https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837446
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #13 from gil catt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824703
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|gnome-shell-theme-selene-3. |gnome-shell-theme-selene-3.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553
--- Comment #38 from Ivan Romanov ---
Have a look at pkg-config module for CMake.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553
--- Comment #37 from Ivan Romanov ---
Use pkg_search_module instead of find_library.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824703
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||gnome-shell-theme-selene-3.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837446
Clément DAVID changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850641
--- Comment #3 from Mathieu Bridon ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I strongly recommand you include the perl default filter in your spec file.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl_default_filter
I keep forgetting that one. >_<
> Note that some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837446
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
hi Clément,
where you try to build the package? (f17,f18,f19, ..., koji)
your java installation is broken (problem with update-alternatives)
thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837446
--- Comment #10 from Clément DAVID ---
failed to build on mock :
+ jar -xf /builddir/build/SOURCES/opengl-api-gl1.1-android-2.1_r1-sources.jar
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VNGtjJ: line 37: jar: command not found
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823724
--- Comment #10 from Adrian Alves ---
I added all the fixes that u suggested:
Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/github-cli.spec
SRPM URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/github-cli-1.0.0-4.fc16.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837446
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android/opengl-api/2/android-opengl-api.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android/opengl-api/2/android-opengl-api-1.1-3.fc16.src.rpm
- fix build on x86_64
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837446
--- Comment #8 from Clément DAVID ---
failed to build on x86_64 :
+ /usr/lib/jvm/jre/bin/jar -xf
/builddir/build/SOURCES/opengl-api-gl1.1-android-2.1_r1-sources.jar
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.xc6I2w: line 37: /usr/lib/jvm/jre/bin/jar: No such file or
dire
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823337
Julian C. Dunn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jd...@aquezada.com
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859114
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
ops... wrong previous links
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/grizzly/2.2.19/grizzly.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/grizzly/2.2.19/grizzly-2.2.19-1.fc16.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859114
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/grizzly.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/grizzly/2.2.19/grizzly-2.2.19-1.fc16.src.rpm
- update to 2.2.19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854670
Gary Gatling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(gsgat...@ncsu.edu |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837446
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android/opengl-api/1/android-opengl-api.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android/opengl-api/1/android-opengl-api-1.1-2.fc16.src.rpm
- fix javadoc sub package
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822718
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
libesedb-20120102-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libesedb-20120102-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822718
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
libesedb-20120102-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libesedb-20120102-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822718
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
libesedb-20120102-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libesedb-20120102-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822718
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832504
Mr-4 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mr.dash.f...@googlemail.com
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #10 from Domingo Becker ---
(In reply to comment #8)
>
> A lot of issues which needs some explanation.
>
> The macro-in-comment-warnings can be avoided by escaping the macro with a
> second %.
>
Fixed.
> Remove the executable bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868666
Michal Ambroz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||re...@seznam.cz
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845403
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
onesixtyone-0.3.2-8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/onesixtyone-0.3.2-8.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845403
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
onesixtyone-0.3.2-8.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/onesixtyone-0.3.2-8.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845403
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717
Bug ID: 868717
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837446
--- Comment #6 from Clément DAVID ---
Major Issue:
=
[!]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
Note: No /usr/share/javadoc/android-opengl-api found
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837446
Clément DAVID changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868713
Bug ID: 868713
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 18
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753577
--- Comment #18 from Alexey Vasyukov ---
Hello Andre.
Action plan looks absolutely reasonable for me.
We are to update this script as well -
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4532412/RPMS/gmsh-generate-tarball.sh According with
http://fedoraproject.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753577
--- Comment #17 from Andre Massing ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Hi Alexey!
I had a look at the newly added contrib section you posted in comment #12,
here is a short summary of my "investigations":
> I checked contrib/ for gmsh 2.6. In additio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188
--- Comment #11 from Sebastien Caps ---
1. For bz2 I don't know, here it is mentioned to not include bzip2
not sure about bzip2-devel should I add it ?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
2.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855605
Ricky Elrod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||codebl...@elrod.me
--- Comment #3 from Ric
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553
--- Comment #36 from Brendan Jones ---
The wxsqlite3 lib name is dependant on the version of GTK it is built against.
So using find_library(wxcode_gtk2_wxsqlite3-2.8 ) seems to me to be more
restrictive than simply passing a cmake variable at co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865691
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
laditools-1.0.1-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865691
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865995
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865995
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
Package non-session-manager-1.0.0-0.2.gitae6b78cf.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510
--- Comment #43 from nicolas.vievi...@univ-valenciennes.fr ---
Hello Community,
Quick upgrade from last upstream release. New SPEC, SRPMS files and noarch RPMS
packages for testing are provided. New rpmlint reports provided too.
