Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rjo...@redhat.com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886903
--- Comment #21 from Simone Caronni ---
The desktop file (/usr/share/applications/fedora-xonotic.desktop) has the
wrong icon icon, it is currently "nexuiz", it should be xonotic.
$ cat /usr/share/applications/fedora-xonotic.desk
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868578
Mathieu Bridon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boche...@fedoraproject.o
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891229
--- Comment #7 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
I think the best way is when packaging tobi, to create a nodejs-tobi-cookie
subpackage, that installs only the cookie portion of tobi as its own
"tobi-cookie" node module, in %{nodejs_sit
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891139
Mathieu Bridon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resoluti
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892433
Bug 892433 depends on bug 891139, which changed state.
Bug 891139 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IDN-Encode - Internationalizing
Domain Names in Applications (IDNA)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891139
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891868
Mathieu Bridon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resoluti
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891873
Bug 891873 depends on bug 891868, which changed state.
Bug 891868 Summary: Review Request: perl-Unicode-Stringprep - Preparation of
Internationalized Strings (RFC 3454)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891868
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902025
Scott Tsai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902025
--- Comment #9 from Scott Tsai ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > 3. The "prepare-tarball.sh" script mentioned in the spec file is no where to
> > found.
>
> I'm not sure if I understood you correct, is it enough to mention it here
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892423
Mathieu Bridon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resoluti
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892433
Bug 892433 depends on bug 892423, which changed state.
Bug 892423 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Export-Attrs - Perl 6 'is
export(...)' trait as a Perl 5 attribute
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892423
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892433
Bug 892433 depends on bug 891165, which changed state.
Bug 891165 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Routine - Composable units of
assertion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891165
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891165
Mathieu Bridon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resoluti
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834127
--- Comment #64 from Gary Gatling ---
I have verified that the VirtualGL.x86_64 and VirtualGL.i686 work correctly
from koji and fedora-updates-testing on fedora 18. The nature of my test,
glxgears from a 32 bit vm, required instal
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
If some file format is not recognized, I will report it upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redh
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt ---
> README
The more recent file format documentation from Adobe seems to be more complex
due to Photoshop >= 4.0:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet-apps/photoshop/fileformatashtml/
--
You are re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902025
--- Comment #8 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Spec URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/praiskup/public_git/pybugz.git/plain/pybugz.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/praiskup/public_git/pybugz.git/plain/pybugz-0.10-1.git89df2.fc17
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877817
--- Comment #1 from František Dvořák ---
Spec URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lbjp-common-gss-3.2.10-1/glite-lbjp-common-gss.spec
SRPM URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lbjp-common-gss-3.2.10-1/glite-lbjp-commo
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901729
David Lehman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: blivet -|Review Request:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891229
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok ---
You don't need to symlink tobi the standard way, all you need is to symlink
cookie form tobi to node_modules/request/vendor/cookie/
That would avoid the loop, right?
--
You are receiving thi
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
Bug ID: 902086
Summary: Review request: Elasticsearch
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: Package Review
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspec
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867282
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||867287
--
You are re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867287
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||867282
--- Comment #1
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896310
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt ---
> %global checkout_date 20130117
> Name: odeint
> Version:2.2.%{checkout_date}
> Release:1%{?dist}
It ought to apply the versioning scheme for snapshots.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882617
--- Comment #11 from Sébastien Willmann ---
Spec URL: http://wilqu.fedorapeople.org/reviews/jsoncpp/jsoncpp.spec
SRPM URL:
http://wilqu.fedorapeople.org/reviews/jsoncpp/jsoncpp-0.6.0-0.7.rc2.fc18.src.rpm
Actually, a library with
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159
--- Comment #19 from Volker Fröhlich ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> These seem to be all over the place too:
>
> /etc/zabbix/alertscripts
> /etc/zabbix/externalscripts
>
> /var/lib/zabbixsrv/alertscripts
> /var/lib/zabbixs
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902025
--- Comment #7 from Scott Tsai ---
For your convenience, I've collected all my suggested changes to your spec file
here: http://scottt.tw/fedora/pybugz.spec
Detailed review of the spec file:
1. Version naming (BIG one)
Per http:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889011
--- Comment #5 from Dan Allen ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/mojavelinux/rubygem-asciidoctor/master/rubygem-asciidoctor.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/mojavelinux/rubygem-asciidoctor/raw/master/srpms/rubygem-asciidoctor-0
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888958
--- Comment #12 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Why was this review not completed before approval ?
