Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883472
--- Comment #11 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > I'd say that having lnst package with the files from common and proper
> > documentation saying what's needed would suffice
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894664
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883472
--- Comment #10 from Radek Pazdera ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I'd say that having lnst package with the files from common and proper
> documentation saying what's needed would suffice here. The problem with
> practically usele
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883472
--- Comment #9 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > - Why is the main package empty and doesn't get built? Wouldn't it make more
> > sense to move the files from the -common sub
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895077
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894665
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846488
--- Comment #11 from Brendan Jones ---
Here's how you can do it (your tests are being built, but not run).
--- babeltrace.spec2012-10-29 22:04:15.0 +0100
+++ babeltrace_mod.spec2013-01-15 07:38:44.571167794 +0100
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891198
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887756
--- Comment #3 from Brendan Jones ---
New version removes the need for the patches.
I have queried upstream about the licence. This time round he has included a
COPYING file which is GPLV3, although GPLV3 is not mentioned anywher
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895226
--- Comment #1 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Hi Luis
Don't needed remove these files:
find . -name "*.js" -exec rm -rfv '{}' \;
I removed this line and this is what rpmlint complains (e.g):
python-django-grappelli.noarch: E: scr
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887756
--- Comment #2 from Yannick Brosseau ---
Some quick first comments:
You should put the d in the version number field.
Also, a new upstream version is available (0.1.2).
It's true that the licensing is a little bit confusing. T
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895226
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||echevemas...@gmail.c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891436
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
lua-markdown-0.32-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
ht
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890482
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
vimpal-1.1.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891438
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876043
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
xfce-theme-manager-0.2.3-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this m
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876043
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
xfce-theme-manager-0.2.3-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this m
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823332
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-mixlib-log-1.4.1-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823332
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823334
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-mixlib-config-1.1.2-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from t
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891436
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
lua-markdown-0.32-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
ht
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866012
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891436
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889901
Bug 889901 depends on bug 891436, which changed state.
Bug 891436 Summary: Review Request: lua-markdown - Markdown module for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891436
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=82
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-mixlib-cli-1.2.2-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=82
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890828
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Math-Expression-Evaluator-0.3.2-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18
testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscrib
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890828
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890482
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
vimpal-1.1.0-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890482
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866012
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
Package non-daw-1.1.0-0.1.gitae6b78cf.fc17:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Updat
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891996
Bug 891996 depends on bug 891436, which changed state.
Bug 891436 Summary: Review Request: lua-markdown - Markdown module for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891436
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891436
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
lua-markdown-0.32-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
htt
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891438
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
openshift-origin-msg-common-1.0.3-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe fr
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891182
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
Seems like Isaac added the LICENSE file to the tarball without rising the
version number. Please redownload the source.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894881
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894881
--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Resolution: APPROVED
Thanks.
> I don't see any tests in the package, but please verify that upstream does
> not offer test cases elsewhere. If they do, they sh
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Fla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894609
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-OS.spec
SRPM URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-OS-2.6.0-4.fc19.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894608
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to latest upstream release.
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-SYMPHONY.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-SYMPHONY-5.4.6-1.fc19
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894606
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Couenne.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Couenne-0.4.3-4.fc
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sourada ---
Thanks for picking it up. I've added the BRs and removed (in prep section) the
bundled sqlite. This time to be sure I haven't missed any BRs I ran a scratch
build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.o
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894605
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Bonmin.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Bonmin-1.6.0-4.fc19
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894604
--- Comment #3 from Paulo Andrade ---
Sorry, also bad cut&paste, the changelog is:
- Update to latest upstream release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
http
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891199
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894604
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Ipopt.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-coin-or-Ipopt-3.10.3
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894603
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-FlopC++.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-FlopC++-1.1.2-4.fc
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894602
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Dip.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Dip-0.83.2-4.fc19.src.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894722
--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer ---
Package is almost good, just remove the spurious requires due to example,
and it should be good to be approved.
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicab
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894600
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to latest upstream release.
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-cppad.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-cppad-20130114-1.fc19
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894722
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894599
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-CoinMP.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-CoinMP-1.6.0-4.fc19
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894598
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-DyLP.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-DyLP-1.8.3-4.fc19.src
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894597
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to latest upstream release.
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Cbc.spec
SRPM URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Cbc-2.7.8-4.fc19.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865116
--- Comment #7 from Lukas Zapletal ---
Sorry for the delay.
"""
Um, there's little reason to include static libraries in -debuginfo packages,
as
static libraries always contain the needed symbols to get a backtrace, and are
(or a
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894596
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Blis.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Blis-0.93.3-4.fc19.sr
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894594
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Bcp.spec
SRPM URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Bcp-1.3.4-4.fc19.src.r
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894593
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Vol.spec
SRPM URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Vol-1.3.3-4.fc19.src.r
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894591
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Bcps.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Bcps-0.93.4-4.fc19.sr
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894727
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to run make check (#894610#c4).
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Alps.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Alps-1.4.2-4.fc19.src
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to latest upstream release.
