Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903701
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Waiting on unblocking package https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5471.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884674
--- Comment #8 from Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com ---
Changed git-repo name:
https://github.com/F1ash/kde-plasma-alsa-volume
SPEC:
https://raw.github.com/F1ash/kde-plasma-alsa-volume/master/kde-plasma-alsa-volume.spec
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841483
--- Comment #21 from Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com ---
Changed git-repo name: https://github.com/F1ash/kde-plasma-mail-checker
SPEC:
https://raw.github.com/F1ash/kde-plasma-mail-checker/simple/kde-plasma-mail-checker.spec
NB:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908249
--- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Hmm, you are right that the license is incorrect, but it should be LGPLv3,
not LGPLv3+, afaics - according to [1]:
... the terms of the GNU
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903701
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894665
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908249
--- Comment #6 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
Fixed:
SPEC: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/jnr-enxio/jnr-enxio.spec
SRPM:
http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/jnr-enxio/jnr-enxio-0.3-2.fc18.src.rpm
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894665
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894665
--- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Oops, wrong file copy and pasted as some [x]s are missing. Pasted again below.
(Review remains approved.)
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894661
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894661
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908788
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901454
--- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Oh false alarm... looks like you already did that but you only updated the SPEC
not the SRPM.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901454
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905848
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901455
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901455
--- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Upstream have committed a change to package.json and added a LICENSE file:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863836
Pavel Šimerda psime...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908249
--- Comment #7 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908249
--- Comment #8 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
Fixed (documentation of the licensing stuff):
SPEC: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/jnr-enxio/jnr-enxio.spec
SRPM:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908493
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Eduardo, thank you for your remark.
SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-django-discover-runner.spec
SRPM:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
--- Comment #10 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
Hello, sorry for being late, I've been quite busy.
Before I proceed with the review, I would like to have a couple of things fixed
on top of those:
1) Please format
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891952
--- Comment #24 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
$ rpmls -p perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-3.18-3.fc19.noarch.rpm|grep -i parse
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/man/man3/ExtUtils::ParseXS::Constants.3pm.gz
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891952
--- Comment #25 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
This is OK.
What is okay? In case you refer to file conflicts, I do not.
I still wonder _why_ the tests are deleted? Especially since some of the tests
are about
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909144
Bug ID: 909144
Summary: Review Request: perl-File-CheckTree - Run many
file-test checks on a tree
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
--- Comment #11 from Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lur...@redhat.com ---
spec/srpm updated:
- http://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/gcab.spec
- http://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/gcab-0.3-2.fc18.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #10)
I would be
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891952
--- Comment #26 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #25)
Especially since some of the
tests are about modules included in the package.
If so, that was a mistake. Anyway, now it should be fixed.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #4 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909194
Bug ID: 909194
Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd - Finding and running
system commands made easy
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785457
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785446
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785468
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785476
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891183
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908788
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
--- Comment #12 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785444
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
--- Comment #13 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
Easy issues, after fixing these for me the package is good to go:
===
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: If
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908920
--- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4938450
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896193
Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|psyb...@gmail.com |
---
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895536
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com ---
- Removed bundled JAR
- Building the new way
Spec URL:
http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/reviews/maven-repository-builder/0.2.alpha2/maven-repository-builder.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
--- Comment #14 from Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lur...@redhat.com ---
spec/srpm updated:
- http://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/gcab.spec
- http://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/gcab-0.3-3.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896521
--- Comment #7 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: maven-verifier
Short Description: Maven verifier
Owners: tradej sochotni mizdebsk msrb
Branches: f18
InitialCC:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896521
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lur...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896521
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908920
Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
--- Comment #18 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
All the tags that you added to the spec file were also for el5, otherwise they
were not needed :)
If you can add the branch for el5 I can build it.
Thanks,
--Simone
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906248
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908788
--- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908788
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908788
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Perl-Stripper-0.04-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl-Stripper-0.04-1.fc18
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908788
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Perl-Stripper-0.04-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl-Stripper-0.04-1.fc17
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gcab-0.3-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcab-0.3-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896011
Bug 896011 depends on bug 895757, which changed state.
Bug 895757 Summary: Review Request: gcab - GObject Cabinet library and tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757
Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lur...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908249
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905024
--- Comment #2 from Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
ISSUES:
---
(1): Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905024
--- Comment #3 from Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com ---
Updated spec and srpm:
http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/bind10/bind10.spec
http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/bind10/bind10-1.0.0-0.2.beta.fc18.src.rpm
I also renamed original specfile
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909387
Bug ID: 909387
Summary: Review Request: c++-gtk-utils - A library for GTK+
programming with C++
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909387
Frederik Holden frederik+fed...@frh.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886903
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Addressed the above, left opengl-games-utils in place, haven't dealt with
d0_blind yet. I can't use the paths above, as I'm not installing it. It can't
find all the static
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886908
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Addressed all the above, yes, this is intended for EPEL.
SPEC: http://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/xonotic/xonotic-data.spec
SRPM:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908114
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882619
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882619
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
steadyflow-0.2.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908114
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894558
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ghc-byteorder-1.0.3-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894558
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785494
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785494
--- Comment #9 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Created attachment 695183
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=695183action=edit
php-horde-Horde-Compress-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785494
--- Comment #10 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
use php-common instead of php(language) for now
except if you plan to differ EPEL-6 import until 6.4 release
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906255
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #692300|0
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908920
Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908920
Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906255
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852185
Xose Vazquez Perez xose.vazq...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884674
--- Comment #9 from Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com ---
fresh build:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9498/4939498/kde-plasma-alsa-volume-0.41.2-1.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905615
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909471
Bug ID: 909471
Summary: Review Request:
rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-remote-user - OpenShift
plugin for remote-user authentication
Product: Fedora
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909471
--- Comment #1 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com ---
rpmlint output:
rpmlint rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-remote-user.spec
rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-remote-user-1.4.3-1.fc18.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot}
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909485
Bug ID: 909485
Summary: Review Request: memstomp - checker for passing
overlapping memory arguments to mem* and str*
functions
Product: Fedora
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858068
--- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.openftd.org/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend/mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891952
--- Comment #27 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #24)
(In reply to comment #19)
$ rpmls -p perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-3.18-3.fc19.noarch.rpm|grep -i parse
-rw-r--r--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901455
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901455
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901454
--- Comment #4 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Sorry about that. I've synced the two and fixed a minor bug in the original
spec file.
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-source-map.spec
SRPM:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894661
--- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: nodejs-buffer-equal
Short Description: Returns whether two buffers are equal
Owners: patches
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894665
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894661
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894661
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901454
--- Comment #6 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Damn it false alarm again, browser cache had the old version!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901454
--- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
I think the Name tag be nodejs-source-map not source-map?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886903
--- Comment #23 from Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@googlemail.com ---
For icons:
http://git.xonotic.org/?p=xonotic/xonotic.git;a=tree;f=misc/logos;h=026e78814052e73367e96aaa301c88a247c9eecd;hb=HEAD;js=1
--
You are receiving
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901455
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877651
Bug 877651 depends on bug 905420, which changed state.
Bug 905420 Summary: RFE: Correct ppl-%{_arch}.hh definition conflicts with
gmpxx.h definition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905420
What|Removed
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
