was being built
with these dependencies:
rpm -qRp ~/build/RPMS/jam-control-1.01-2.fc18.noarch.rpm
/bin/python
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
PyQt4
hicolo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865970
Bug ID: 865970
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842410
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812559
--- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich ---
* Fri Oct 12 2012 Volker Fröhlich - 0.7.0-2
- BR python-setuptools instead of ...-devel
- Delete pre-built egg info
Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/python-Rtree.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.geofro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865937
Bug ID: 865937
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865538
--- Comment #2 from Ralph Bean ---
Removed unnecessary CFLAGS definition:
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/datanommer-commands.spec
SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/datanommer-commands-0.2.0-3.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536
--- Comment #2 from Ralph Bean ---
Removed unnecessary CFLAGS definition.
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-datanommer-consumer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://threebean.org/rpm/python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-3.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535
--- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Still two objections:
>
> The CFLAGS definition is useless here, we don't have any C code.
>
> This package is a split-out from datanommer. It's only defined that it
> conflicts wit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842410
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: kupfer - An |Review Request: kupfer -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842410
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797203
--- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > Based on the f18 build:
> >
> > $ rpmlint -i -v *
> > augeas-vala.src: I: checking
> > augeas-vala.src: I: checking-url
> > http://www.gitorious.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865915
Saveliev Peter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865915
Bug ID: 865915
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797203
--- Comment #8 from Fabian Deutsch ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Based on the f18 build:
>
> $ rpmlint -i -v *
> augeas-vala.src: I: checking
> augeas-vala.src: I: checking-url
> http://www.gitorious.org/valastuff/augeas-vala/ (timeout 10 secon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797203
--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann ---
Based on the f18 build:
$ rpmlint -i -v *
augeas-vala.src: I: checking
augeas-vala.src: I: checking-url
http://www.gitorious.org/valastuff/augeas-vala/ (timeout 10 seconds)
augeas-vala.src: W: invalid-ur
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865893
Bug ID: 865893
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865890
Bug ID: 865890
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823122
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/zookeeper/2/zookeeper.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/zookeeper/2/zookeeper-3.4.4-2.fc16.src.rpm
- add ant-junit as BR
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842410
--- Comment #13 from Mario Blättermann ---
Thanks for your hints. However, this was not my package initially, that's why
there were some artifacts from other packagers. Now all the issues seem to be
solved.
New files:
Spec URL: http://mariobl.fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823122
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
no i built only in my f16 system
this problem should fixed adding ant-junit as BR
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859819
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
almas-mongolian-title-fonts-1.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859819
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
jogl2-2.0-0.4.rc10.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864090
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
gnome-shell-extension-fedmsg-0.1.0-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18
testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864090
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823122
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey C. Ollie ---
Have you tested this on F17? On F17 I need to add 'hostname' to the list of
BuildRequires. Once I've done that I get the following during the %check:
/builddir/build/BUILD/zookeeper-3.4.4/build.xml:1133
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812559
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann ---
Now it builds for Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4585762
$ rpmlint -i -v *
python-Rtree.src: I: checking
python-Rtree.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) spatialindex -> sp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864535
--- Comment #8 from Michal Privoznik ---
Okay, another try:
SPEC:
http://fedorapeople.org/~mprivozn/libvirt-designer/3/libvirt-designer.spec
SRPM:
http://fedorapeople.org/~mprivozn/libvirt-designer/3/libvirt-designer-0.0.1-3.fc19.src.rpm
BaseUR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822952
Jeffrey C. Ollie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822952
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
yes thanks
sorry for the inconvenience
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823122
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|822952 |
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Sp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822952
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|823122 |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822952
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey C. Ollie ---
If I'm understanding you correctly, rat-lib will not be needed to build your
zookeeper 3.4.4 package and therefore this review can be abandoned?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822952
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i |
|t)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865630
Saveliev Peter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||python-pyvfs
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797203
--- Comment #6 from Fabian Deutsch ---
http://fedorapeople.org/~fabiand/augeas-vala/0.10.0-3/
Some more changes were needed, autoconf, automake, and augeas as a build req
(for tests)
But now builds fine on
F18 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822952
Jeffrey C. Ollie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865615
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797203
--- Comment #5 from Fabian Deutsch ---
Hey,
thanks. I'm now also doing somoe F18/19/rawhide builds to prevent such
problems.
It seems as if automake is also missing. Will update teh spec shortly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864937
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
--- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert ---
I'll review this this weekend during FUDCon. If somebody else is quicker, go
ahead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823122
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
hi Jeffrey,
sure, now work on this, but if want take the ownership no problems
thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865615
Federico Simoncelli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823122
Jeffrey C. Ollie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@ocjtech.us
--- Comment #1 from J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864481
--- Comment #3 from Massimo Paladin ---
Hi Matthias,
the package looks fine to me:
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: Package does
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864481
Massimo Paladin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Mas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865615
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(p...@draigbrady.com) |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #38 from Russell Golden ---
(In reply to comment #35)
>I'm searching for upstream information, but it seems Thunderbird 17
> will switch to Gecko ESR tree. As I don't know what is the plan for
> Seamonkey, I think this change will mak
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865615
Federico Simoncelli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(p...@draigbrady.com)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854558
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865615
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|needinfo?(p.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865802
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://xpisar.wz.cz/ctstrea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865802
Bug ID: 865802
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865615
Federico Simoncelli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(p...@draigbrady.com)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854558
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Peter L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861610
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865615
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@draigbrady.com
Assignee|n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859110
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859112
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859111
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865787
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865787
Bug ID: 865787
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864937
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura ---
Changelog:
- remove defattr and rm -rf buildroot
Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/zeromq3.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/zeromq3-3.2.0-0.3.20121009git1ef63bc.fc16.src.rp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864535
--- Comment #6 from Michal Privoznik ---
Darryl,
I've updated the package to reflect your findings. However, In [23] I don't
think /usr/lib{64}/libvirt-designer-1.0.so is provided by any other package but
-devel.
The new set of URLs has prefix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865615
--- Comment #1 from Federico Simoncelli ---
Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4584963
No errors/warnings running fedora-review and rpmlint.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #53 from John D. Ramsdell ---
I found a laptop and did the fedpkg builds outside the firewall.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810676
Björn Persson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(pa...@zhukoff.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864481
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge ---
Hi Massimo,
thank you for the review!
I changed the spec:
- replaced %define with %global
- included LICENSE-JQUERY.txt in %doc
SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/Django14.spec
SRPM: http://www.mat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
Bug 858841 depends on bug 859740, which changed state.
Bug 859740 Summary: php-getid3 ships an unsupported development version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859740
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862160
--- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864481
--- Comment #1 from Massimo Paladin ---
Hi Matthias,
here is the package review:
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[x]: Package does n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859271
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859270
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807383
--- Comment #6 from philip.worr...@googlemail.com ---
I have taken into account the previous comments and corrected the SPEC file.
Please find attached src.rpm and spec file.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/32828830/Fedora/PythonMagick-0.9.7-2.fc16.src.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #37 from Dmitry Butskoy ---
> I'm searching for upstream information, but it seems Thunderbird 17 will
> switch to Gecko ESR tree. As I don't know what is the plan for Seamonkey
Whether Thunderbird only will switch, or whole Mozilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865630
--- Comment #5 from Saveliev Peter ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> - Although PKG-INFO file clearly indicates that the software is GPLv3+ not
> there license file, Since you are the developer can easily include this
> license.
> (Include on %doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822730
Valent Turkovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||valent.turko...@gmail.com
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo