Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918578
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873736
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Fix License:
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/0689c766e9e23c4e972d9d55985eda2fdf19ab38
Spec:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918508
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918546
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907261
Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903683
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Waiting on unblocking this package
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5522.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
Bug 858841 depends on bug 858946, which changed state.
Bug 858946 Summary: selinux blocks write access on /etc/owncloud
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858946
What|Removed |Added
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888301
--- Comment #25 from Sebastien Jodogne s.jodo...@gmail.com ---
Hi Mario,
The approval of jsoncpp is a great new! I will of course notify Sebastien
Willmann of any problem I can detect with the jsoncpp package.
Unfortunately, as
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912930
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Ooops, sorry, this took so long.
Eduardo, please move header files to a sub package:
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: icaro :
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781260
--- Comment #35 from Minh Ngo nlmin...@gmail.com ---
Please unretired f17 f18 branches
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781260
Minh Ngo nlmin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918129
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Ruzicka jruzi...@redhat.com ---
I've contacted upstream with request to update gpl.txt.
If it gets done, I'll also update the .spec according to your comments
(changelog version and remove unneeded
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916665
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Mlcoch tmlc...@redhat.com ---
Hi Michael,
thank you for review.
Fixed version:
Spec URL: http://tmlcoch.fedorapeople.org/librepo.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907261
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/poly2tri.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/poly2tri-0.0-2.20120407hgacf81f1f1764.fc18.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918612
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918612
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918612
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874980
--- Comment #17 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Ping?! This goes real slow... is it that you don't really have time for this,
or is it something in the remarks which causes difficulties?
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904843
--- Comment #19 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
the other compiler option flags should be honoured
(via %{optflags}) such as -g
Agreed. I had asked about filtering out -O2, since not all of %optflags
is
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883501
Ngo Than t...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882617
Andrey Ponomarenko andrei.mos...@mail.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781260
--- Comment #36 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
This requires a re-review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883501
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916023
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918508
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918546
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918612
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893866
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918612
--- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Thank you both.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919044
Bug ID: 919044
Summary: Review Request: screengrab - Qt-based screen grabber
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919044
Eugene A. Pivnev ti.eug...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819919
--- Comment #7 from Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org ---
I'm not unresponsive any more. I had no internet for several months.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874980
Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913130
Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918612
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918612
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-HTML-Element-Extended-1.18-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883104
--- Comment #5 from Lorenzo Dalrio lorenzo.dal...@gmail.com ---
Hi Paul,
there is only one major issue left with your package: you are using both
%{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT style macros, this should not be done. [1]
You can
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913130
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906482
Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819919
--- Comment #8 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Ah... what a pity! But I guess that for you, being without internet caused a
lot more trouble than this :)
Anyway, I closed this bug (using the formal procedure for that)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873736
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873736
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912834
--- Comment #12 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Sorry, another must:
[MUST] Add missing group -- Group: Development/Libraries
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918508
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918508
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-horde-Horde-Compress-Fast-1.0.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 6.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918508
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-horde-Horde-Compress-Fast-1.0.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874980
--- Comment #19 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Which is nice, thanks. Still, this bug (874980) is submitted by Minh Ngo, and
he's the one which eventually need to submit the package.
That said, it might be that Minh
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785312
Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873736
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918129
--- Comment #11 from Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
- a - (dash) is missing between .com and 1.0
It can be with or without dash between email and V-R:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906482
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
Hello!
(In reply to comment #1)
Hi,
the main issue here is with the license I think.