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Cgl.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Cgl-0.57.4-1.fc19.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895226
Bug ID: 895226
Summary: python-django-grappelli
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895077
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894587
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to latest upstream release.
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Clp.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Clp-1.14.8-1.fc19.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798071
--- Comment #16 from Jon Chiappetta ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: fedora-arm-installer
Short Description: Allows an average user to easily install and create bootable
ARM software on SD card med
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798071
Jon Chiappetta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894338
--- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt ---
Then I'll silently wait for public activity/progress in this ticket and add my
comments.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586
--- Comment #2 from Paulo Andrade ---
Update:
- Update to latest upstream release.
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Osi.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-coin-or-Osi-0.105.7-1.fc19
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874980
--- Comment #13 from Alec Leamas ---
PS. I forgot 'fix %{optflags}' in the summary. I bet you didn't make the same
miss, but just in case... DS
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscr
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894338
--- Comment #11 from Ramon de C Valle ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> > Or maybe you're contradicting yourself or not being clear enough.
>
> Not at all. Eric will be able to explain it to you, because it is his review
> you misu
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894585
Paulo Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||894610
--- Comment #2 fr
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894610
Paulo Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||894585
--
You are recei
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874980
--- Comment #12 from Alec Leamas ---
Hi Ngo! Nice to hear from you (back from New Year celebrations?)
We have settled the first issue, the links.
As for the LICENSE, the fact that it's mentioned in the LICENSE file isn't
enough
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894338
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt ---
> Or maybe you're contradicting yourself or not being clear enough.
Not at all. Eric will be able to explain it to you, because it is his review
you misunderstood to begin with.
> "...i
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894338
--- Comment #9 from Ramon de C Valle ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > And even before I updated it, none of the resulting packages were empty.
>
> You still misunderstand it then.
Or maybe you're contradicting yourself or not bei
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894610
--- Comment #5 from Paulo Andrade ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> After consulting with Red Hat Legal, since these files only contain
> mathematical formulas, it is safe to treat them as being in the Public
> Domain.
>
> Mark this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895149
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter ---
For anyone curious, my (1) footnote was largely for Kevin's comment #1 which I
knew was coming. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from t
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188
--- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter ---
the -qt5 postfix stuff can mostly coexist with qtchooser, and i've been
brainstorming ideas on how to make it even less intrusive if needed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894338
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt ---
> And even before I updated it, none of the resulting packages were empty.
You still misunderstand it then.
> Just type "A".
Interactive builds are not acceptable.
> Can you enumerate
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894610
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #4 fr
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894338
--- Comment #7 from Ramon de C Valle ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> That can only be because you misunderstand Eric's review in comment 1 and my
> comment 2.
>
> More slowly then, okay. From comment 1, where fedora-review reporte
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891213
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846488
--- Comment #10 from Yannick Brosseau ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> A few things. You have the same file being owned my multiple packages.
>
> You only need to include the license file once if a package that it is
> provided by
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874980
--- Comment #11 from Minh Ngo ---
have removed static lib
have created a devel package
SPEC:
https://raw.github.com/Ignotus/fedora-packages/80fa8eb7ac1d5cfd75396b885652d07614563aec/chicken/chicken.spec
SRPM:
https://dl.dropbox.c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894338
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mschwe...@gmail.com
-
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894338
--- Comment #5 from Ramon de C Valle ---
I don't see any empty packages in your demo.
(In reply to comment #4)
> $ rpmls -p libdistorm-devel-3.3-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
> -rw-r--r-- /usr/include/distorm.h
> -rw-r--r-- /usr/include/m
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894881
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891215
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zZbU2X5Vwf&a=c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851805
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lWyih3wqD3&a=c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893200
--- Comment #2 from Erik Schilling ---
The issue with luabind is fixed now. New SRPM/Specfile with fixed new lua:
SRPM http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/valyriatear-0.5.0-0.2rc2.fc17.src.rpm
Specfile: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/valyr
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851805
Wolfgang Ulbrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comme
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785486
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||895184
|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895184
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895184
Bug ID: 895184
Summary: Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Text-Filter-Csstidy -
Horde Text Filter API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revie
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894338
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt ---
$ rpmls -p libdistorm-devel-3.3-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- /usr/include/distorm.h
-rw-r--r-- /usr/include/mnemonics.h
$ rpmls -p libdistorm-3.3-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874980
--- Comment #10 from Minh Ngo ---
What about licenses. Look in the LICENSE file.
Line 239 - GPL
Line 1 - BSD
Line 12 - Seems like MIT license
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubs
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874980
--- Comment #9 from Minh Ngo ---
Oh, I'm sorry, You have told about SRPM archive :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Q
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874980
--- Comment #8 from Minh Ngo ---
To Alec:
[ignotus@laptop chicken]$ wget
http://code.call-cc.org/stability/4.7.0/chicken-4.7.0.6.tar.gz
--2013-01-14 20:37:10--
http://code.call-cc.org/stability/4.7.0/chicken-4.7.0.6.tar.gz
Reso
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo