Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906160
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875150
Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894725
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732216
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732216
--- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
Ah, ok ... so I expect the uglify-js suffers the same issues as this package,
since there is already rubygem-uglifier, which carries its copy of uglify.js :/
Going to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894725
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901455
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901455
--- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
Ah, no ... Koji build failed as well ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906245
Bug ID: 906245
Summary: Review Request: marisa - static and spece-efficient
trie data structure library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906248
Bug ID: 906248
Summary: Review Request: libkkc - Japanese Kana Kanji
conversion library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611
--- Comment #24 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #20)
Please note, that I changed the packagename to vdr-vnsiserver3 which
included the VNSI protocol name, as stated by the package owners:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894725
--- Comment #5 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Same issues as for coffee-script package. Please provide this javasript
without dependency on Node.js. We need to use in
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906245
Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||906248
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906248
Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||906255
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901455
--- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Sorry, not sure what happened here. The above URLs are fixed.
I also kicked off a new koji scratch build. The original one failed because
there was a problem
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906255
Bug ID: 906255
Summary: Review Request: ibus-kkc - Japanese Kana Kanji input
method for ibus
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894725
--- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
How are you going to bootstrap the uglify-js? There is no preparation in any
its build time dependencies. I installed manually all its dependencies using
rpm --nodpes, but
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167
--- Comment #9 from HAT h...@fa2.so-net.ne.jp ---
You should post to netatalk's ML or site.
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netatalk-admins
http://sourceforge.net/p/netatalk/bugs/
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894725
--- Comment #7 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
Btw the build fails for me in %install section:
+ cp -pr bin lib package.json uglify-js.js
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/uglify-js-2.2.3-3.fc19.x86_64/usr/share/uglify-js/
cp:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894725
--- Comment #8 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #6)
How are you going to bootstrap the uglify-js? There is no preparation in any
its build time dependencies. I installed manually all its
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894725
--- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #6)
How are you going to bootstrap the uglify-js? There is no preparation in any
its build time dependencies. I installed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904843
--- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Oh, discussing Debian packaging practices is beyond the scope of a Fedora
package review request. ;)
I would also favour more relaxed Fedora packaging guidelines in a
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188
--- Comment #27 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
and the results are
s390
- the -O1 override is ineffective, the build system sets -O2 later on the
command line
g++ -c -pipe -O1 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||905396
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905389
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||905396
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905396
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866156
Bug 866156 depends on bug 866154, which changed state.
Bug 866154 Summary: Review Request: rtaudio - a realtime audio I/O library
(re-review orphaned package)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866154
What
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866154
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901419
--- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Ok, so I've looked at your new package and have some bad news for you :)
You're missing a BR, perl(Exporter) -- this is pulled in through use base on
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905742
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188
--- Comment #28 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
arm
- OOM in cc1plus same as on s390
my suggestion would be to patch out the -O3 #pragma for the low-memory arches
starting with %{arm} s390
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906362
Bug ID: 906362
Summary: Review Request: perl-qpid_proton - Perl language
bindings for Qpid Proton
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188
--- Comment #29 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
agreed, will do.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904911
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905742
François Cami f...@fcami.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905742
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904911
--- Comment #4 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
Susi, I have spoken to Greg, he is going to make an new bug submission. He is
upstream.
All the headers seem to be BSD, there license file seems to be derivative of
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904911
--- Comment #5 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
(In reply to comment #4)
All the headers seem to be BSD, there license file seems to be derivative of
BSD. Can you guys check to make sure?
Let's wait for spot. This
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188
--- Comment #30 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtbase.spec
SRPM URL:
Description:
http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtbase-5.0.1-1.fc18.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904911
--- Comment #6 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
Ok cool.
Another comment, their license looks FOSS to me, so I am unsure of the FE-LEGAL
block. Maybe it could be considered under Good licenses
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906362
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188
--- Comment #31 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Wrt bundled harfbuzz,
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2013-January/009637.html
It appears that qt (4 and 5) both bundle the older non-system-provided
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906411
Bug ID: 906411
Summary: Review Request: mup - a music notation and printing
program
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906411
Greg Bailey gbai...@lxpro.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904911
--- Comment #7 from Greg Bailey gbai...@lxpro.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Greg: please don't hijack other people's review requests. Comments #2 and #3
might lead one to believe you are the submitter.
Apologies for any
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904911
--- Comment #8 from Greg Bailey gbai...@lxpro.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Susi, I have spoken to Greg, he is going to make an new bug submission. He
is upstream.
I've submitted BZ #906411.
FYI, Brendan, I'm not
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906362
--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
I don't see the perl bindings listed on http://qpid.apache.org/proton/ and your
Source isn't a URL. Where does this come from? There's no explanation in the
spec file...
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885409
--- Comment #8 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Would rather not split the package at this time.
Ok.
Will remove those commands
from the spec after import.
Ok.
