https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823122
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
hi Michael,
isn't true. debian for e.g. split zookepeer in several packages
see http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/zookeeper
for now i haven't intention to add a systemd script,
use only java package just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864315
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #16 from Erik Schilling ---
Hello, Thanks for the comments
I will talk with upstream about using a different font
Will find a way to link flare against bundeled SDL_gfx. Thanks for pointing out
this duplication. Did not noticed it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
--- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Hi,
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/xword/xword.spec
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/xword/xword-1.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
Corrected issues outlined above.
Can you please set the review flag to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871511
--- Comment #4 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Hi Juan
No needed the macro %{?_isa} in subpackage frontend.
I suggest contacting with the upstream to report the bug or once approved the
package, build and test in devel branch for a time
Regards
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832831
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
--- Comment #5 from Robin Lee ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864315
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
sha-1.0.4b-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sha-1.0.4b-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855588
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen ---
It is better to patch the flag default in the .cabal file actually for tools
like cabal-rpm - sorry didn't think to mention that earlier.
Since the flag is only needed for ghc > 7.2, ie currently only f18 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
sha-1.0.4b-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sha-1.0.4b-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
I know. The software, though, is simple and works. Not a lot of updates
required IMO. It's only one python file, so shouldn't be much of an issue.
Ankur
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
sha-1.0.4b-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sha-1.0.4b-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robinlee.s...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092
Christoph Wickert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|17 |rawhide
--- Comment #4 from Christop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #13 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Sourav:
"""
Buildroot used: fedora-16-i386
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -p -r -n
vdr-live-0.2.0-7.20121009git.fc18.src.rpm
"""
I wonder how you built it though. See fedora-review's "-m".
--
You
a1 I keep using bundled library since it have some differences
sha1.count in the class
->I will publish the patch upstream asap and try to find a way to fix in
future release.
SRPM:
http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/20121030/reprepro-4.12.3-4.fc16.src.rpm
SPEC:
http://repo.virer.net/Packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870323
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823122
--- Comment #9 from Michael Scherer ---
Why is the rpm splitted in several rpms ? I see there is only 1 package on
debian/ubuntu.
And I think you also miss a systemd file for the server.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870323
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|volke...@gmx.at
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871511
--- Comment #3 from Juan Orti Alcaine ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> 1. If at all (running autogen.sh while building is a bad idea), then
> autogen.sh should be run in "%prep" (and not in %build)
I have dropped the use of autogen.sh, now I use t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hi Antonio,
>
> the package doesnt build.
Hi Benedikt.
Why you say that ?
What's up ?
>
> You have to write the BuildRequires like that:
> BuildRequires: pkgconfig, gettext,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
Bug ID: 871629
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexes...@yahoo.com
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #15 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Please use the name macro on Source1.
As you already said, the license for the data sub-package was found correct:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2012-October/001992.html
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #14 from Volker Fröhlich ---
I found parts of SDL_gfx bundled. Please link the system library instead:
SDL_gfxBlitFunc.h
SDL_gfxBlitFunc.c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852254
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann ---
Ping...?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871605
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867396
Maxim Burgerhout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Maxim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871604
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863795
Karol Trzcionka changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID|FedoraHosted 230|
--- Comment #5 from Karol Trzcionka
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863795
Karol Trzcionka changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||FedoraHosted 230
--- Comment #4 from K
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871605
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871604
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824218
--- Comment #11 from Mario Blättermann ---
Requires: python-gtk2
This doesn't exist for Fedora, and we don't have a package which provides it
virtually. We have pygtk2 only.
(In reply to comment #10)
> -> you must require (I suggest hicolor-ic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871605
Bug ID: 871605
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871604
Bug ID: 871604
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823682
--- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann ---
Just a reminder, sent out once a month ... as usual ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827101
--- Comment #10 from Mario Blättermann ---
Just a reminder, sent out once a month ... as usual ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862160
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
Package valkyrie-2.0.0-5.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum updat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753577
--- Comment #20 from Andre Massing ---
Hi!
A small update on the contrib sources after being in contact with upstream:
- HighOrderMeshOptimizer
gmsh module under heavy development, license has not been chosen yet.