Caution: previou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553
--- Comment #35 from Ivan Romanov ---
bad unbandle patch. you should to use cmake commands to check system wxsqlite3.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788569
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pbrobin...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853514
--- Comment #9 from Alejandro_Perez ---
Details noted and fixed. Thanks for the advice.
http://aeperezt.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/rubygem-clouddb-0.0.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
rpmlint SPECS/rubygem-clouddb.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769958
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553
--- Comment #34 from Ivan Romanov ---
it is strange for me. why spec hasn't wxsqlite3 build requires?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849026
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849026
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|0ad |Package Review
Assignee|pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849026
--- Comment #21 from Brendan Jones ---
Hey Jorn,
just a couple of warnings in your desktop file install:
+ desktop-file-install --dir
/home/bsjones/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/jam-control-1.02-1.fc18.x86_64/usr/share/applications
dist/jam-control.deskto
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853514
--- Comment #8 from Guillermo Gómez ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[x]: Package contains Requires: ruby(abi).
See: http://fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849026
Jørn Lomax changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bioinfornat...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850641
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
=== KEY ===
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #10 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811330
Patrick C. F. Ernzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(t...@redhat.com) |
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866156
--- Comment #2 from Brendan Jones ---
Thanks for the comments!
Addressed and updated:
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/giada.spec
SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/giada-0.5.2-2.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818458
Toby Ovod-Everett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@ovod-everett.org
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866156
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830270
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter ---
* Sun Oct 21 2012 Fabian Affolter - 0.16-1
- Updated to new upstrem release
Updated files:
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-hgdistver.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868666
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB)
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188
--- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter ---
Please refer to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868666
Bug ID: 868666
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753577
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|d...@danny.cz|
Component|0ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753577
--- Comment #16 from Andre Massing ---
Hi!
Just for your information, I updated gmsh-cmake-soname.patch in my public
dropbox folder. Your LIB_INSTALL_DIR related line was added and I renamed the
static library name as well (just for consistency)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865691
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
laditools-1.0.1-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/laditools-1.0.1-5.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865691
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
laditools-1.0.1-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/laditools-1.0.1-5.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865691
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865995
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
non-session-manager-1.0.0-0.2.gitae6b78cf.fc17 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/non-session-manager-1.0.0-0.2.gitae6b78cf.fc17
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865995
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
non-session-manager-1.0.0-0.2.gitae6b78cf.fc18 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/non-session-manager-1.0.0-0.2.gitae6b78cf.fc18
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865995
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827649
--- Comment #18 from Adrian Alves ---
rpmlint ../SRPMS/supercat-0.5.5-4.fc16.src.rpm
supercat.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml,
ht-ml
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827649
--- Comment #17 from Adrian Alves ---
its already there:
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753577
--- Comment #15 from Andre Massing ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Hi Alexey!
> Hello Andre.
>
> I tried to build gmsh 2.6.1 recently. Summary:
> - It mostly works
> - Patches 1-3 should be updated to work with new sources. It is important
> sin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821917
--- Comment #7 from maciek.borze...@gmail.com ---
I've updated to 0.9.9.
Spec URL: http://fiona.dmcs.pl/~mborzecki/fedora/mu/mu.spec
SRPM URL: http://fiona.dmcs.pl/~mborzecki/fedora/mu/mu-0.9.9-2.fc17.src.rpm
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188
--- Comment #8 from Sebastien Caps ---
Yes, I still looking for a sponsor.
Fedora Account System Username: virer
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
--- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
I've updated the package again.
Spec URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.2-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188
--- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter ---
Are you still looking for a sponsor?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823724
--- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> which way did u suggest?
> %setup -qn %{name}-%{version}
%setup -q
> which dir I unowned?
See comment from Mario
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854723
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter ---
Just some more comments...
- One requirement per line would it make much easier to review than a
comma-separated list
- unrar is only available in RPM Fusion but not in Fedora.
- Source0 should point to th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827649
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|m...@fabian-aff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736163
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753577
--- Comment #14 from Alexey Vasyukov ---
> > 1. blossom/
[snip]
> This license appears to be non-free. Blocking FE-LEGAL for guidance.
Exactly
>
> Is this library absolutely required to use this software?
>
I guess not. Most probably, we can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553
--- Comment #33 from MartinKG ---
Spec URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/guayadeque/guayadeque-0.3.6-7.svn1830/guayadeque.spec?a=Ntrj_2u3E34
SRPM URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/guayadeque/guayadeque-0.3.6-7.s
82 matches
Mail list logo
