Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857079
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiv
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811661
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiv
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954
--- Comment #10 from Michael Scherer ---
1) I think you can do it yourself once you are in the packager group in the
account system ( FAS ). But you first need a sponsor.
2) mhh, I do not understand the question, can you explain
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879752
--- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer ---
no, orphaned packages are package that were uploaded in the repository, and who
are no longer under the responsability of someone. This package was not
uploaded yet.
However, maybe you mean
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870860
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
opencsg-1.3.2-6.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870860
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864187
Bug 864187 depends on bug 870860, which changed state.
Bug 870860 Summary: Review Request: opencsg - Library for Constructive Solid
Geometry using OpenGL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870860
What|Rem
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866428
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
php-theseer-fDOMDocument-1.3.2-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866463
Bug 866463 depends on bug 866428, which changed state.
Bug 866428 Summary: Review Request: php-theseer-fDOMDocument - An Extension to
PHP standard DOM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866428
What|Remove
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866428
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
csmith-2.1.0-6.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866463
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
php-phpunit-FinderFacade-1.0.5-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866463
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864531
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
opensaml-java-2.5.3-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864531
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |CURRENTRELEASE
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870184
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
drumkv1-0.1.0-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870184
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829809
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
python-svg-0.2.2b-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829809
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843997
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
mlpack-1.0.1-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878612
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pexpect-2.5.1-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878612
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874238
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874238
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
domtt-0.7.3-6.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875735
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
fedora-jam-kde-theme-1.0.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875735
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839097
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
python-flask-autoindex-0.4.1-6.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839097
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |CURRENTRELEASE
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856238
Bug 856238 depends on bug 861633, which changed state.
Bug 861633 Summary: update squeak-vm to 4.10.x series
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861633
What|Removed |Added
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879933
--- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) ---
Susi Lehtola thanks to the hint.
(In reply to comment #1)
> The build fails for me:
>
> "
> -- Looking for C++ include OIS.h - not found
> could not find the OIS include
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-css-text-0.1.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-css-text-0.1.1-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879749
--- Comment #9 from Alex ---
hey I think uploading this in the fedora review will mark it as a duplicate so
I post the links above. it the same source but file is uploaded.
just waiting for a sponsor
--
You are receiving this m
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879749
--- Comment #8 from Alex ---
hey I think uploading this in the fedora review will mark it as a duplicate so
I post the links above. it the same source but file is uploaded.
just waiting for a sponsor
--
You are receiving this m
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879752
--- Comment #2 from Alex ---
does this need to be orphaned?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@l
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954
--- Comment #9 from Alex ---
I sent it
I have a few questions:
1) for the packager database, should the ownership be taken if devel approves
or should I add myself to the list?
2) is svc-admin a git repo command line or a pack
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ---
No. devel-owner goes only to the admin(s) of the list.
You should subscribe, then mail 'de...@lists.fedoraproject.org'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954
--- Comment #7 from Alex ---
should I mail to this devel?
devel-ow...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-r
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878236
Gianluca Sforna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905
--- Comment #11 from Anderson Silva ---
So, here is my theory:
The SPEC on drupal6-drush does a postun: unlink /usr/bin/drush and the
"erasing" of drupal6-drush is happening after installation of php-drush-drush
rpm.
So, postun
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905
--- Comment #10 from Anderson Silva ---
For what is worth:
I have spin up a new host and:
Manually removed drual6-drush
yum locallinstall php-drush-drush (and the other rpm)
I did this w/o running a drush cc all -u 1 (with the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875506
--- Comment #13 from Philippe Makowski ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-fdb
Short Description: Firebird RDBMS bindings for Python
Owners: makowski
Branches: f17 f18 el6
InitialCC:
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954
--- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer ---
Nice, so I guess you should start right now, the first step is to send a email
on fedora-devel, to see why it was orphaned. make sure to also explain that you
are not yet a packager and that
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905
--- Comment #9 from Shawn Iwinski ---
(In reply to comment #8)
There has to be some sort of cache somewhere. I had a system with drush custom
installed in /usr/local/bin and /usr/share/drush. I removed the custom
install, insta
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387
--- Comment #1 from Andrew McNabb ---
I submitted this srpm to koji, and it built without any errors:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4730498
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387
Bug ID: 880387
Summary: Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for
MongoDB
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sever
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863796
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok ---
Sorry for that. I've only raised the revision number in the link and forget to
change the commit number and date.