On the upstream github pages there is no clear info what license applies (at
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918546
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918546
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-horde-Horde-Queue-1.0.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-horde-Horde-Queue-1.0.0-1.el6
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918546
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-horde-Horde-Queue-1.0.0-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-horde-Horde-Queue-1.0.0-1.fc18
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912834
--- Comment #13 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de ---
Spec URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-dropbox-php-Dropbox.spec
SRPM URL:
http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-dropbox-php-Dropbox-1.0.0-4.fc17.src.rpm
(In reply to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916665
Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916665
Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919077
Bug ID: 919077
Summary: Review Request: perl-List-AllUtils - Combines
List::Util and List::MoreUtils
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873736
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873736
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-horde-Horde-Memcache-2.0.2-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873736
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-horde-Horde-Memcache-2.0.2-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888301
--- Comment #26 from Mario Ceresa mrcer...@gmail.com ---
Hi Sebastien,
thanks for you mail. I think that just promptly communicating with jsoncpp
maintainers will be sufficient. Also Andrey posted a nice link which helps a
lot in
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918630
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882617
--- Comment #19 from Mario Ceresa mrcer...@gmail.com ---
Hello Michael, Sebastien and Andrey,
Thanks for your hard work and contributions to this package. I'm very happy
that jsoncpp was finally approved, even if the lack of
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785312
Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919091
Bug ID: 919091
Summary: Review Request: perl-L - Perl extension to load module
automatically in one-liner
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919094
Bug ID: 919094
Summary: Review Request: perl-App-p - Steroids for your perl
one-liners
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916665
Tomas Mlcoch tmlc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918578
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||919094
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919094
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||919091,
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918639
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||919094
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919077
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||919094
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919091
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||919094
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916405
--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
From my recent tests, you're right, it seems to work.
Probably a very old bug which is fix now...
Mind if I ping the devel list?
Of course, you can.
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918630
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919100
Bug ID: 919100
Summary: Review Request: crudini - A utility for manipulating
ini files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912834
--- Comment #14 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #12)
Sorry, another must:
[MUST] Add missing group -- Group: Development/Libraries
No, this is purely
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919044
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918630
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907261
--- Comment #4 from Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch ---
Hi,
[OK] Preserve AUTHORS timestamp
[OK] Use %%{optflags}
[--] Add a comment about Makefile
I would still put the Makefile somewhere reachable (the same
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918129
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Ruzicka jruzi...@redhat.com ---
Upstream responded and is going to fix. As soon as it happens, I'll post the
new version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919110
Bug ID: 919110
Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Float - Details of the
floating point data type
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832670
--- Comment #12 from Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com ---
Fine with me, I don't know how I do that though?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907261
--- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Versioning the soname on your own can be a problem if upstream decides to do
the same one day. I suggest mentioning this topic on #fedora-devel or the devel
mailing list.
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832670
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832670
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916665
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918630
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919100
Antonio Trande trp...@katamail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914752
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com ---
Only complaint from fedora-review is
[!]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
Note: %define libiscsi_includedir %{_includedir}/iscsi %define
libiscsi_libdir
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907261
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
[--] Add a comment about Makefile
I would still put the Makefile somewhere reachable (the same Github area
where you put the spec, perhaps?)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918129
--- Comment #13 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Upstream responded and is going to fix. As soon as it happens, I'll post the
new version.
Great to hear!
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918639
Bug 918639 depends on bug 918630, which changed state.
Bug 918630 Summary: Review Request: perl-lib-abs - Module lib that makes
relative path absolute to caller
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918630
What
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918630
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919044
Antonio Trande trp...@katamail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919044
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
- License should be a GPLv2.
What makes you say that? Looking at the source files, I see a mixture of BSD
and GPLv2+ , which do effectively combine to GPLv2+
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914752
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com ---
Fixed these:
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[ ]: Package has no %clean
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919044
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande trp...@katamail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
- License should be a GPLv2.
What makes you say that? Looking at the source files, I see a mixture of
BSD and GPLv2+ , which do
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906482
--- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
Licensing status clarified:
* https://github.com/spawngrid/mimetypes/issues/11
* https://github.com/spawngrid/mimetypes/pull/12
Also ensured that we're using system-wide
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749291
Ricardo Rocha rocha.po...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
