Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863796
--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/printrun.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/printrun-0.0-13.20121103git6fa47668f2.fc17.src.rpm
- Do not download th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863793
--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/skeinforge.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/skeinforge-12.03.14-9.fc17.src.rpm
- Do not download the desktop file
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889505
--- Comment #7 from Eric Radman ---
Okay, further corrections applied:
- Updated the .spec to create separate -spec and -devel packages
- Install manpages using .* instead of .gz
- Run ldconfig directly from %post and %postrun
r
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823340
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #1
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823340
--- Comment #6 from Julian C. Dunn ---
Fixed.
http://jdunn.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-ipaddress/rubygem-ipaddress-0.8.0-3.fc19.src.rpm
http://jdunn.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-ipaddress/rubygem-ipaddress.spec
--
You are receiving th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt ---
I'm not worried. I don't suggest putting the stuff into standard search path.
;)
And gtk2? Hey! :) Check this out:
$ yum list gtk+|grep ^g
gtk+.i686 1:1.2.10-73.fc
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849379
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Steffan ---
Spec URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/graphite-web.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/graphite-web-0.9.10-4.fc17.src.rpm
Updated to use mod_wsgi as mod_pytho
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849379
Dan Mashal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849379
--- Comment #15 from Dan Mashal ---
Naming - OK
Licensing - OK - 1 file with BSD license should be covered by Apache license
rpmlint on RPM/SPEC/SRPM - OK no errors.
Koji scratch builds:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/task
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890772
Bug ID: 890772
Summary: Review Request: tvlsim - Travel Market Simulator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890771
Bug ID: 890771
Summary: Review Request: edje - Abstract GUI layout and
animation object library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851768
Ville Skyttä changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.sky...@iki.fi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890769
Bug ID: 890769
Summary: Review Request: Embryo - Small Pawn based virtual
machine and compiler.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877651
--- Comment #27 from Paulo Andrade
---
Updated package:
- Update to sagemath 5.5.
- Add maxima.system patch to work with maxima 5.29.1 package.
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/sagemath.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorape
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882090
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-nose-progressive-1.3-3.el6, python-blessings-1.5-1.el6 has been pushed
to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882084
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-nose-progressive-1.3-3.el6, python-blessings-1.5-1.el6 has been pushed
to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888224
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt ---
> Group: Development/Libraries
It's possible to omit the Group tag, but if it's filled in, base libraries
enter group "System Environment/Libraries". Only the corresponding -deve
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836810
Sébastien Willmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Commen
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #8 from David Nečas ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> If an external Gwyddion plug-in written in Perl were to be packaged...
I promise to rewrite personally the thing to C or pygwy in such case. Or just
package the thre
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888224
--- Comment #9 from Ken Dreyer ---
Created attachment 670170
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=670170&action=edit
patch to remove libssl link
Hi Lorenzo,
Good job on your package. I noticed five things to updat
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885038
--- Comment #13 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Which is what I've just tried, because I was curious to figure out how much
> effort would be needed to adhere to the Games SIG's packaging guidelines.
>
If you
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt ---
> much grief
More like going in circles, also due to misunderstandings, IMO. In the old
review in bug 187294 comment 26 it was said:
| not having the modules as regular modules isn't a bl
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740687
Vedran Miletić changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(riva...@gmail.com |
|)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiving thi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890717
--- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer ---
* I personally think the BuildRequires are easier to view with 1 BR per line
(especially for patch or diff )
BuildRequires: libeina-devel >= %version gstreamer-plugins-base-devel
BuildReq
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740687
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807821
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890717
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec URL: https://github.com/hroncok/SPECS/raw/master/perl-Math-Clipper.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/perl-Math-Clipper-1.16-1.fc17.src.rpm
- New version
- Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807821
--- Comment #6 from Vedran Miletić ---
Created attachment 670115
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=670115&action=edit
Required patches
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807821
--- Comment #5 from Vedran Miletić ---
Created attachment 670114
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=670114&action=edit
ns-3.16 RPM spec file
Massive update for 3.16.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #6 from David Nečas ---
If I knew how much grief the plug-in system would create
I will try to clarify one point: The plug-in system is ill-conceived but real
people use it and depend on it; we care about compatib
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823340
--- Comment #5 from Michael Scherer ---
You moved the license file out of the main package, and that's against the
guideline :
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
Please correct, otherwise,
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890733
Bug ID: 890733
Summary: Review Request: mkproject - make project skeletons
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priori
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874980
--- Comment #7 from Alec Leamas ---
Hi! To get this review rolling I need you to reply to my remarks! If anything
is unclear (some of the remarks are admittedly somewhat vague) just let me
know, and we'll sort it out together.
--
36 matches
Mail list logo