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/printrun.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875506
--- Comment #12 from Philippe Makowski ---
thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedor
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879931
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hm, the spec looks like mine from
> http://fedora.danny.cz/danny/development/SRPMS/repoview/angelscript.html :-)
Absolutely! You may find it cop
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855605
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Co
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879928
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||8803
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863796
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Co
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294
--- Comment #14 from Michael Shigorin ---
Created attachment 652233
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=652233&action=edit
spec accepted into ALT Linux Sisyphus
Here's a brief overview of changes to get it working
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879932
--- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) ---
Thank you for the comments. All addressed.
http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora17/SocketW/SocketW.spec
http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora17/SocketW/SocketW-031026-2.fc17.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018
Ron changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jokeyrh...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875299
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877763
--- Comment #6 from Ivan Romanov ---
I couldn't to use this application. When I started it it has no any photos and
I couldn't find any way to add them.
In .spec you use https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Photos but About of
Gnom
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875299
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841266
Ray Pete changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(raymondpete@fedor |
|aproject.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954
--- Comment #5 from Alex ---
yeah i am willing to do it
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880195
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877763
Ivan Romanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You ar
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878653
--- Comment #8 from Ivan Romanov ---
License text issue fixed by upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
p
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841266
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(raymondpete@f
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853775
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
packa
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are rec
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155
--- Comment #6 from Richard Hughes ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: PackageKit-Qt
Short Description: Qt support library for PackageKit
Owners: rhughes rdieter
Branches: f17 f18
InitialCC: rdieter
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155
--- Comment #5 from Richard Hughes ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> invert the order of your changelog (newest first), and we have a winner. :)
Gahh, Monday :) Sorry about that. Fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879435
--- Comment #5 from Adrienne Thompson ---
Having given further thought to the problem, I have decided that my workload
does not allow the task of building the SRPM any time in the near future.
Extrapolating the download statistic
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
pack
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
Bug 766166 depends on bug 761619, which changed state.
Bug 761619 Summary: Review Request: cross-binutils - Multiple cross-build
binutils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761619
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761619
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847322
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resoluti
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155
--- Comment #3 from Richard Hughes ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> 1. MUST: need some Obsoletes (and at least a temporary Provides) here to
> handle upgrade from older PackageKit-qt...
>
> Obsoletes: PackageKit-qt < 0.8.6
> Prov
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813
--- Comment #9 from Ralph Bean ---
Cool. Thanks :)
Just for posterity, here's one more new release that fixes the ctrl-C issue we
talked about in IRC and removes those python macros.
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/gnome-she
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter ---
$ rpmlint *.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
naming: ok
sources: ok
41f6fa67e980733d7d8a2cd881bbe5b4 PackageKit-Qt-0.8.6.tar.gz
license: ok
$ licensecheck -r src
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876915
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Ok, I've re-created the git repo, try it now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
libtvdb-0.3.0-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtvdb-0.3.0-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876915
--- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Can you fedpkg clone?
Yes, I can. It got stuck during fedpkg import, at file uploading.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
packa
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876915
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Can you fedpkg clone?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@list
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179
Paul P Komkoff Jr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
libtvdb-0.3.0-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtvdb-0.3.0-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I'll be taking a two-week vacation now, so I won't be able to look at this
> until I get back.
Whoops...
Anyway, I have rebased the package to 0.2.5, otherwise the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954
--- Comment #4 from Alex ---
in order for it to be process I have to change the version? or the release?
according to my course it has to be fully maintain not orphaned.
got to check with ctyler first, not sure.
--
You are rec
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813
--- Comment #7 from Michael Scherer ---
I am on f18, 64 bits, running gnome-shell. My account is mscherer.
However, i just noted that I gave a wrong password, so maybe that's the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880203
Josef Stribny changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|rubygem-strong_parameters - |Review Request:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880203
Josef Stribny changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|strong_parameters - |rubygem-strong_parameters
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954
--- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer ---
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rssh
2.3.3
However, the package seems to be orphaned, so someone need to take care of it.
Are you willing to do it ?
That's the same as pushing
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879903
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
packa
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880203
Bug ID: 880203
Summary: strong_parameters - Permitted and required parameters
for Action Pack
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