>
> For example, according to licensecheck, the license is wrong, and this is
> written in the review. And
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889011
Dan Allen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|asciidoc|asciidoctor
--
You are rece
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889011
Dan Allen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||asciidoc
--
You are receivi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851816
Wolfgang Ulbrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comme
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851816
--- Comment #4 from Wolfgang Ulbrich ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: fusion-icon
New Branches: f18
Owners: raveit65
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902025
Scott Tsai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|scottt...@gmail.com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851816
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902025
--- Comment #5 from Scott Tsai ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Hi Pavel,
Independent from this package review, you might want to take a look at this
pull request I just made: https://github.com/williamh/pybugz/pull/41
this allows th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888958
--- Comment #11 from Wolfgang Ulbrich ---
Mario,
can you include the the COPYING from upstream upsstream package
142331-solidity-0.4.1/source/gtk3/COPYING in your package?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888958
--- Comment #10 from Wolfgang Ulbrich ---
Oh, i forgot to post the lisence.text result.
GPL (v3 or later)
-
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/gtk-solidity-engine-0.4.1/source/gtk3/solid
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896310
Golo Fuchert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||packa...@golotop.de
--- C
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834127
--- Comment #63 from Andrej ---
I can confirm it's working now when I used yours RPMs for bbswitch, bumblebee
and bumblebee-nvidia. I can run on NVIDIA both, 32bits and 64bits.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902025
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Switched back to 'bugz'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jHqYDfCHyw&a=cc_unsub
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882617
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt ---
Debian's libjsoncpp_0.6.0~rc2-3.debian.tar.gz file
./patches/fix-SConstruct-soname.patch does set a soname:
$ grep soname fix-SConstruct-soname.patch
+env.Append( LINKFLAGS='-W
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902025
--- Comment #3 from Pavel Raiskup ---
I'm thinking about it again and it could really mislead users. I'll probably
switch it back to the name 'bugz'.
Pavel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902025
--- Comment #2 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Spec URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/praiskup/public_git/pybugz.git/plain/pybugz.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/praiskup/public_git/pybugz.git/plain/pybugz-0.10git69cd7-1.fc17.s
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902025
Scott Tsai changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||scottt...@gmail.com
--- Com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807821
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||ns
--
You are receivi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827649
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Blo
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902025
Bug ID: 902025
Summary: Review Request: pybugz - command line interface to
bugzilla
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771254
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assig
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024
Bug ID: 902024
Summary: Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for
the PSD file format
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877114
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiving thi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885043
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiving thi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017
Bug ID: 902017
Summary: Review Request: -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Reporter:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896033
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902006
Bug ID: 902006
Summary: Review Request: pylibpcap - A Python module for
libpcap
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852185
Jan Klepek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888958
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resol
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888958
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
--- Comm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resoluti
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887490
Kalpa Welivitigoda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895073
--- Comment #2 from Marcel Wysocki ---
Informed upstream.
Waiting for response.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Hbe2T
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887490
--- Comment #7 from Kalpa Welivitigoda ---
Thanks Mario
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JN0vrThJBS&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891244
--- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan ---
Here is the patch.
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/eio-remove-conflicts-1.patch
Now we can install libeio and eio side by side. The shared library provided by
eio is now
65 matches
Mail list logo
