Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911044
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911044
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-pg-0.12.3-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-pg-0.12.3-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911044
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-pg-0.12.3-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-pg-0.12.3-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959926
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960194
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960199
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||959926
--
You are receivi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960200
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||959926
--
You are receivi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959926
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||960198, 960199, 960200,
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960201
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||959926
--
You are receivi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960198
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||959926
--
You are receivi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960201
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960201
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||960200
--
You are receivi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960200
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||960201
--
You are receivi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960199
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960198
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960200
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903380
--- Comment #7 from Alex G. ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903380
--- Comment #8 from Alex G. ---
-- MUST --
> [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
> Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
> libint2-devel
> Requires: libint2 = %{versio
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917365
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
ibus-bogo-0.3-5.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-bogo-0.3-5.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917365
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
ibus-bogo-0.3-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-bogo-0.3-5.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959720
--- Comment #2 from Alex G. ---
> It's rather odd that every single source file states that the license is
> GPLv2+, but the readme states that
>
> "PulseView is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> (GPL),
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959720
--- Comment #3 from Alex G. ---
New Spec URL:
http://g-tech.no-ip.org/~mrnuke/fedrev/pulseview-0.1.0-2/pulseview.spec
New SRPM URL:
http://g-tech.no-ip.org/~mrnuke/fedrev/pulseview-0.1.0-2/pulseview-0.1.0-2.fc18.src.rpm
--
You a
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958414
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-CheckDeps-0.002-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-CheckDeps-0.002-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958414
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-CheckDeps-0.002-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-CheckDeps-0.002-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924350
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924350
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zBg5tYeNYJ&a=c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958881
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958881
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pXfToO5Mh7&a=c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923460
--- Comment #3 from Dan Williams ---
Hey, can you post the docs patch you had again? I have no idea where it went,
and I'm sure the pastebin expired. I'd like to apply it upstream since it's
been reviewed and approved.
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959734
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865979
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956120
Alec Leamas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953699
Alex G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mr.nuke...@gmail.com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921847
--- Comment #8 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> - License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found.
> Please
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953701
Alex G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mr.nuke...@gmail.com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920844
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959734
--- Comment #4 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
While the nexus-osciprime firmware falls under the binary firmware exception so
it's okay to use the prebuilt binary, in order to be complaint with the GPLv2
you still need to ship the so
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923460
--- Comment #4 from Yanko Kaneti ---
Created attachment 744285
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=744285&action=edit
Always generate docs on dist time
Perhaps this was the one. At least that's whats git diff 'ing
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920844
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Commen
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953859
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953859
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
google-noto-fonts-20130411-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916087
Boyan Bonev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boyan.bo...@me.com
--- Com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925971
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925971
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski ---
THANKS for the review!
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: drupal6-prepopulate
Short Description: Allows form elements to be pre-populated from the URL
Owners: siwi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #13 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra.spec
SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra-0.9.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
* Thu May 02 2013 T.C. Hollingsworth - 0.9.0-1
- new upstream
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924350
--- Comment #6 from Wolfgang Ulbrich ---
Patrick,
i'm still wondering about your hint with the download link
If i use
http://www.zavedil.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/mate-applet-lockkeys-0.2.0.tar.gz
,than the download works.
ht
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925971
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925971
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hWLQvFR5fQ&a=c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924350
--- Comment #7 from Wolfgang Ulbrich ---
Opps,
i got it, you meant the url.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pGvUDNhf6
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865979
--- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Status: NEEDS WORK
= Issues
[!]: A LICENSE file
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
soxr-0.1.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soxr-0.1.1-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920849
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953699
--- Comment #1 from Alex G. ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Permissions on files are set properly.
Note: See
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920849
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Commen
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959118
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959118
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920844
Tanner Doshier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920849
Tanner Doshier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960252
Bug ID: 960252
Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Touch - Update access,
modification timestamps, creating nonexistent files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960253
Bug ID: 960253
Summary: Review Request: perl-Schedule-RateLimiter - Prevent
events from happening too quickly
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pac
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953699
--- Comment #2 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/python-rencode.spec
SRPM:
http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/python-rencode-1.0.2-1.20121209svn33.fc19.src.rpm
Koji scratch build: http://koji
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953699
--- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
Oops, lets try that again with the right SRPM URL this time:
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/python-rencode.spec
SRPM:
http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/python-rencode-1.0.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960258
Bug ID: 960258
Summary: Review Request: sailcut - A sail design and plotting
software
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Se
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960194
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
C
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905255
--- Comment #116 from Fedora Update System ---
open-vm-tools-9.2.3-5.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/open-vm-tools-9.2.3-5.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953699
Alex G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960258
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960258
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|anto.tra...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920856
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921847
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953699
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921847
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920856
Tanner Doshier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960264
Bug ID: 960264
Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - Update to
commit e220f6c from NM_0_8 branch
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924350
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924350
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
mate-applet-lockkeys-0.2.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-applet-lockkeys-0.2.0-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this ma
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924350
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
mate-applet-lockkeys-0.2.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-applet-lockkeys-0.2.0-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this ma
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924350
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
mate-applet-lockkeys-0.2.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-applet-lockkeys-0.2.0-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this m
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921847
--- Comment #11 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Yes, haven't had the time to work on it yet. Should be doing it over the next
few days. Also, I should be able to review the other 2 packages you provided me
links for, if they haven't bee
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921847
--- Comment #12 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
No worries. :-)
I already swapped the other two with someone else, but thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960268
Bug ID: 960268
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic - Uses
Perl::Critic in test programs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920844
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920844
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Dgh8FkKD3E&a=c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920849
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920849
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1Nv0ZJmmoC&a=c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920856
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920856
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EIDv1OHMVp&a=c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921847
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921847
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lA5EvV1JDZ&a=
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953699
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953699
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5F6kO6L5Ly&a=c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903380
--- Comment #9 from Susi Lehtola ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> [ ]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
> beginning of %install.
> Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
> [
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960194
--- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani ---
Full review below. Main points:
- Also call desktop-file-validate on qterminal_drop.desktop
- Download URL does not work? As a possibility, how I handled the github url
for python-pillow: [1]
-
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960194
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani ---
Oh, I forgot: I've never seen %make_install. There is some reference to
%makeinstall in the guidelines but it is discouraged. How different is
%make_install to make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953701
--- Comment #1 from Alex G. ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959720
Susi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903380
--- Comment #10 from Alex G. ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> > [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
> > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
> > libint2-devel
>
> Added th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905255
--- Comment #117 from Fedora Update System ---
open-vm-tools-9.2.3-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/open-vm-tools-9.2.3-5.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910233
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
geoip-geolite-2013.04-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/geoip-geolite-2013.04-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
101 - 200 of 287 matches
Mail list logo