https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873454
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873454
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873454
--- Comment #7 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
APPROVED.
Please remove intltool from BR. mate-common provides it.
Please address the following before import:
[!]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
Note: Patch0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873454
--- Comment #8 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Builds fine on F18 with mate-desktop-1.5.3-3 in BR overrite and fc19 rawhide.
Will worry about f17 and f16 later (probably use version 1.4).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870197
--- Comment #2 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
Spec URL:
http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/mate-file-archiver/2/mate-file-archiver.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869088
Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #19 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the review. The --disable-static doesn't have any effect, and hence
have used the find syntax. I have made the other necessary changes.
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855829
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870432
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-openid-auth-0.4-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-openid-auth-0.4-2.fc18
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870432
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864481
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806516
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830418
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853124
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873643
Bug ID: 873643
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829865
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866012
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866154
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873454
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819919
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
--- Comment #20 from Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Another issue is that I can't patch the compressed js files without
recompressing them from the uncompressed files. Unless there is an js
compression tool in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
--- Comment #21 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #20)
That seems bad in a practical sense from an open source point of view. If we
can't reasonably patch the software, it's a big problem. I hate to add more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717
--- Comment #6 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://pub.progdan.cz/specs/libtvdb.spec
SRPM URL: http://pub.progdan.cz/specs/libtvdb-0.3.0-3.fc18.src.rpm
* Tue Nov 06 2012 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com - 0.3.0-3
- Fixed license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018
--- Comment #39 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com ---
Adrian, your unbundling attempt did exactly nothing to fix the bundling
problem. All you did was point to an external header but still compile and link
the internal libraries.
I've
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873736
Bug ID: 873736
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873738
Bug ID: 873738
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873738
--- Comment #1 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org ---
Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/omegat-fedora-feature/sequence-library.spec
SRPM URL:
http://olea.org/tmp/omegat-fedora-feature/sequence-library-1.0.2.20121003svn-2.fc17.src.rpm
Description: A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018
--- Comment #40 from Adrian Alves aal...@gmail.com ---
Stephen, Am sorry but I dont like the idea that you take over my package. We
can work together on this am more than glad to add any suggestion but not to
take it away from me. All my effort
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829865
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-MARC-XML-0.93-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MARC-XML-0.93-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829865
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873738
Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||873748
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829865
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-MARC-XML-0.93-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MARC-XML-0.93-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
--- Comment #22 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
If the minify step consists of running jsMin, then I can only strongly
recommend skipping that step, because jsMin is infected with the same silly no
Evil license clause as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853514
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853514
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-clouddb-0.0.1-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-clouddb-0.0.1-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873738
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853514
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-clouddb-0.0.1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-clouddb-0.0.1-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873738
--- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
1. Pre-release packages should have the .svnXXX suffix in Release field, not
in Version. They should be Version: 1.0.2 and Release: 0.1.svn20121003.
In case
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873787
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873787
Bug ID: 873787
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
--- Comment #23 from Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #21)
Of course we could skip that minify step and serve uncompressed js files,
though that would increase the net traffic. This would be as open source as
it can be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865303
--- Comment #19 from Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com ---
%filter_provides_in %{_datadir}/%{name}
%filter_requires_in %{_datadir}/%{name}
Should fix all the perl provides/requires issues in a simple way.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873793
Bug ID: 873793
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535
--- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Mario, I thought I wrote a note to the list but it must have gotten lost in the
tubes.. perhaps queued for moderation?
Either way, do you think my removal of the explicit Conflicts tag is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865303
--- Comment #20 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
Well, that doesn't pick up the perl provides
I can use the following which is simpler than the large block before.
%global __provides_exclude
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813
Bug ID: 873813
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813
--- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4659699
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870432
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-openid-auth-0.4-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829865
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829865
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-MARC-XML-0.93-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870432
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873793
Antonio Trande trp...@katamail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trp...@katamail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
--- Comment #24 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Let's do that, and then maybe eventually use yuicompressor?
Thats the way debian does it. But as long as we don't need to modify js files
and don't have a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873793
--- Comment #2 from Minh Ngo nlmin...@gmail.com ---
- Why are you not edit %description more explicitly ?
How to edit more explicitly? This utility can only start in daemon or not and
shows a keyboard layout :).
- In Source0, you can use this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836840
--- Comment #10 from bebo_sudo bebo.s...@gmail.com ---
Hi all,
a new version has been released so I changed a little the spec and rebuilt the
srpm.
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857730
--- Comment #8 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
ping
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863719
Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863719
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Please use a Package Change Request for a new branch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863719
Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863719
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
liblognorm-0.3.4-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liblognorm-0.3.4-4.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866325
--- Comment #14 from Yuliya Algaer yalg...@unipro.ru ---
Peter, ping! What are our next steps?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
65 matches
Mail list logo
