Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890769
--- Comment #7 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no ---
Hi!
Any progress?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871511
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871511
Juan Orti Alcaine j.orti.alca...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871511
Juan Orti Alcaine j.orti.alca...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913152
--- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande trp...@katamail.com ---
(In reply to comment #6)
[...]
MUMPS.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsmumps-4.10.0.so /lib64/libquadmath.so.0
4 packages and 0
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913296
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Thanks for your comments. It's interesting because when you approved salt, i
didn't have python?-devel as a BR. I'll make sure to add it in
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912878
--- Comment #4 from gray...@archlinux.us ---
I updated the upstream code and refreshed the respective files for review:
Spec URL: http://repo-ck.com/fedora_rpms/profile-sync-daemon.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
--- Comment #5 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Well, ruby is under the following license :
License : (Ruby or BSD) and Public Domain
So I do not see where does the GPL v2 come from, as http-access was first
without
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
--- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: If the package is under
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896101
--- Comment #13 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
- this part seems rather suspicious :
%doc COPYING README
%files -f %{name}.lang
shouldn't be in another order ?
It doesn't seems to work fine :
$ rpm -qpl
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893866
--- Comment #15 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
You don't need %check for Fedora. FYI
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893866
--- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #15)
You don't need %check for Fedora. FYI
You don't need it but if the package supports it you should use it and I've
found it picks up a lot of
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914924
Bug ID: 914924
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-oauth - Library for interacting
with OAuth 1.0, 1.0A, 2 and Echo
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914923
Bug ID: 914923
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-oauth - Library for interacting
with OAuth 1.0, 1.0A, 2 and Echo
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914925
Bug ID: 914925
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-passport - Simple, unobtrusive
authentication for Node.js
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893866
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|dan.mas...@gmail.com|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914926
Bug ID: 914926
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-passport-oauth - OAuth 1.0 and
2.0 authentication strategies for Passport
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914926
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||914924,
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914925
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||914926
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914924
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||914926
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893866
--- Comment #18 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Jon,
Please host this on your fedora people account instead of dropox for the time
being.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914923
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914924
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu ---
*** Bug 914923 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678809
Sébastien Willmann sebastien.willm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882617
Sébastien Willmann sebastien.willm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678809
Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912099
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||912102
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912102
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894524
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||908116
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908116
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #23 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net ---
Hello? Any Help would be good?!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908116
--- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
A few ( for now ) remarks :
- Provides: openshift-origin-console = %{version}
I think you mean :
Provides: openshift-console = %{version}
( as this would solve
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908116
--- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Mhh, in fact, i am not sure now, what is the use of /var/www/.openshift/api.yml
?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908116
--- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Also, why make the code owned by apache, since this mean the console can erase
its own code, which is usually bad from a security point of view. I would
recommend to run it
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914936
Bug ID: 914936
Summary: Review Request: fes - Fast Exhaustive Search
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914937
Bug ID: 914937
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-sphericalmercator -
Transformations between Spherical Mercator and Lat/Lon
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906453
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914941
Bug ID: 914941
Summary: Review Request: plasmate - IDE taylored for
development of Plasma components
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914941
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||907993
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914941
--- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5047088
rpmlint *rpm x86_64/*.rpm
plasmate.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-0.2.beta1
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913152
--- Comment #8 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
I think the command line is somewhat messed, and
should add linker (-Wl) commands before objects, but
the -Wl,soname... last in the command line. Order
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811330
Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910235
--- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
New upstream release includes docs, readme, license, and tests.
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-pygeoip.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894524
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913152
--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande trp...@katamail.com ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I think the command line is somewhat messed, and
should add linker (-Wl) commands before objects, but
the -Wl,soname... last in the command
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913152
--- Comment #10 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com
---
(In reply to comment #9)
At this point, I'm blocked by my knowledges which are limited in this field.
You think I had to study for a long time how
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893866
--- Comment #19 from Jon Disnard jdisn...@gmail.com ---
Will make sure to test x86 going forward.
The LICENSE file is a standard 3-clause BSD license.
That is why the SPEC files has BSD for the license type.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913325
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910485
nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871511
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852185
--- Comment #12 from Xose Vazquez Perez xose.vazq...@gmail.com ---
is this bug alive ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908389
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908389
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 701757
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=701757action=edit
php-horde-Horde-Text-Filter-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908389
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 701758
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=701758action=edit
phpci.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908389
--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Headers and COPYING explicit use LGPL v2.1 (without any later option)
So, LGPLv2 (not
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877651
--- Comment #49 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com
---
Update:
- Update to sagemath 5.7.
- Add conditional patch for libgap.
- Add conditional patch for fes.
- Remove with_sage_ipython conditional.
- Add
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904862
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904862
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-EasyRdf-0.7.2-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909588
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909588
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 701761
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=701761action=edit
php-horde-Horde-Tree-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909588
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 701762
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=701762action=edit
phpci.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909588
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828993
Benedikt Schäfer ib54...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909659
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909659
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 701769
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=701769action=edit
php-horde-Horde-Injector-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909659
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909659
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 701770
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=701770action=edit
phpci.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914988
Bug ID: 914988
Summary: Review Request: php-SymfonyCmfRouting - Extends the
Symfony2 routing component for dynamic routes and
chaining several routers
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914988
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909662
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909706
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909706
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 701782
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=701782action=edit
php-horde-Horde-Vfs-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909706
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 701783
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=701783action=edit
phpci.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909706
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912833
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907007
--- Comment #3 from François Cami f...@fcami.net ---
Thank you Luke.
I've changed the package name and added a unittest++.pc file generated from a
template. Please let me know what you think.
Spec URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907007
François Cami f...@fcami.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914996
Bug ID: 914996
Summary: Review Request: gitstats - Generates statistics based
on GIT repository activity
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914996
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Gordon sgor...@redhat.com ---
$ rpmlint gitstats.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint gitstats-0.1-20130223gitaa77a89.fc18.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914996
--- Comment #2 from Stephen Gordon sgor...@redhat.com ---
NB: When reviewing the sources to determine the license I found that while the
documentation files shipped by upstream list GPLv2 and GPLv3 one of the files
is licensed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914996
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Gordon sgor...@redhat.com ---
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5048859
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #4 from Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
--- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
OK, so here's my first dumb support question: according to the docs, opendmarc
does not itself do DKIM or SPF evaluation -
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893165
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893165
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mod_qos-10.13-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_qos-10.13-4.fc18
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893165
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mod_qos-10.13-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_qos-10.13-4.el6
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814458
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814458
--- Comment #11 from Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com ---
I'm still willing to finish reviewing this package. Tim, are you still willing
to maintain this package, or should someone else take it over?
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188
--- Comment #35 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtbase.spec
SRPM URL:
Description:
http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtbase-5.0.1-3.fc18.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915005
Bug ID: 915005
Summary: Review Request: qt5-qttools - Qt5 - QtTool components
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||915005
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915005
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915006
Bug ID: 915006
Summary: Review Request: qt5-qtwebkit - Qt5 - QtWebKit
components
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||915006
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915006
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915009
Bug ID: 915009
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-pcap - Ruby interface to
LBL Packet Capture library.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915009
--- Comment #1 from Sam Kottler skott...@redhat.com ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5049110
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909713
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909907
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
