https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #10 from Erik Schilling ---
About license: https://github.com/clintbellanger/flare-game/wiki/Credits
I simply listed all licenses
About the font: I was not able to find this version of the font in fedora. So i
left it there. Is this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #2 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
I forgot, please include a %doc section, and include files COPYING, README
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25files_section
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||echevemas...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/maven-native/1/maven-native.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/maven-native/1/maven-native-1.0-0.2.alpha.7.fc16.src.rpm
- fix javac target
tested on: http://koji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862160
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
valkyrie-2.0.0-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/valkyrie-2.0.0-5.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862160
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
valkyrie-2.0.0-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/valkyrie-2.0.0-5.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862160
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
valkyrie-2.0.0-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/valkyrie-2.0.0-5.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862160
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
valkyrie-2.0.0-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/valkyrie-2.0.0-5.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862160
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
Bug ID: 871216
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: low
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraprojec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870853
--- Comment #1 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
*** Bug 768894 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768894
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825409
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||871205
--- Comment #3 from Rich Mattes --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871205
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||825409
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870853
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871204
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||871205
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871205
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||871204, 871203
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871203
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||871205
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871205
Bug ID: 871205
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870615
Andrew Colin Kissa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #15 from An
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871204
Bug ID: 871204
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862160
--- Comment #28 from Mario Blättermann ---
Go to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/, log in and click on "New
update" in the left pane. Then you can add the Koji builds and submit them for
testing. Don't forget to submit the bug number and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871203
Bug ID: 871203
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868939
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870788
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||871197
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871197
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||870788
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871197
Bug ID: 871197
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870323
--- Comment #4 from Damian Wrobel ---
Everything else has been corrected. Please find updated files.
Spec URL: http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SPECS/glogg.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SRPMS/g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862854
--- Comment #13 from Mario Blättermann ---
Packages for f17, f18 and Rawhide have been built successfully, but I can't
find any updates in Bodhi. What's the matter?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871003
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann ---
Thanks for the suggestion. Additionally I've added the scriptlets for updating
the desktop database. Well, it is not needed for the time being, because we
have no MimeType entry in the desktop file, but t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862160
--- Comment #27 from Nathan Scott ---
Ah, thanks for the reminder Mario. I'm not sure whether I've missed a step -
usually at this point I would use the web interface to mark the packages as
"submitted for testing" ... but,
https://admin.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862160
--- Comment #26 from Mario Blättermann ---
Packages for all requested branches have been built, but I cannot find anything
in Bodhi. What's the matter?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870323
--- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich ---
You're right! qmake is responsible for the hidden directory. And as you pointed
out, that is common. I don't know of a concrete policy, but it could be a
useful addition to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833226
--- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Thanks for reminding me Mario.
> I tested again using mock, using release fedora-rawhide-x86_64. This runs
> fine and creates both a srpm and a rpm.
>
> In addition I tested us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867396
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|volke...@gmx.at
Flags|fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846488
--- Comment #7 from Yannick Brosseau ---
Finally we have the 1.0 release,
Updated spec and SRPM:
SPEC: http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/SPECS/babeltrace.spec
SRPM:
http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/SRPMS/babeltrace-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871191
--- Comment #1 from Kamil Páral ---
fedora-review output attached. I'm not sure why rpmlint complains about invalid
AGPLv3+ license, because the identifier is taken directly from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main .
Package Review
==
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860283
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871191
Kamil Páral changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871191
Bug ID: 871191
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868936
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867396
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865303
--- Comment #8 from Brendan Jones ---
Cheers. Updated links:
SRPM:
http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/realTimeConfigQuickScan-0-0.5.20120506hg.fc18.src.rpm
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/realTimeConfigQuickScan.spec
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811661
Brendan Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863793
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok ---
Beta release here:
http://members.axion.net/~enrique/reprap_python_beanshell.zip includes AGPLv3.