Please let me know
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885409
--- Comment #9 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
Also your build requires are bloated, why do you need BuildRequires: gtk2-devel
when BuildRequires: pygtk2-devel drags it in.
repoquery --requires pygtk2-devel
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904911
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906442
Bug ID: 906442
Summary: Review Request: gimp-normalmap - Plugin that enabled
the creation of normal maps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906443
Bug ID: 906443
Summary: Review Request: tupi - 2D vector-based animation
environment
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901872
Michael J Gruber m...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904843
--- Comment #15 from Al Stone a...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Oh, discussing Debian packaging practices is beyond the scope of a Fedora
package review request. ;)
Agreed :-).
[...]
Version: 5.0
You may
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906453
Bug ID: 906453
Summary: Review Request: bsfilter - Bayesian spam filter
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771254
--- Comment #13 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Okay, thank you for response.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611
--- Comment #25 from Till Bubeck t.bub...@reinform.de ---
Here we go. Please find an updated version at
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bubeck/vdr-vnsiserver3.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906245
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904911
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906411
--- Comment #1 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
*** Bug 904911 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906473
Bug ID: 906473
Summary: Review Request: erlang-ranch - Socket acceptor pool
for TCP protocols
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906453
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
Bug ID: 906481
Summary: Review Request: erlang-cowboy - Small, fast, modular
HTTP server written in Erlang
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906482
Bug ID: 906482
Summary: Review Request: erlang-mimetypes - Erlang MIME types
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906411
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906486
Bug ID: 906486
Summary: Review Request: erlang-parsexml - Simple DOM XML
parser with convenient and very simple API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906245
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
some fixes are needed
1) This BR is not needed: gcc-c++
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
its already installed as minimal build
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906362
--- Comment #3 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I don't see the perl bindings listed on http://qpid.apache.org/proton/ and
your Source isn't a URL. Where does this come from? There's no
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611
--- Comment #26 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com ---
I think it's OK now :)
This package is APPROVED!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611
Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906442
Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906443
Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611
--- Comment #27 from Till Bubeck t.bub...@reinform.de ---
Mohamed, thanks for all your work. I've been going through a number of reviews
in the past. But your review was very good and very detailled. Thanks a lot!
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611
Till Bubeck t.bub...@reinform.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877694
--- Comment #3 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org ---
This review is stalled on the submitter in accordance with the stalled package
review policy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
Submitter,
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611
--- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Requested package name vdr-vnsiserver3 doesn't match bug summary
vdr-vnsiserver, please correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906442
Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867368
--- Comment #15 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
There are some important fixes in upstream, plus minor issue - pdf file in
devel subpackage differs between builds (i686 vs x86_64) - moved to doc
subpackage.
The new
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903824
--- Comment #11 from Normunds l...@rule.lv ---
Package updated (Macro in MODULE_COMPATm, re-checked dependencies according to
Requires and BuildRequires practices discussed here, removed e-mail from
changelog).
New Package SCM
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903824
Normunds l...@rule.lv changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903824
--- Comment #12 from Normunds l...@rule.lv ---
Incorrect brances in previous request. Corrected here.
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Convert-Age
Short Description: Perl module that converts
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903826
Normunds l...@rule.lv changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903829
--- Comment #8 from Normunds l...@rule.lv ---
Package updated, license is now included in upstream, other requested changes
done.
Spec URL: http://unibackup.rule.lv/FedoraRPM/perl-Time-Interval.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904328
--- Comment #7 from Normunds l...@rule.lv ---
Moved Data::Dumper to Requires, removed macro. Please check.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867368
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
canl-c-2.0.7-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/canl-c-2.0.7-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867368
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
canl-c-2.0.7-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/canl-c-2.0.7-1.el6
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904843
--- Comment #16 from Al Stone a...@redhat.com ---
Updated versions now available.
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~ahs3/acpica-tools.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~ahs3/acpica-tools-20130117-5.fc18.src.rpm
Thanks
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906442
Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901872
--- Comment #10 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com
---
(In reply to comment #9)
Many thanks for the review!
So, you're good to go provided you add one minor item so that the compiler
flags are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901365
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901365
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-mongoengine-0.7.9-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mongoengine-0.7.9-4.fc18
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896310
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com ---
Hello!
New spec/srpm:
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/odeint/odeint.spec
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/odeint/odeint-2.2-1.fc19.src.rpm
* Sun Jan
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906245
--- Comment #2 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com ---
Thanks, addressed the issues.
Spec URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/marisa/marisa.spec
SRPM URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/marisa/marisa-0.2.1-2.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894725
--- Comment #10 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Sorry, I was getting tired when I was working on this yesterday. This now
builds fine for sure and the %check stuff is conditionalized.
Spec:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904798
--- Comment #8 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Resolution: NEEDS WORK
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901365
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-mongoengine-0.7.9-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mongoengine-0.7.9-4.fc17
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906245
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906245
Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906248
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611
Till Bubeck t.bub...@reinform.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
