Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947861
Fabian Deutsch fdeut...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928061
--- Comment #13 from Nikita Klimov n...@jaur.su ---
(In reply to comment #12)
(In reply to comment #10)
I noted a 'fedora-review' error with your package. I think it is tied to %
into Url in .spec file. Changing to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948105
--- Comment #6 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
For -2:
* Requires etc
- On F-19+, rubygem-based rpm must have Requires: ruby(release)
and On F-18-, rubygem-based rpm must have Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.9.1.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947455
--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
Upstream update:
http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Module-Build-Tiny/perl-Module-Build-Tiny-0.014-1.fc20.src.rpm
Spec URL unchanged.
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923564
--- Comment #39 from Dan Fruehauf malko...@gmail.com ---
It's divided now to sub-packages:
Spec URL: http://nm-ssh.cloudapp.net/nm-sub-packages/NetworkManager-ssh.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910146
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923564
--- Comment #40 from Pavel Šimerda psime...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #39)
It's divided now to sub-packages:
Spec URL: http://nm-ssh.cloudapp.net/nm-sub-packages/NetworkManager-ssh.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|New Review Request: |Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911042
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Do you really need to ship the benchmark stuff in the package?
Nope! Removed:
Spec URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927879
--- Comment #1 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
Fixed the build system, and updated to release 1166.
http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jspecview.spec
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928061
--- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Patching the address hasn't been asked for. There is a reason for that:
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address
*
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928061
--- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Oh, if just setup.py contained a wrong address, that's okay to patch but not
necessary either. It's okay to wait for the next release.
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948753
Bug ID: 948753
Summary: Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Oauth - Horde OAuth
client/server
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948753
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922460
--- Comment #4 from Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com ---
Two minor issues noted below.
The first is a non-blocker, but SHOULD item.
For the second, can you provide some feedback on the rpmlint warnings, for
reference?
After that,
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798438
Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948105
--- Comment #7 from Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com ---
New SRPM:
http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-ronn/rubygem-ronn-0.7.3-3.fc19.src.rpm
New Spec:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948757
Bug ID: 948757
Summary: Review Request: python-whoosh - Fast, pure-Python
full text indexing, search, and spell checking
library
Product: Fedora
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948757
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929214
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929214
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948275
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892625
--- Comment #13 from Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au ---
I tried the configure option --disable-rpath, it is not supported, it appears
to be a custom option.
Therefore, I've implemented the hack with sed:
sed -i
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948275
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908594
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948275
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948275
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-phpunit-Version-1.0.0-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpunit-Version-1.0.0-1.fc18
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948275
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-phpunit-Version-1.0.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpunit-Version-1.0.0-1.el6
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #2 from Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Does it really need ncurses/readline headers? I couldn't find any
ncurses/readline includes in the js header files, at least.
Looks like it has
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948855
Bug ID: 948855
Summary: Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long - Extended processing
of command line options
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929214
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929214
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-pear-Net-IMAP-1.1.2-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Net-IMAP-1.1.2-2.fc18
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929214
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-pear-Net-IMAP-1.1.2-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Net-IMAP-1.1.2-2.el5
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929214
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-pear-Net-IMAP-1.1.2-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Net-IMAP-1.1.2-2.el6
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
Does it really need ncurses/readline headers? I couldn't find any
ncurses/readline includes in the js header files, at least.
Just to clarify, I wasn't talking about
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916676
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948974
Bug ID: 948974
Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext - Framework for
localization
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
--- Comment #14 from Jerome Glisse jgli...@redhat.com ---
Updated spec and srpm:
http://fedorapeople.org/~glisse/glamor/xorg-x11-glamor.spec
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
--- Comment #15 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com ---
The src.rpm link points to the previous version. I see the correct link works:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928061
--- Comment #16 from Nikita Klimov n...@jaur.su ---
Hi Michael, thanks for review.
In my opinion will be better to wait while developer fix it, so I rolled back
package to previous version.
Spec URL: http://jaur.su/nagstamon.spec
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
--- Comment #17 from Jerome Glisse jgli...@redhat.com ---
I don't see any issue left ? Is there something specific that bother you ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948661
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919442
--- Comment #5 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com ---
Indeed. Addressed both those issues in -3 (along with fixing the samtools
patch):
New SPEC: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/R-Rsamtools.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927310
--- Comment #5 from john5342 john5...@gmail.com ---
Just a note that this package has already been submitted for review at [1]. You
really should check before submitting a review request (it is in the review
request guidelines).
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #4 from Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Does it really need ncurses/readline headers? I couldn't find any
ncurses/readline includes in the js header files, at least.
Just to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888301
--- Comment #32 from Sebastien Jodogne s.jodo...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: orthanc
Short Description: RESTful DICOM server for healthcare and medical research
Owners: sjodogne
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927310
--- Comment #6 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com ---
You are correct.
I usually do, and thought that I did. But there was 4 or 5 packages I was
checking in Koji and then in the review requests, and I must have missed this
in
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928061
--- Comment #17 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Hi Michael, thanks for review.
In my opinion will be better to wait while developer fix it, so I rolled
back package to previous
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948664
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927310
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
That's a surprise. It's not displayed on the pages at
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ but only when using the Quick
Review Search box.
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888301
Sebastien Jodogne s.jodo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927310
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909662
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908329
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949038
Bug ID: 949038
Summary: Review Request: php-horde-horde - Horde Application
Framework
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949038
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874677
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949038
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920309
Rob Clark rcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928061
--- Comment #18 from Nikita Klimov n...@jaur.su ---
(In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #16)
Hi Michael, thanks for review.
In my opinion will be better to wait while developer fix it, so I rolled
back package to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
--- Comment #16 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com ---
I'm pasting the result of a semi-automated, hand-edited review (using the
fedora-review tool):
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949073
Bug ID: 949073
Summary: Review Request: nagios-check_mk - A new general
purpose Nagios-plugin for retrieving data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888301
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888301
--- Comment #33 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920309
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920309
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949038
--- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
The test to obsoletes/conflicts current package is temporary.
Will have to be fixed when all the horde packages will be ready and the old
ones could be removed from
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919442
Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911042
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911042
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948661
--- Comment #2 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
- Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
- Note: %defattr present but not needed
- Note: Buildroot: present but not
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922481
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dan.mas...@gmail.com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948661
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948664
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948667
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948669
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948670
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948671
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
--- Comment #19 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com ---
fedora-review+ set. You may proceed with your SCM request.
I suggest you to make the dependency on xorg-x11-server-Xorg an arch-specific
one and add a comment explaining
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948667
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
# rpmlint
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
--- Comment #20 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Michal for picking this up! Sorry I couldn't get to this sooner.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
--- Comment #21 from Jerome Glisse jgli...@redhat.com ---
The exit one is really a panic for case that should not happen, it's more like
an assert i guess but using exit trigger Xorg trace stuff so often you end up
with something
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922481
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922488
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948661
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948664
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948667
--- Comment #2 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Issues:
===
# rpmlint nodejs-json-stringify-safe
nodejs-json-stringify-safe.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922481
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948667
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948667
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922488
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929214
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929214
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-pear-Net-IMAP-1.1.2-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948275
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-phpunit-Version-1.0.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923470
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-q-1.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927894
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