It will be in the next release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #12 from Sourav Basu ---
I do not know why installation errors are not reproduced. I used:
[tumu@tumu i686]$ fedora-review -p -r -n
vdr-live-0.2.0-7.20121009git.fc18.src.rpm
Also another problem with your package is that installatio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863793
--- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Can you give a quote about the AGPL version? The code claims AGPL, but I
couldn't find a note about which version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #9 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Can you explain why the license for the data sub-package is "CC-BY-SA and CC-BY
and CC0 and Public Domain"? README claims it is "CC-BY-SA 3.0. Later versions
are permitted.".
There's one more bundled font:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
Guillermo Gómez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869610
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870649
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
argtable-2.13-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869610
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
glassfish-saaj-1.3.19-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870649
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870631
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
libnatspec-0.2.6-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865997
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870631
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865997
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
caledonia-kde-theme-1.2.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869301
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
erlpmd-2.0.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868325
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866982
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-gem-patch-0.1.3-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869301
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866982
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868325
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
expatpp-0-1.20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868908
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-gem-nice-install-0.2.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868908
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188
Greg Swift changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gregsw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Gr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #11 from MartinKG ---
cannot reproduce the installation errors with a lokal review with:
[martin@localhost tmp]$ fedora-review -m fedora-18-x86_64-rpmfusion_free -n
vdr-live
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857705
--- Comment #5 from Matthew Miller ---
Other than that, everything looks good to go:
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857705
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Miller ---
Do we need to have the devel package require pkgconfig for
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863796
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/printrun.spec
SRPM URL:
http://repo.hroncok.cz/SRPMS/printrun-0.0-10.20120924gitb6935b93.fc17.src.rpm
- Switched generic names and names in desktop files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863793
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/skeinforge.spec
SRPM URL: http://repo.hroncok.cz/SRPMS/skeinforge-12.03.14-8.fc17.src.rpm
- Added desktop file
- Don't use macros for rm and cp
- Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865303
--- Comment #7 from Clément DAVID ---
No worries :), I got only one applicable issue from the fedora-review tool.
Please fix it by adding a %doc COPYING as a file.
Issues:
===
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750394
--- Comment #34 from Roderick Johnstone ---
Any progress on fixing the EL6 issue from comment #32?
I'd like to build this package on EL6.
I tried rebuilding the srpm at:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/dmtcp-1.2.6-1.fc17.src.rpm on Scie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852211
--- Comment #23 from Lukas Zapletal ---
Will do bump, but I need the review of the INIH library first ;-) ^^^
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868908
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-gem-nice-install-0.2.0-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-gem-nice-install-0.2.0-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868908
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868908
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-gem-nice-install-0.2.0-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-gem-nice-install-0.2.0-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|All |noarch
Version|rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868879
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092
Bug ID: 871092
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799702
--- Comment #6 from Tomas Radej ---
Sorry that it took so long.
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: Package installs properly.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865303
--- Comment #6 from Brendan Jones ---
Apologies:
Updated source also.
SRPM:
http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/realTimeConfigQuickScan-0-0.4.20120506hg.fc18.src.rpm
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/realTimeConfigQuickScan.spec
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869610
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
glassfish-saaj-1.3.19-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glassfish-saaj-1.3.19-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869610
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869610
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
glassfish-saaj-1.3.19-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glassfish-saaj-1.3.19-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870860
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Clone Of|864187 |825489
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854386
--- Comment #8 from Alejandro_Perez ---
Thanks for the notice. it has been done.
http://aeperezt.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/rubygem-openstack-quantum-client.spec
http://aeperezt.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/rubygem-openstack-quantum-client-0.1.5-3.fc17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868325
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
expatpp-0-1.20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/expatpp-0-1.20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868325
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865303
Clément DAVID changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868325
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
expatpp-0-1.20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/expatpp-0-1.20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869861
--- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer ---
The rpm seemed otherwise good, so do we wait for next upstream release ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866982
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-gem-patch-0.1.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-gem-patch-0.1.3-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866982
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-gem-patch-0.1.3-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-gem-patch-0.1.3-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866982
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