- lbfgs: same code as upst
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871003
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871003
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
obapps-0.1.7-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862160
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870615
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
snmptt-1.4-0.6.beta2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870615
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868936
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
python-apsw-3.7.11.r1-7.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868936
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860283
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860283
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
dmlite-plugins-profiler-0.4.0-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862854
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862854
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-slimit-0.7.4-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868939
--- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4640590
$ rpmlint -i -v *
python-llfuse.src: I: checking
python-llfuse.src: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/python-llfuse/
(time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092
--- Comment #1 from Benedikt Schäfer ---
Hi Antonio,
the package doesnt build.
You have to write the BuildRequires like that:
BuildRequires: pkgconfig, gettext, ..., ..., ...
also the
Requires: pycairo, ..., ...
Note: I am not a packanger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865303
--- Comment #10 from Brendan Jones ---
The QucikScan is a convenience script which ensures that QuickScan.pl is
executed in the application directory. I odn't think upstream have given a
great deal of thought to making this simple script portable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823122
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/zookeeper/3/zookeeper.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/zookeeper/3/zookeeper-3.4.4-3.fc16.src.rpm
- fix missing hostname
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870615
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
snmptt-1.4-0.6.beta2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snmptt-1.4-0.6.beta2.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870615
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
snmptt-1.4-0.6.beta2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snmptt-1.4-0.6.beta2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870615
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
snmptt-1.4-0.6.beta2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snmptt-1.4-0.6.beta2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870615
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
snmptt-1.4-0.6.beta2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snmptt-1.4-0.6.beta2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870615
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871511
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868936
--- Comment #16 from Marcel Wysocki ---
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-apsw-3.7.11.r1-7.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-apsw-3.7.11.r1-7.fc18
awesome, thanks man :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868936
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
python-apsw-3.7.11.r1-7.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-apsw-3.7.11.r1-7.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868936
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-apsw-3.7.11.r1-7.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-apsw-3.7.11.r1-7.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868936
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Kofler ---
We have one or two versions of the Unifont as actual bitmap fonts in Fedora, in
particular, we definitely have WQY Bitmap Song, I'm not sure whether we also
have it packaged as Unifont.
If you really need it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871511
--- Comment #1 from Juan Orti Alcaine ---
Spec URL: http://jorti.fedorapeople.org/heimdall/heimdall.spec
SRPM URL: http://jorti.fedorapeople.org/heimdall/heimdall-1.3.2-2.fc17.src.rpm
Updated Spec to remove unnecessary dependency
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #12 from Erik Schilling ---
The answer we got from the mailling list is correct i think. CC BY SA would be
the most restrictive license. I *could* list only this license since all other
mentioned licenses are less restrictive. I am no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847504
--- Comment #21 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Spec URL:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-scoped_search/rubygem-scoped_search.spec
SRPM URL:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-scoped_search/rubygem-scoped_search-2.4.0-4.fc17.src.rpm
I rebas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860283
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
dmlite-plugins-profiler-0.4.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dmlite-plugins-profiler-0.4.0-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860283
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
dmlite-plugins-profiler-0.4.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dmlite-plugins-profiler-0.4.0-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860283
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
dmlite-plugins-profiler-0.4.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dmlite-plugins-profiler-0.4.0-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860283
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
dmlite-plugins-profiler-0.4.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dmlite-plugins-profiler-0.4.0-2.el5
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860283
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823122
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
--- Comment #7 from Mich
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871511
Bug ID: 871511
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868936
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860283
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862854
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-slimit-0.7.4-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-slimit-0.7.4-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862854
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
python-slimit-0.7.4-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-slimit-0.7.4-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862854
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871003
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871003
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
obapps-0.1.7-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/obapps-0.1.7-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871003
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
obapps-0.1.7-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/obapps-0.1.7-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860283
Ricardo Rocha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Ricardo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868936
Marcel Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #12 from Marcel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860283
--- Comment #7 from Ricardo Rocha ---
Thanks Mario!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871003
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
Gustav Gonzalez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865116
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann ---
Keep in mind, if you link to packages from a Koji scratch build, these packages
will be crowded after two weeks. This has been happened now... That's why the
links to rpm and srpm are 404.
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870978
--- Comment #1 from Adrian Reber ---
Spec URL: http://lisas.de/~adrian/rpm/libcdio-paranoia.spec
SRPM URL: http://lisas.de/~adrian/rpm/libcdio-paranoia-10.2+0.90-2.fc17.src.rpm
* Tue Oct 30 2012 Adrian Reber - 10.2+0.90-2
- added missing files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865116
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||852211 (dunst)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852211
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||865116
Alias|
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
