Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903244
Bug 903244 depends on bug 896103, which changed state.
Bug 896103 Summary: Review Request: maven-shared-utils - Maven shared utility
classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896103
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896103
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896521
Bug 896521 depends on bug 896103, which changed state.
Bug 896103 Summary: Review Request: maven-shared-utils - Maven shared utility
classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896103
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890491
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891739
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891739
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
trac-CGit-plugin-1.0.5-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-CGit-plugin-1.0.5-1.fc17
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891739
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
trac-CGit-plugin-1.0.5-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-CGit-plugin-1.0.5-1.el6
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891739
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
trac-CGit-plugin-1.0.5-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-CGit-plugin-1.0.5-1.fc18
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896521
--- Comment #3 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com ---
FYI package doesn't build due to missing BRs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896521
--- Comment #4 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/reviews/maven-verifier/2/maven-verifier.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890491
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
thank you for the review. what are you using? it looks different than at
last the version of fedora-review I have been running. I would like to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890491
--- Comment #8 from Steven Roberts strob...@strobe.net ---
ah. unfortunate about fedora-review.
good catch on the defattr. one of my biggest stumbles has been finding all of
the old items I used to do in the RH7.3 days (which
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896011
--- Comment #4 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
You need to follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901496
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901496
Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510
--- Comment #46 from Taunus codezi...@suomi24.fi ---
The Gnome 3 components should be available from repositories and be system
wide.
Fixing the broken by default Gnome 3 by installing various plugins and
extensions from web
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901419
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856560
Tomasz Torcz zdzi...@irc.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ma...@juffo.org |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876928
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903624
Bug ID: 903624
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable - Automatically
give your module the ability to have plugins
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856560
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885348
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885350
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Requested package name ghc-data-cache doesn't match bug summary
ghc-date-cache, please fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895638
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901387
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901496
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Requested package name bochecha doesn't match bug summary
perl-Email-Received, please fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856560
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856560
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pg_journal-0.1.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pg_journal-0.1.1-2.fc18
--
You are receiving
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820659
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/python-ufc.spec
SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/python-ufc-2.0.5-0.3.fc19.src.rpm
%changelog
* Thu Jan 24 2013
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903664
Bug ID: 903664
Summary: Review Request: scriptaculous - JavaScript library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820659
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820659
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903624
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903683
Bug ID: 903683
Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS - Ameliorated interface
to the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820659
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820660
Bug 820660 depends on bug 820659, which changed state.
Bug 820659 Summary: Review Request: python-ufc - Unified Form-assembly Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820659
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821727
Bug 821727 depends on bug 820659, which changed state.
Bug 820659 Summary: Review Request: python-ufc - Unified Form-assembly Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820659
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895667
--- Comment #5 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
Major problem is that the package is not installable, because it requires
a no longer generated provides. I checked in fedora 18 all requires, and
only
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903701
Bug ID: 903701
Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message - Generic message
storing mechanism
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885038
--- Comment #14 from Christophe Burgun jo...@fedoraproject.org ---
Hi Antonio, Hi Michael,
Thanks for the feedback and sorry for the long delay i takke for answer
Note: Cannot find license.html in rpm(s)
This is a
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903624
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903683
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903713
Bug ID: 903713
Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple - Simplified
interface to Log::Message
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885350
Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885350
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896193
--- Comment #6 from Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com ---
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- No, that page is outdated, They removed GTK2 support in June of last
year(Changelog entry)
- Asking about this
- Will file a bug
- It is not
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855193
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|894926 |
---
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894926
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|855193 |
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894926
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894926
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837450
Bug 837450 depends on bug 894926, which changed state.
Bug 894926 Summary: Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation support
in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894926
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875692
Bug 875692 depends on bug 894926, which changed state.
Bug 894926 Summary: Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation support
in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894926
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903732
Bug ID: 903732
Summary: Review Request: python-collada - A python module for
creating, editing and loading COLLADA
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855193
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4899866
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903624
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895149
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|878188 (qt5-qtbase,qtbase) |
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903246
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Quickstart help:
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Python
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
*
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895149
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
That doesn't make this thing any better. It also goes against its stated
purpose (making the packaging more of a joke than anything else). And you still
didn't make a
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896019
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896019
--- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 686916
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=686916action=edit
php-pear-Text-CAPTCHA-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896019
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 686917
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=686917action=edit
phpci.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896019
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #18 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net ---
SPEC:
http://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/161/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/SPECS/AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
RPM:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895149
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
To sum up the discussion we just had on IRC:
Basically, what's the most inadequate about qtchooser is the concept that the
USER should pick his Qt version, as opposed to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903762
Bug ID: 903762
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-tobi-cookie - A cookie handling
and cookie jar library for Node.js
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903766
Bug ID: 903766
Summary: Review Request: php-PhpOption - Option type for PHP
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903767
Bug ID: 903767
Summary: Review Request: php-Metadata - Class/method/property
metadata management in PHP
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903768
Bug ID: 903768
Summary: Review Request: php-PhpCollection - General purpose
collection library for PHP
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903767
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903766
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903766
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903768
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891229
--- Comment #10 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Sorry, forgot to bump the release:
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-request.spec
SRPM:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903762
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891229
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732216
--- Comment #9 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
I can definitely provide a coffee-script-common package that provides what
rubygem-coffee-script needs without depending on node. The main coffee-script
package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903766
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895149
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
First off, for better or worse, fedora's policies do not require justification
for a package review. So, arguing against a package in it's review on this
basis, is...
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #19 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Okay, a src.rpm that can be built. Let's try to squash some of the issues:
%{_libdir}/%{name}/*
* Are you aware of the Mono Packaging Guidelines?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890839
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895149
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
First off, for better or worse, fedora's policies do not require justification
for a package review. So, arguing against a package in it's review on this
basis, is...
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895667
--- Comment #6 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Major problem is that the package is not installable, because it requires
a no longer generated provides. I checked in fedora 18 all requires, and
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890839
--- Comment #6 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Ugh, it won't build without the missing dep, even if I drop %check. If you can
produce an SRPM that builds I can review it, otherwise it'll have to wait for
the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885038
--- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Requires: boost,qt
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
No tests were found!!!
What about building with
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903824
Bug ID: 903824
Summary: Review Request: perl-Convert-Age - converts integer
seconds into a compact form and back
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903826
Bug ID: 903826
Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Domain-TLD - Work with TLD
names
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890833
Bug 890833 depends on bug 890828, which changed state.
Bug 890828 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Expression-Evaluator - Parses,
compiles and evaluates mathematics expressions
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890828
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890828
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Math-Expression-Evaluator-0.3.2-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903829
Bug ID: 903829
Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Interval - Convert seconds
to human readable form
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886104
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886104
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
plexus-component-factories-pom-1.0-0.3.alpha11.fc18 has been pushed to the
Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823343
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-net-ssh-multi-1.1-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823343
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888958
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package gtk-solidity-engine-0.4.1-3.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888958
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890828
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Math-Expression-Evaluator-0.3.2-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
sha-1.0.4b-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Bug 857639 depends on bug 859795, which changed state.
Bug 859795 Summary: Review Request: sha - File hashing utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
What|Removed |Added
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
